Computational · Paper · 2026

Active Assembly Theory and Practice

Daniel Ari Friedman

Zenodo

Download PDF Publication source Paper folder on GitHub Read extracted text

Overview

Assembly traces can support explicit probabilistic inference without being treated as recovered program meaning. Active Assembly Theory and Practice makes that distinction executable: transparent x86-64 fixtures are decoded with Capstone, traced under bounded Unicorn emulation, and mapped to typed observations that distinguish missing, unseen, and unsupported evidence. Two Generalized Notation Notation (GNN) specifications define passive-phase and prospective sensor models whose tensors drive real pymdp execution. A native categorical Julia/RxInfer companion consumes the passive model's same parameters (Friedman 2026; Heins et al. 2022; Bagaev et al. 2023). The sensor Agent selects an action before fixture evidence is acquired. Independent finite calculations check beliefs and policy scores; native smoothing uses the same parameters and first-observation convention. Every inference comparator and fitted diagnostic also consumes an upstream-parsed numeric GNN specification, with source-bound runtime instances and rendered model graphs. A corpus of 10 authored fixtures supports complete-fixture exclusion diagnostics. At the fixed informative likelihood, the memoryless decoder outperforms the temporal filter; temporal advantages appear under synthetic observation ambiguity. Designed category ambiguity remains a visible failure case. The separate Gaussian and categorical Bethe free-energy diagnostics are not compared numerically with policy expected free energy. The quotient benchmark contains 64 transformation-family identifiers and 4096 rows, with 16 families held out from model fitting. The co-primary portfolio includes an interpretable classifier, a temporal probabilistic model, a fixed one-layer tanh recurrent classifier, and surface baselines; the temporal endpoint reaches balanced accuracy 0.775 and macro-F1 0.772 on this frozen bounded benchmark. Held-out identifiers share authored template lineages with the fitting data. Family-resampling intervals and conditional randomization diagnostics therefore describe this finite inventory; the retrospective protocol correction withholds superiority claims. A complementary pinned static-only corpus supplies 5 licensed source projects and 100 source-contract rows, including 40 lexical witnesses, 40 contract-directed near misses, and 20 identity controls. The corpus establishes provenance and coverage; it does not execute arbitrary external binaries or support application-effectiveness claims. Selected normalized machine-state relations are checked by Python, native execution, and a bounded Lean fragment. Exact finite sensing certificates and source-bound reader artifacts make assumptions and failures inspectable. Independent physical replication remains unearned. The contribution is a reproducible substrate for testing assembly-to-inference mechanisms, with explicit limits on semantics, statistical generalization, and external validity.

active inferenceassembly analysisgenerative modelsGNNpymdpRxInferreproducible research

Overview source: Curated paper metadata.

Methods and contributions

Read the source for the full argument, qualifications, and evidence.

Key concepts

  • active inference
  • assembly analysis
  • generative models
  • GNN
  • pymdp
  • RxInfer
  • reproducible research

Summary sources: Learning guide · Extracted source text.

Document downloads

PDFs are hosted here; supporting sources may use pinned archives.

Citation

Citation metadata follows the unified bibliography.

Friedman, Daniel Ari. 2026. Active Assembly Theory and Practice. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23484107. URL: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23484107.
Download bibliography

Catalog details and resources

Catalog row228
Citation keyFriedman2026ActiveAssemblyTheoryPractice228

Related in Computational

Other catalogued works in the same domain.

View all Computational works, software & media →