Overview
Transcript from livestream on July 25, 2023 at the Active Inference Institute. YouTube watch link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUXfgzKHV1c Repository with updated transcripts and accessory files: https://github.com/ActiveInferenceInstitute/ActiveInferenceJournal/tree/main/GuestStream/GuestStream_049 Information on the Institute: https://www.activeinference.org/
Overview source: Curated paper metadata.
Methods and contributions
Read the source for the full argument, qualifications, and evidence.
Findings and contributions
- Peters states that the results unveiled at the 2023 public event challenged both Global Neuronal Workspace and Integrated Information Theory, contrary to how the press framed them.
- Peters argues that missing nuance in news coverage changed the meaning of what was presented.
- Peters argues that such journalism damages the field's legitimacy with peers, funders and publication venues.
- Bradford advises readers that press articles making sensational claims, such as finding the root of consciousness, are probably not true.
- Bradford recommends researchers be clear about what level of 'consciousness' they mean when presenting work or talking to journalists.
Methods
- Timestamped transcript of a July 26, 2023 Active Inference Institute livestream — Records a ~10-minute talk by Megan Peters followed by a three-way discussion with Nora Bradford and Daniel Friedman.
- Peters' case examples of media coverage of consciousness science — Peters walks through quoted headlines and passages from news coverage (e.g. Nature, Science, The Economist) and critiques each.
Summary sources: Paper metadata and evidence · Extracted source text.
PDF downloads
Archived files available directly from this site.
- GuestStream_049-1_transcript.pdf PDF · 0.07 MiB · extracted-text source
Citation
Citation metadata follows the unified bibliography.
Catalog details and resources
Related in Active Inference
Other catalogued works in the same domain.