Computational · Paper · 2026

Sortition Upstream of NTQR

Documentation folder for catalog row 180 · Canonical work page

Folderpapers/2026_SortitionUpstreamNTQR/

Overview

Extracted from the local README when available.

How should you choose the judges, jurors, or reviewers who form a panel — and does that upstream choice change how well you can evaluate them without an answer key? A panel can be selected many ways — by competence, by a representative lottery (sortition), by ideological bloc, or at random — and, separately, its noisy judgments can be evaluated blind: given the agreement/disagreement pattern...

Artifacts

Tracked documentation and PDFs served directly from this folder.

PDF Files
Extracted Content

Extracted Images (21) — GitHub +15 more

Figure from 2026_SortitionUpstreamNTQR, page 15Figure from 2026_SortitionUpstreamNTQR, page 16Figure from 2026_SortitionUpstreamNTQR, page 17Figure from 2026_SortitionUpstreamNTQR, page 18Figure from 2026_SortitionUpstreamNTQR, page 18Figure from 2026_SortitionUpstreamNTQR, page 19