Overview
This theoretical manuscript presents a Cognitive Integrity Framework for multiagent security through trust calculus, defense composition, information-theoretic limits and an adversary hierarchy. The selected Part 1 edition states formal models and assumptions; claims about computational validation and deployment belong to the separately identified Parts 2 and 3. Catalog review checks the source text and provenance, without independently certifying its theorems, security coverage or implementation.
Overview source: Curated paper metadata.
Methods and contributions
Read the source for the full argument, qualifications, and evidence.
Findings and contributions
- The manuscript describes five architectural defenses and composition rules; their stated guarantees remain conditional on its model and assumptions.
- The selected work is the theoretical Part 1; computational validation and deployment are attributed to separate companion works.
Methods
- Formal multiagent threat and defense framework — Described in the selected deposited manuscript; source-text review does not re-execute or independently validate this method.
- Operational semantics and invariant specifications — Described in the selected deposited manuscript; source-text review does not re-execute or independently validate this method.
Summary sources: Paper metadata and evidence · Extracted source text.
Document downloads
The selected PDF is hosted at Zenodo; local files remain preserved archives.
- cogsec_multiagent_1_theory_combined.pdf PDF · Zenodo version 2.0 · 1.57 MiB
- 2026_CognitiveIntegrity.pdf PDF · 0.89 MiB · preserved historical archive
Current PDF version 2.0 is hosted at Zenodo. Local PDFs remain preserved historical archives. Extracted text retains its own source provenance; a matching filename does not establish edition identity.
Citation
Citation metadata follows the unified bibliography.
Catalog details and resources
Related works
Ranked by recorded methods, topics, contributors and associated software, with contributor roles and domain-only matches labelled. Metadata overlap is not a citation or a scientific equivalence.