Methods and contributions
Read the source for the full argument, qualifications, and evidence.
Findings and contributions
- The slides identify that in the GPT framing the latent semantic state is not separated by speaker, so speakers are admixed and cannot be weighted or attended to differentially.
- Reusing a renormalization-group figure from Friston, Friedman et al. 2023, the slides sketch speaker attention as a portfolio (regime) of nested attentions at all levels.
- Listed next steps are adding visualizations/dashboards, specifying the model in GNN toward implementation, and adding an action component.
Methods
- Active Inference generative model drawn as a Bayesian graph — The slides open with a labelled graph of the A, B, C, D, E, G and policy terms of an Active Inference generative model as the reference frame.
- Mapping GPT onto a minimal prior/state/observation model — A reduced D-s-o model is used to describe what GPT does: prior as training set and parameters, latent semantic state, and word strings as observations.
- Perceptual-inference extension with a transition matrix B — Temporal dynamics are added via the perceptual inference part of Active Inference, with hidden states changing over time and no action selection.
- Renormalization-group model of nested attention (Friston et al. 2023) — A figure from Friston, Friedman et al. 2023 is reused to sketch how speakers, groups and sets of groups could be modelled as nested attention.
Summary sources: Paper metadata and evidence · Extracted source text.
PDF downloads
Archived files available directly from this site.
- Slides for Iris April 17 2023.pdf PDF · 0.27 MiB · extracted-text source
Citation
Citation metadata follows the unified bibliography.
Friedman, Daniel Ari. 2023. Slides for Iris. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7838652. URL: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7838652.
Catalog details and resources
Related in Active Inference
Other catalogued works in the same domain.