Cognitive Security · Paper · 2023

Comments on AI Accountability Policy to NTIA

NTIA

Catalog Row52
Citation KeyFriedman2023CommentsAIAccountabilityPolicy052
Paper FolderAvailable
DOI10.5281/zenodo.8025957

Overview

Extracted from the local paper documentation when available.

This paper presents recommendations on the implementation of AI technologies, emphasizing the need for nuanced regulatory frameworks rather than blanket policies. It argues that the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) is well-positioned to facilitate adaptive regulatory structures that address the complexities of AI.

AI accountabilityNTIApolicy commentcognitive securityP3IFinformation riskAI governancesynthetic intelligence

Use Notes

Concise findings and methods pulled from README/SKILL documentation.

Findings / Concepts
  • Advocates for a shift from blanket regulation of AI to more adaptive regulatory frameworks.
  • Highlights the unique interdisciplinary perspectives of collaborating organizations on AI governance.
  • Proposes the establishment of professionalization and insurance structures for AI technologies.
  • Emphasizes the importance of the NTIA's role in facilitating discussions and recommendations on AI regulation.
Methods / Techniques
  • Conducted a synthesis of perspectives from various organizations involved in AI and information risk management.
  • Analyzed the implications of blanket regulation versus adaptive regulatory frameworks.
  • Engaged in interdisciplinary discussions to inform recommendations on AI governance.
  • Utilized case studies and examples to illustrate the complexities of AI regulation.

Citation

Plain-text citation for quick reuse.

Friedman, Daniel Ari. 2023. Comments on AI Accountability Policy to NTIA. NTIA.

Primary source Documentation BibTeX