Active Inference · Paper · 2026

Prior Cognitive Art

Zenodo

Catalog Row194
Citation KeyFriedman2026PriorCognitiveArt194
Paper FolderAvailable

Overview

Extracted from the local paper documentation when available.

A prior is not explained by stacking more priors; it is located by mechanism, function, history, and fixed-point organization. The paper's precise thesis is procedural: before asking why a prior exists, identify which explanatory kind is being requested and name the rule that will terminate the explanation. This working paper argues that Tinbergen's four questions are not stacked levels in one causal chain. They are crossed axes: proximate versus ultimate, and static versus developmental. Mechanism and function ask what a prior is doing now; ontogeny and phylogeny ask how such organization came to be across different timescales. The paper treats the familiar "prior on a prior" problem in hierarchical Bayes as structurally parallel to an ontogenetic account that says one prior selects another. Both postpone the question unless they terminate. Three termination families organize the paper:

priorsTinbergen's four questionshierarchical Bayesfree energy principleMarkov blanketscognitive scienceconceptual visualization

Use Notes

Concise findings and methods pulled from README/SKILL documentation.

Findings / Concepts
  • priors
  • Tinbergen's four questions
  • hierarchical Bayes
  • free energy principle
  • Markov blankets
Methods / Techniques
  • Not yet summarized.

Citation

Plain-text citation for quick reuse.

Friedman, Daniel Ari. 2026. Prior Cognitive Art. Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21316510. URL: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21316510.

Primary source Documentation Full Text Source repository BibTeX

Related in Active Inference

Other catalogued works in the same domain.