Computational · Paper · 2026

A template/ approach to Reproducible Generative Research

Zenodo

Catalog Row123
Citation KeyFriedman2026TemplateApproachReproducibleGenerative123
Paper FolderAvailable

Overview

Extracted from the local paper documentation when available.

Abstract The reproducibility crisis in computational research is fundamentally structural: research artifacts are scattered across disconnected tools—LaTeX editors, Jupyter notebooks, ad-hoc shell scripts—with no enforced mechanism to keep code, data, and manuscript synchronized. Studies have shown that most published findings are false positives, replication rates in psychology hover around 36%, and only 24% of 1.4 million Jupyter notebooks can be successfully re-executed. Existing tools address fragments of this problem: workflow managers (Snakemake, Nextflow, CWL) orchestrate computation; literate programming systems (Quarto, Jupyter Book, R Markdown, Overleaf, OpenAI Prism) render documents; data versioning tools (DVC) track artifacts—but none enforces cross-cutting quality standards as architectural invariants. template/ applies the principle of Infrastructure as Code to the researc

reproducible researchinfrastructure-as-codesteganographycryptographic provenanceLaTeX renderingmodular infrastructurepublication integrityzero-mock testingthin orchestratortwo-layer architectureFAIR4RSresearch software engineering

Use Notes

Concise findings and methods pulled from README/SKILL documentation.

Findings / Concepts
  • reproducible research
  • infrastructure-as-code
  • steganography
  • cryptographic provenance
  • LaTeX rendering
Methods / Techniques
  • Not yet summarized.

Citation

Plain-text citation for quick reuse.

Friedman, Daniel Ari. 2026. A template/ approach to Reproducible Generative Research. Zenodo.

Primary source Documentation Source repository BibTeX