# Full text: States Change: Blakean Federalism and composition without capture

> Extracted from `Blakean_Federalism.pdf`
> Source: https://zenodo.org/api/records/23900617/files/Blakean_Federalism.pdf/content
> SHA-256: 14be777acc438a12b0b0077fe26aa0d0c57e7d8505274dfa30c3c1f05e809c52
> Version: 1.0.0
> Extraction: pypdf 6.16.2; 76 pages.

## Page 1

States Change
Blakean Federalism and composition without capture
Daniel Ari Friedman
ORCID: 0000-0001-6232-9096
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.23900617
2 November 2026
Graphical abstract 1. The illustrative network makes two overlaps visible: person p2 participates in both national formations, and
both formations draw on state reading s2. Red outlines highlight these overlaps. Solid links record affiliation A; dashed links record
interpretation I. Neither supplies competence C for institution J to impose decision D. The lower rows distinguish these domains.
Accessible reasons, support for changing affiliation and limits on total identity claims state the political requirements developed in the
article. Milton 32 separates enduring persons from changing states; Marriage 7 values time’s productions. The uncropped Jerusalem
frontispiece places a bearer, lamp and threshold beside this argument.

## Page 2

Graphical abstract 2: Blake’s scenes and institutional questions
Figure 1: Read each card from Blake’s scene through its tension to the question developed here. Los seeks to deliver individuals from
systems while his own making involves coercion. Clark’s attention to dramatic speakers and White’s reading of a priori construction
prevent the maker’s independence from settling the freedom of those inside the work ( Clark, 1995, pp. 69-70; White, 2005, pp. 116-117).
Mutual creation raises the distribution of agency within a national form ( Fallon, 2015, ms. pp. 10-12; Mellor, 1982/1983, pp. 148-153;
Kaplan, 1996, p. 82, n. 27). The lion and ox expose unequal burdens under one rule; the Angel’s compelled vision complicates an
endorsement of opposition. Los’s question asks where protection directs its force; the released family’s backward glance asks what
dependence survives release. The institutional questions concern standing, effective challenge, continuing provision and supported exit
(Heppner, 1983, pp. 55-56,59; Frosch, 1979, p. 44; Simpson, 2007, pp. 67-78; Fraser, 1992, pp. 122-124; Shachar, 2005, pp. 75-77; Moyer,
2014, paras. 3-10,14-16). Q38 and Q39 select complete lines from longer main-text quotations. The final column states this article’s
institutional construction.
2

## Page 3

Graphical abstract 3: Comparing repairs in five conflicts
Figure 2: The hypothetical comparison has 5 failing and 5 already-passing starting records. The displayed failing records name the
changes required in every passing combination; MIN is the fewest changes. Passing means satisfying the 15 stipulated safeguards. All
subsets of 12 declared field interventions are examined, giving 4,096 labelled combinations per alternative. Each of the 5 failing records
has one smallest repair bundle. Every passing selection contains it: with minimum size 𝑚(𝑑), there are 212−𝑚(𝑑) passing selections. The
bar separates 20,480 passing selections from already-passing starts, 5,120 after repair of failing starts, and 15,360 still failing. Thus
failing starts contribute 5,120/20,480; all starts contribute 25,600/40,960. The 40,960 labelled selections produce 31 distinct within-case
records, because selecting another intervention need not change another field. The independent upper-set calculation reconciles every
size bin with the saved predicate experiment. The four-box route distinguishes selecting field changes, applying them, checking every
safeguard and recording the result. These are enumerated possibilities rather than empirical probabilities. Persons, actions, resources,
affected populations and treaty triggers stay fixed.
3

## Page 4

Graphical abstract 4: Counting words in their sources
Figure 3: The table counts the printed literal word forms in 199 primary extracts containing 644,245 Unicode word tokens, grouped
into 33 recorded source families. Matching is case-insensitive and uses whole words. The second row groups individual, individuals,
identity, identities under the query ID persons. For state, states, 264 matches divided by 644,245 words and multiplied by 10,000 gives
4.10. ‘All words’ combines every retained match and word. ‘Each family’ calculates a frequency inside each positive-word family and
averages those frequencies, including families with no matches. The family fraction counts groups with at least one match. The
particulars group occurs in 3 families; 76 of 88 matches are in jerusalem. Imagination changes from 2.03 to 4.35 under equal weighting.
The retained Laocoön family supplies 8 imagination matches in 1,212 words (66.01 per 10,000). The retained The Ghost of Abel family
supplies 8 imagination matches in 1,438 words (55.63 per 10,000). Each family receives the same weight despite different text lengths.
Omitting urizen gives the lowest state/states deletion frequency, 3.454 per 10,000. Deletion removes both matches and words. Copies
remain retained; family grouping does not assume independent works. These comparisons locate passages and source dependencies for
close reading. The final inset gives the minimum and maximum remaining frequency after omitting one source family, with the pooled
frequency marked as a point. Both inset plots use one frequency scale; deletion removes matches and words.
4

## Page 5

Contents
Notation and reading conventions 6
Abstract 8
1 Common institutions, plural nations and persons who exceed their roles 8
1.1 Creating a system; releasing people from its authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
1.2 National arts distribute powers to make, select and revise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.3 Enduring persons, changing states and the value of national histories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.4 Belonging and interpretation leave authority to be justified . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2 Changing states and enduring persons across Milton and Jerusalem 11
2.1 Freedom and coercion make different kinds of multitude . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
2.2 What endures when a state can change or be annihilated? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.3 Passage through permanent states . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.4 Provision sustains passage before the costs of departure fall due . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.5 Distance changes how a person, state and nation appear . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.6 Endurance grants no mandate to rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
3 National generation, reciprocal exchange and the struggle over agency 17
3.1 National generation is embodied work, inheritance and the making of new publics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
3.2 Particularity and differentiated provision: relevant differences under common standing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.3 National mediation and the danger of incorporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
3.4 Exchange makes national particularity relational . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
3.5 The public image of a nation distributes credibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.6 A shared national voice can carry incompatible political projects . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
3.7 Gender and the supposedly universal subject . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
3.8 Reprieve, release and the conditions attached to forgiveness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
4 F rom imaginative federation to shared rule and self-rule 24
4.1 Illuminated printing and visionary conversation: making the common world changes its forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
4.2 Translation without compulsory legibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
4.3 Counterpublics and the means of contestation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
5 F ollowing a classification from named entity to enforceable consequence 27
5.1 Activating review and distributing the burdens of a remedy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
5.2 Individual access before the consequence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
5.3 Initiative, independence and revision are different powers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
5.4 Fourteen procedures expose what a named forum leaves unspecified . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
5.5 Comparing requirements without ranking persons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
5.6 Challenging a decision without reproducing its dependency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
5.7 When a protective duty becomes usable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
5.8 A selected-line collation keeps the limit of the corpus visible . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
6 Plural peoples, overlapping powers and the conditions of non-domination 42
6.1 An institutional comparator: two chambers, resources and remedies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
6.2 Revising the procedures of recognition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
7 Five Xeno-California conflicts: standing, resources and counterfactual repair 44
7.1 Care, work and the allocation of material burdens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
7.2 Release and attachment: changing the conditions of work and dependence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
7.3 Desolating taxation makes the distribution of burdens a federal question . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
7.4 A worked material conflict . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
7.5 Counterfactual repair with the material dispute held fixed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
7.6 Complementarity appears at admission, not as an extra resolved rule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
8 Agreement under translation or dependency: testing the scale-freedom inference 53
8.1 Shared evidence, reliable reports and the authority to act . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
9 Institutional revision through coherence, rupture and regeneration 56
10 Research infrastructure and the contribution of the states–nations distinction 56
10.1 Shared retrieval and accountable reading decisions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
11 Corpus statistics: work balance, copy sensitivity and term relationships 56
11.1 Source families, tokenization and the unit of comparison . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
11.2 Copy repetition and family balance change different results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
11.3 Repetition, bodily constraint and the making of eternal law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
11.4 Shared vocabulary identifies comparisons for close reading . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
11.5 Corpus-wide retrieval follows an argument back to its source units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
11.6 Word windows distinguish nearby language from document-wide co-presence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
11.7 Reading, quotation and image method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
11.8 An aggregate keeps its vitality in the particulars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66
11.9 Production, design and interpretive authority . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
11.10 When would computation add something? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67
12 Competing explanations and the next comparative tests 67
13 Reading boundaries and image rights 68
13.1 Article readings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
13.2 Portfolio version discipline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
13.3 Image rights and critical use . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
13.4 Additional primary-author scholarship . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
13.5 Further readings on invention, public art and release . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
13.6 Urizen context and refrain audit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
13.7 Collective vision, national reception and material impressions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
13.8 Labor, visionary scale and corpus-wide search . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
13.9 Revisable categories, forgiveness and the conduct of vision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
13.10 Creating systems, artistic selection and the authority to revise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
13.11 Organized poetic differences, national arts and fiscal power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
13.12 Federated inference and robust aggregation: source versions and selected sections . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
13.13 Unequal rules, release and the authority of reproduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
14 Plate sources and credits 72
5

## Page 6

Notation and reading conventions
The model distinguishes poetic interpretation, institutional claims and measured text. Relations record claims; their authority
requires a separate assessment. Subscripts are local to the definition cited in the right column.
Symbol Meaning and first use
𝑃 , 𝑆, 𝑁 Persons, poetic-state interpretations and historical national formations. Definition 1
𝐽 , 𝐷; 𝑗, 𝑑 Institutions and proposed decisions; one institution and decision. 𝐽 is a sort, not an act’s
territorial reach. Definition 1
𝐴 ⊆ 𝑃 × 𝑁 Affiliation: a person can participate in several nations. eq. 1
𝐼 ⊆ 𝑁 × 𝑆 Interpretation: nations can disclose several poetic-state readings. eq. 1
𝐶 ⊆ 𝐽 × 𝐷 Claimed competence, assessed independently of 𝐴, 𝐼. Proposition 1
𝑑 = (𝑒, 𝑟, 𝑎, 𝑤, 𝜏 , 𝑐, 𝜌, 𝜖, 𝑞) Entity, assigned role, issuer, warrants, time, consequence, affected reach, enforcement and
contestation route. Here 𝑞, 𝑤 name route and warrants; elsewhere 𝑞, 𝑤 index queries and
families. Definition 2
𝑟𝑘(𝑑); 𝐾; 𝑇 (𝑑) Boolean safeguard 𝑘; number of safeguards ( 𝐾 = 15 ); their conjunction. Inactive
conditions contribute 1 and are distinguished from active satisfied checks. Definition 7
𝑥, ℓ Tested fields and excluded descriptive labels. Proposition 5
𝐹 (𝑑); 𝜋(𝑑); 𝐹 , 𝐺; 𝑓𝑖 Failed-rule set; protected context; abstract failure sets and an intervention acting on
them. Definition 8 , Proposition 6
𝒪; 𝐵, 𝐵′; 𝑑𝐵 Twelve declared interventions; selected bundles; resulting record in fixed catalog order.
Definition 8
𝒜(𝑑); 𝑚(𝑑); Δ𝑖𝑗(𝑑) Admissible bundles, minimum size (undefined if none exists) and admission
complementarity. Here 𝑖, 𝑗 index interventions, not institutions. Definition 9 eq. 9
𝑈 , 𝑉 , 𝑢 Eligible source units, a subset and one unit. Each analysis declares role and plane
eligibility. Definition 10 , Definition 13
𝑡𝑢, 𝑐𝑢𝑞, ℎ𝑢𝑞 Word tokens, query occurrences and presence in unit 𝑢. Definition 10
𝐶𝑞(𝑉 ); 𝑅𝑞(𝑉 ) Unit coverage and occurrences per 10,000 tokens. 𝐶𝑞 is distinct from competence relation
𝐶. eq. 11
𝑈𝑤; 𝑊 , 𝑊+ Units in recorded family 𝑤; all recorded and positive-token families. A family groups
witnesses without identifying their texts. Definition 11
𝑅𝑞; 𝒟𝑞 Equal-family mean and family-indexed deletion rates; ties retain their family identities.
eq. 12
𝑋𝑞, 𝑋𝑞′; 𝑛 Query-presence sets and comparison-universe size. Definition 12
Jac(𝑞, 𝑞′); Pr (𝑞′ ∣ 𝑞) ; Lift (𝑞, 𝑞′) Jaccard overlap, directional conditional presence and lift. eq. 13
𝑄; 𝐻𝑞(𝑢); 𝑀 Nonempty casefold-distinct literal terms, per-term nonoverlapping original-text matches
and admitted units. Definition 13
𝑂; 𝐵match; 𝐿 Term-labeled occurrences, matched units and display cap. All counts precede the cap.
eq. 14
𝑏; 𝒯𝑢; 𝜈𝑢(𝑎, 𝑧) Optional word budget, original-text token intervals and tokens intersecting envelope
[𝑎, 𝑧). Definition 14
𝜂 = [𝑠 𝜂, 𝑒𝜂); Ω𝑏(𝑢); 𝐻 𝑏
𝑞 (𝑢) Hit interval, qualifying complete match tuples and participating term matches. eq. 15
A zero denominator is N/A; a populated denominator with no matches is zero. Subset counts differ from distinct result-
ing records. Solid affiliation, dashed interpretation and red competence links denote different claims, rather than successive
authorization steps.
6

## Page 7

Local notation for person-specific review
These symbols apply to the person-specific review subsections of sec. 5, beginning with sec. 5.2. Here 𝑖 identifies an affected
person, not an intervention index; 𝑃𝑖 denotes protection rather than sort 𝑃 ; 𝐺𝑖 denotes uncovered intervals rather than a
failure set; 𝑈𝑖 is hours rather than the source-unit universe 𝑈 . Boolean 𝐵 labels are distinct from intervention bundles 𝐵, 𝐵′
and matched-unit count 𝐵match. Event time is measured in integer hours from notice, with the event-order conventions stated
in Definition 3 , Definition 4 .
Symbol Meaning and type
𝑖 One explicitly listed affected individual; membership does not
determine standing
𝑡𝑜, 𝑡𝑐, 𝑡𝑟 Filing opens, filing closes, response takes effect; nonnegative
integer hours, 𝑡𝑜 ≤ 𝑡 𝑐 ≤ 𝑡 𝑟
𝑡𝑎
𝑖 , 𝑡𝑓
𝑖 Completed-prerequisite readiness and earliest filing;
𝑡𝑓
𝑖 = max(𝑡𝑜, 𝑡𝑎
𝑖 )
𝑡𝑞
𝑖 Time the specified consequence reaches individual 𝑖, in hours
ℎ𝑎
𝑖 , ℎ𝑠
𝑖 , ℎ𝑟
𝑖 A vailable, support-enabled and required preparation hours
for 𝑖
𝑃𝑖 Active interim-protection interval, or the empty set
𝐺𝑖, 𝑈𝑖 Uncovered waiting intervals and their summed duration in
hours
𝐵admit
𝑖 , 𝐵remain
𝑖 , 𝐵hours
𝑖 , 𝐵file
𝑖 , 𝐵wait
𝑖 The five individual Boolean conditions in document order
𝐵office, 𝐵revise Procedure has distinct issuing/reviewing office IDs;
procedure can revise the act
𝐵review Conjunction of the seven declared conditions for every listed
individual
ℎ, 𝑘; ℛℎ Compared procedure indices and one residual profile, with
fixed people and duties. Definition 5
𝐹 𝐽
ℎ , 𝐹ℎ𝑖 Unmet forum requirements and person-indexed access
requirements; finite categorical sets
𝑑ℎ𝑖, ℓℎ𝑖, 𝐺ℎ𝑖 Nonnegative preparation shortfall and readiness lateness in
hours; exact uncovered time set for person 𝑖 in procedure ℎ
⪯ Product of requirement-set inclusion, deficit order and
exact-gap inclusion; partial order on residual profiles,
preorder on procedures. Proposition 3
The timing atlas in sec. 5.7 retains this person-specific notation. Its two duty strata remain separate; a parameter configuration
is not an observed institution or an independent literary case.
Additional symbol Local meaning
𝜃 One declared timing configuration and its slice memberships
𝑞, 𝑟, 𝑓 Locally abbreviated consequence, response and earliest filing
for one fixed person
[𝑠, 𝑒) Strict declared interim-protection band; active support may
start later
F𝑖 Admission, remaining, preparation and deadline conjunction
for feasible filing
𝑃𝑖(𝜃) Active support from the declared mode and feasible filing;
eq. 6
7

## Page 8

Abstract
How can a federation sustain several nations without claiming the whole persons it governs? This article develops composition
without capture through Blake’s distinction between enduring persons and changing states, his accounts of national life, and the
coercion that can accompany creative system-making. Close readings of Milton, Jerusalem and the Last Judgment prose ask
who can create, interpret, contest and revise a common form. The institutional construction distinguishes affiliation, poetic
interpretation and competence: shared histories and state readings do not themselves authorize an institution to impose a
particular decision. A formal countermodel makes that gap explicit. Five hypothetical Xeno-California conflicts then test ten
alternatives against fifteen stipulated safeguards. Their 40,960 intervention selections yield 31 distinct within-case records,
exposing the difference between selecting a repair and changing a decision. Person-specific comparisons distinguish nested
requirements from incomparable tradeoffs. An atlas of 21,454 timing configurations separates feasible filing, uncovered waiting
and two consequence duties; eight pressure cases retain material support, reprisal, reviewer control and disputed jurisdiction
beyond those interval calculations. These are constructed analyses, not observations of functioning institutions or a political
program attributed to Blake. A separate corpus inquiry compares specified word forms across 199 primary extracts and 33
recorded source families, keeping copy repetition, weighting and source deletion visible. The resulting account ties shared rule
to continuing provision and effective powers of challenge. A common world remains contestable when people can dispute both
an act and its account of who they are while retaining the means to live and participate.
1 Common institutions, plural nations and persons who exceed their roles
A shared language needs teachers, meeting places and decisions about resources. None of these needs settles who may speak
for its speakers, whether one organization should receive every grant, or what happens when a member disputes its account of
the tradition. The problem begins inside collective life: the institutions that sustain it can also monopolize its interpretation.
Composition without capture names the task of making common institutions while preserving participants’ power to challenge
their terms. Blake brings this problem into view through makers whose creative work both shelters persons and subjects them
to a system.
1.1 Creating a system; releasing people from its authority
Los’s declaration in Jerusalem makes collective order a problem of making: who creates its form, whose labor sustains it, and
who can alter what it demands?
I must Create a System, or be enslav'd by another Mans
I will not Reason & Compare: my business is to Create
Q30. William Blake, Jerusalem 10:20–21, E153. ( Blake, n.d.b).
He is building Golgonooza through labor, conflict and the transformation of suffering. The declaration opposes enslavement,
yet the surrounding scene refuses an easy identification of creation with freedom. Immediately before it, Los compels his
Spectre to work; afterward he demands obedience and threatens greater torment. The Spectre invokes a sacrificial law against
the children Los seeks to protect. As Los’s divided power, the Spectre also makes this a struggle over the maker’s pride and
self-righteousness. Creation and domination occupy the same workshop [ Blake (n.d.b), 8:21–40, E151; 10:17–40, E153].
The critical disagreement concerns what Los is doing when he creates. Stephen Clark’s review of Birenbaum asks whether the
emphasis falls on system or creation, but also challenges the procedure that converts a dramatic utterance into a doctrine of
unrestricted creative freedom. Attention to speakers, narrative and historical setting can change the meaning of the declaration
itself ( Clark, 1995, pp. 69–70). White makes a more specific and less reassuring proposal: Los’s refusal to reason and compare
rejects induction in favor of a priori rational construction. On that reading, creation may produce a coherent abstraction
rather than knowledge responsive to experienced particulars ( White, 2005, pp. 116–117). These positions cannot simply be
combined into a celebration of openness. They make the next declaration decisive for this article: whatever kind of creation
Los undertakes, its political significance must be assessed alongside his work of releasing individuals from systems. The maker’s
independence does not establish the freedom of those who live within the work.
The next plate names the object of Los’s continuing labor:
Striving with Systems to deliver Individuals from those Systems;
Q31. William Blake, Jerusalem 11:5, E154. ( Blake, n.d.b).
Chains, furnaces and the felt pain of threatened persons surround that labor. The value of a system cannot be settled by its
creator’s independence. Blake makes “Individuals” the objects of deliverance, including those whose pain frustrates the maker’s
preferred design. Its consequences for those within its reach matter. Plate 12 complicates even the opposition between system
and release: mathematical fixation gives falsehood a body that can be cast off, and demonstrative science turns an adversary’s
weapon against him [ Blake (n.d.b), 11:1–7, E154; 12:10–15, E155]. Making a claim definite can expose its limits. A model,
8

## Page 9

Figure 4: Jerusalem frontispiece, copy I, plate 1. A clothed figure carries a radiant lamp through an arch. Read beside Los’s
system-making and deliverance in Q30–Q31, body, instrument and threshold make passage a situated activity. The complete impression
supplies visual context; the cover places the article’s relational labels beside the same full image. LOC, Rosenwald Collection, item
48038103, 2003 scan 1; posthumous impression, approximately 1832?.
register or constitution becomes politically dangerous when its definiteness closes the possibility of challenging what it leaves
out.
The frontispiece in fig. 4 places a bearer and a lamp at a threshold. Reading this material passage beside the two system
declarations keeps the work of opening a way visible alongside the authority to design it.
1.2 National arts distribute powers to make, select and revise
Blake’s public address in Jerusalem describes the craft of a common form before the poem’s visionary institutions unfold:
Every word and every letter is studied and put into its fit
place: the terrific numbers are reserved for the terrific
parts--the mild & gentle, for the mild & gentle parts, and the
prosaic, for inferior parts: all are necessary to each other.
Q33. William Blake, Jerusalem 3, prose, E146. ( Blake, n.d.b).
The differences concern cadence, syllable and tone. Their mutual necessity does not erase the hierarchy between terrific, gentle
and inferior parts, or tell us who may dispute their placement. Viscomi adds a material complication: in illuminated printing,
execution can generate invention. Blake makes decisions on the copper rather than simply transferring an already completed
page design; further printing can become an occasion for further invention. Viscomi also explicitly rejects the inference that
Blake originally invented the technique to overthrow conventional publishing ( Viscomi, 2012, sec. IV, paragraphs beginning
“With no page designs” and “Illuminated printing evolved”). The political extension therefore needs its own argument. An
institution whose members only execute an authorized design distributes creative power differently from one in which their
experience can change the design. Inclusion as a necessary part is insufficient if the right to originate or revise the whole remains
elsewhere.
Blake immediately gives artistic organization national stakes:
Poetry Fetter'd, Fetters the Human Race! Nations are Destroy'd,
or Flourish, in proportion as Their Poetry Painting and Music,
are Destroy'd or Flourish! The Primeval State of Man, was Wisdom,
Art, and Science.
Q34. William Blake, Jerusalem 3, prose, E146. ( Blake, n.d.b).
National arts depend on access to workshops, publication, education, exhibition and patronage. Their organization determines
which makers become visible and which account of a nation’s achievements acquires authority. Stefanis shows this process at
work in Blake’s 1809 exhibition. Blake selected his painterly work while omitting engravings, presenting a career suited to
9

## Page 10

public commissions. His independence from established exhibition venues coexisted with an effort to obtain recognition and
state support. Stefanis’s comparison with the British Institution’s Reynolds retrospective shows different agents using selection
to shape public judgment ( Stefanis, 2010, paragraphs beginning “With his 1809 exhibition,” “Hence, with his exhibition” and
“Despite their differences”). An official national image is thus an achievement of organization, not a transparent expression
of everyone it represents. The federal question concerns who can revise that image and obtain the resources to make another
contribution. Supporting a language school need not authorize its governing body to speak for every speaker on every public
question.
Matthews’s reading of Jane Shore brings national representation back to the embodied life selected as exemplary. The question
of who appears in a national image belongs beside the question of who controls its production ( Matthews, 2010, notes 18-28, 42-
49, 67). Mellor and Ostriker press the distribution of creative agency within apparently inclusive forms. Symbolic membership
has to be assessed alongside the power to originate a contribution, revise a role and refuse its assignment ( Mellor, 1982/1983,
pp. 148-153; Ostriker, 1982/1983, pp. 156-164).
1.3 Enduring persons, changing states and the value of national histories
The central distinction appears in Milton’s instruction on combination:
Distinguish therefore States from Individuals in those States.
States Change: but Individual Identities never change nor cease:
You cannot go to Eternal Death in that which can never Die.
Q03. William Blake, Milton 32:22-24, E132. ( Blake, n.d.e).
The Seven Angels distinguish combination in freedom and brotherhood from combination through war, sacrifice and impris-
onment. The issue is how a multitude is composed, rather than whether it is a multitude. Individual identities also endure;
the contrast is not an eternal collective against expendable persons. Imagination itself is not a state ( Blake, n.d.e, 32:8–38,
E131–132). An official therefore cannot acquire a person’s identity by classifying the state through which that person passes.
A federation sustains relations among imaginative possibilities and the historical national formations through which they
become articulate. A nation may disclose several possibilities; a possibility may recur across several national histories. Their
relation is many-to-many. This is a constructive distinction made through Blake, whose Last Judgment prose also describes
states appearing as multitudes of nations. It must answer to that visionary use rather than pretend to supply an exhaustive
dictionary of his terms ( Blake, n.d.c, notebook p. 76, second passage, E556–557). Damrosch’s account of universality in
particular manifestations reinforces the need to resist a detachable essence that an institution could certify as a people’s real
nature ( Damrosch, 1980, pp. 15–21, especially p. 20 n. 25).
Temporal production has affirmative value:
Eternity is in love with the productions of time.
Q13. William Blake, The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, plate 7, E36. ( Blake, n.d.d).
A language, friendship or public achievement need not last forever to matter. Its place among the Proverbs of Hell also prevents
the line from becoming a freestanding approval of everything history produces. A shared school and a punitive register are
both productions of time; they call for different judgments. The enduring availability of a state supplies no mandate to rule:
Jerusalem makes the state Satan permanent and accursed so that Albion may rise from it ( Blake, n.d.b, 31:13–16, E177–178).
Intelligibility, value and authority require separate arguments.
Fallon gives national attachment a positive role: a situated homeland can sustain imaginative cultivation and relations with
other nations. His distinction between Jerusalem’s growth and the Polypus’s coercive aggregation also answers a particular
rival reading. As Fallon reports it, Wright finds structural similarity between the bonds of love and the Polypus; Fallon argues
that the poems distinguish their forms of growth even while making them dangerously confusable ( Fallon, 2015, submitted ms.
pp. 10–12, especially p. 12 n. 40). This disagreement matters because an institution may describe assimilation as loving union.
Recognition of several nations does not settle the objection if a single center still decides which forms of national life count
as properly fulfilled. The proposal here values common histories while requiring their institutional interpreters to answer to
participants who can dissent, remain differently affiliated, or propose another account of the common work.
Mellor’s objection concerns the agency distributed within the shared form. Inclusive fraternity and androgyny can preserve a
division in which masculine creation directs feminine embodiment; Ostriker’s partly inconsistent orientations prevent a single
story of emancipation from settling the issue ( Mellor, 1982/1983, pp. 148–153; Ostriker, 1982/1983, pp. 156–164). Participation
must include powers to originate, revise and refuse a form, alongside a place within it. The nation that includes everyone
symbolically can still reserve those powers to a few.
1.4 Belonging and interpretation leave authority to be justified
Composition without capture names the political commitment developed here. Languages, memories, solidarities and shared
achievements can sustain collective life without giving an organization an exhaustive claim over its participants. Nor does non-
10

## Page 11

capture abolish binding decisions. A territorial body may tax residents for water infrastructure without claiming to embody
their deepest identity; a cultural body may sustain a language without controlling every member’s employment or conscience.
Demoicracy supplies a structural comparator: peoples can govern jointly without merging into one people. Non-domination
asks a further question about the power persons retain to make a challenge change what an authority may do ( Nicolaïdis, 2013,
author ms. pp. 7–16; Pettit, 2005, pp. 8–14). Passage also requires provision. After the pilgrim simile in Jerusalem, Los’s sons
clothe and feed the troubling Spectres and provide houses and gardens. Changing an affiliation cannot be reduced to changing
a label when housing, livelihood and access to a hearing are at stake ( Blake, n.d.b, 73:35–54, E228–229).
The reconstruction now separates three questions: what people share, how a national formation interprets that shared life,
and what a particular institution may require them to do. Answers to the first two can inform the third without deciding it.
A language association’s claim to preserve a tradition does not by itself warrant control over a participant’s employment or
conscience. The model below makes this missing step explicit by holding affiliations and interpretations fixed while varying a
claim of institutional competence. Its value is to identify the additional justification that a claim to rule still owes the people
affected.
Definition 1 (F our typed sorts and three relations). A research structure uses sorts 𝑃 (represented persons), 𝑆 (poetic-
state interpretations), 𝑁 (historically situated national formations), and 𝐽 (institutions claiming jurisdiction), together with a
set 𝐷 of proposed decisions. Disjoint sort tags distinguish representations; they do not assert that social life falls into mutually
exclusive communities. Affiliation 𝐴, interpretation 𝐼, and a claimed competence relation 𝐶 have distinct domains:
𝐴 ⊆ 𝑃 × 𝑁 , 𝐼 ⊆ 𝑁 × 𝑆, 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐽 × 𝐷. (1)
The sort 𝑆 records interpretations of poetic states; 𝐶 records claims of competence for institutional assessment.
Proposition 1 (Typing does not transfer political authority). For nonempty 𝐽 and 𝐷, fixing 𝐴 and 𝐼 in Definition 1
does not determine 𝐶.
Proof. Choose 𝑗 ∈ 𝐽 and 𝑑 ∈ 𝐷 . The structures with 𝐶0 = ∅ and 𝐶1 = {(𝑗, 𝑑)} have identical sorts, affiliations and
interpretations, and both satisfy eq. 1. Their competence claims differ. Hence affiliations and interpretations alone do not
entail a competence claim. Whether either claim is justified is a further normative and evidentiary question. The countermodel
establishes the independence of the represented relations.
The many-to-many map in fig. 5 displays this independence. Persons can sustain several affiliations; nations can draw on several
state interpretations. The institution–decision relation occupies a separate layer because its warrant has to be supplied.
2 Changing states and enduring persons across Milton and Jerusalem
2.1 Freedom and coercion make different kinds of multitude
Milton 32:10–38, E131–132, is the central textual anchor. The transcription calls it plate 32; the selected copy-D leaf is
numbered 35, also cited as 32[35], added plate e. In this passage combinations of individuals can express free brotherhood
or tyrannical aggregation. The distinction directs attention to how people are combined, not simply to whether combination
occurs. A nation or federation does not become emancipatory merely by aggregating more participants.
We are not Individuals but States: Combinations of Individuals
Q01. William Blake, Milton 32:10, E131. ( Blake, n.d.e).
But the Divine Humanity & Mercy gave us a Human Form as multitudes
Because we were combind in Freedom & holy Brotherhood Vox Populi
While those combind by Satans Tyranny first in the blood of War
And Sacrifice &, next, in Chains of imprisonment: are Shapeless Rocks
Retaining only Satans Mathematic Holiness, Length: Bredth & Highth
Q02. William Blake, Milton 32:14-18, E131-132. ( Blake, n.d.e).
The dramatic setting matters. Milton converses on the Couch of Death with the Seven Angels; Hillel, identified as Lucifer,
replies immediately before this instruction (32:8-9). The plural speaker is not straightforwardly a present-day constitutional
author. Yet the instruction’s contrast is concrete: combination under freedom and combination through war, sacrifice and
imprisonment produce different relations. Multitude is compatible with human form, whereas coerced aggregation can reduce
people to measurable extension. This is stronger evidence for criticizing a mode of combination than for opposing all common
institutions or all calculation.
The dimensions in line 18 do not themselves prove that measurement is tyrannical. The passage attacks their promotion into
an exclusive holiness while imagination is called madness and blasphemy. A public body still needs budgets, population counts
and water measurements. The reconstruction limits their claim to be sufficient descriptions of human existence. An institution
11

## Page 12

Figure 5: Belonging leaves authorization open. The same persons, national formations, poetic-state interpretations, affiliations A and
interpretations I support two different competence relations: C is empty on the left and contains the institution–decision pair on the
right. Solid affiliation and dashed interpretation links remain fixed. The separate red claim makes Proposition 1’s countermodel visible;
its warrant belongs to the institutional assessment.
12

## Page 13

Figure 6: Milton, copy D, leaf 35 (text M32). Individual identities, changing states and imagination occupy one designed sheet: the
page holds together distinctions that a political translation must preserve. The typeset quotation follows the ASU transcription; this
impression supplies the visual context. LOC, Rosenwald Collection, item 48031331; approximately 1815?.
that mistakes its register for a person repeats a pattern of reduction; the poem does not supply the correct administrative
remedy.
2.2 What endures when a state can change or be annihilated?
The Angels’ instruction does more than distinguish an occupant from a condition. Its next move places imagination outside
the category of states altogether. This limits any institution that claims to catalogue the complete imaginative possibilities of
its members.
The Imagination is not a State: it is the Human Existence itself
Affection or Love becomes a State, when divided from Imagination
The Memory is a State always, & the Reason is a State
Created to be Annihilated & a new Ratio Created
Whatever can be Created can be Annihilated Forms cannot
The Oak is cut down by the Ax, the Lamb falls by the Knife
But their Forms Eternal Exist, For-ever. Amen Halle[l]ujah
Q04. William Blake, Milton 32:32-38, E132. ( Blake, n.d.e).
The two poems put different pressures on the word state. Milton distinguishes changing states from enduring individual
identities and calls reason a state created to be annihilated; Jerusalem calls spiritual states eternal and presents passage through
permanent states. Treating every state as an immutable collective would suppress the first passage. Treating permanence as a
political mandate would ignore the accursed state from which Albion must rise. The account of states as recurrent imaginative
possibilities is a proposed way of reading these passages together, not a definition that removes their difficulty [ Blake (n.d.e),
32:22–38, E132; Blake (n.d.b), 31:13–16, E177–178; plate 52, E200]. What the institutional argument takes from them is more
specific: a person’s present classification cannot exhaust that person, and preserving the intelligibility of a condition does not
require preserving its power over whoever occupies it.
2.3 Passage through permanent states
Jerusalem 52, E200, and 73:44–45, E229, develop the distinction between persons and states through which they pass. The
political extension proposed here is a guarantee that people may revise affiliations without losing basic standing. The recon-
struction connects this poetic distinction to portable standing, voice and practical support for changing affiliations. ( Blake,
n.d.b).
13

## Page 14

Figure 7: Jerusalem 52, copy I. Two epigraphs flank To the Deists; persons and permanent states are distinguished at the threshold of
a religious address. The epigraph format supplies the locator rather than a continuous verse number. LOC, Rosenwald Collection, item
48038103; posthumous impression, approximately 1832?.
The Spiritual States of
the Soul are all Eternal
Distinguish between the
Man, & his present State
Q05. William Blake, Jerusalem 52, right epigraph, E200. ( Blake, n.d.b).
As the Pilgrim passes while the Country permanent remains
So Men pass on: but States remain permanent for ever
Q08. William Blake, Jerusalem 73:44-45, E229. ( Blake, n.d.b).
Q05 follows the right epigraph of plate 52, separately from its left epigraph and central heading; it is not numbered verse 1.
Q08 is a simile of passage. A country remaining while a pilgrim moves through it does not establish that poetic states have
territorial borders or governments. Passage can nevertheless organize a political question: what remains available to someone
who leaves a collective classification? The proposed answer concerns portable standing, voice and practical means, rather than
a metaphysical guarantee of effortless departure.
Albion hath enterd the State Satan! Be permanent O State!
And be thou for ever accursed! that Albion may arise again:
And be thou created into a State! I go forth to Create
States: to deliver Individuals evermore! Amen.
Q06. William Blake, Jerusalem 31:13-16, E177-178. ( Blake, n.d.b).
A permanent accursed state and the deliverance of individuals appear together. This makes the inference from eternity to
legitimate rule untenable. Permanence may mean that a recognizable possibility remains, so that persons can be delivered
from its hold without denying its intelligibility. This does not make Satan good or grant it a constitutional office. Recognition,
evaluation and authorization remain distinct even when their object shares one name.
14

## Page 15

Figure 8: Jerusalem 73, copy I. The pilgrim simile shares a sheet with Los at the anvil: passage depends on continuing labor and
provision. The image places the quoted distinction between travelers and states within that material task. LOC, Rosenwald Collection,
item 48038103; posthumous impression, approximately 1832?.
2.4 Provision sustains passage before the costs of departure fall due
The Sons of Los clothe them & feed, & provide houses & gardens
Q23. William Blake, Jerusalem 73:49, E229. ( Blake, n.d.b).
The pilgrim’s passage does not end with permanence. Spectres gather at Los’s porches amid the feuds of Albion’s cities, and
his sons supply their essentials. The recipients are troubling spectres, rather than an idealized company already reconciled to
its hosts. Clothing, food, houses and gardens belong beside a labor of creation and destruction that includes weapons, kings
and the hammer ( Blake, n.d.b, 73:1–54, E228–229). Passage requires practical support within conflict.
The stones are pity, and the bricks, well wrought affections:
Enameld with love & kindness, & the tiles engraven gold
Labour of merciful hands: the beams & rafters are forgiveness:
The mortar & cement of the work, tears of honesty: the nails,
And the screws & iron braces, are well wrought blandishments,
And well contrived words, firm fixing, never forgotten,
Always comforting the remembrance: the floors, humility,
Q19. William Blake, Jerusalem 12:30–36, E155. Selected excerpt. ( Blake, n.d.b).
The building description names the materials of a durable relation: pity, affection, merciful labor, forgiveness and comforting
remembrance. Jerusalem nevertheless wanders outside Los’s gate at 12:43–44. An elaborate structure of assistance can coexist
with practical exclusion. The institutional question is when and how the person can use what has been built. A hearing
after eviction leaves the lost interval of security unresolved; a translation service after a missed deadline leaves the exclusion
operative. Supported passage therefore includes interim provision, timely notice and assistance before a foreseeable loss.
2.5 Distance changes how a person, state and nation appear
A Vision of the Last Judgment unsettles a strict lexical division between eternal states and temporal nations. Blake first
distinguishes Moses and Abraham as persons from the states signified by their names. He then describes those states appearing
as one man at a distance and as multitudes of nations when approached. Nations participate here in visionary representation,
while the apparent individual changes with the observer’s distance. The political reconstruction therefore distinguishes historical
national formations from persons without treating those categories as Blake’s exhaustive taxonomy ( Blake, n.d.c, notebook p. 76,
second passage, E556–557).
15

## Page 16

Figure 9: Jerusalem 12, copy I. The materials of Golgonooza appear in the central building passage, followed by Jerusalem wandering
outside the gate. Figures and vertical forms occupy the right margin; the fourfold city follows below. The complete sheet preserves that
sequence. LOC, Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103; posthumous impression, approximately 1832?.
Mitchell asks whether Blake’s pictures communicate the exemption of individuals from damnation that an interpreter derives
from the writings. His seminar paper ends with an interpretive hypothesis, while its diagrams keep the geometrical reading
open. The disagreement supplies a discipline for this article’s visual models: their separate nodes display proposed distinctions;
their arrangement does not establish a reconciled social whole. A diagram of affiliations must remain answerable to the people
represented and to competing accounts of the relation ( Mitchell, 1975, secs. II–IV, PDF pp. 8–11).
2.6 Endurance grants no mandate to rule
The eternity of Rahab or the availability of a state named Satan supplies a decisive limit on the reconstruction. A vailability
or intelligibility does not make a state desirable. A federation that contains states might preserve the ability to recognize,
encounter and pass through a harmful condition without authorizing its domination. Giving every state a sovereign seat would
confuse a vocabulary for understanding experience with a rule for allocating coercion.
The Platonic hypothesis remains open. An essence model makes historical nations instances of stable forms; a possibility model
treats states as recurrent relational possibilities; a dramatic model retains their place in a visionary narrative; a regulative
model uses them to orient inquiry without constitutionalizing metaphysics. The present draft favors investigating possibility
and drama while requiring publicly contestable institutional reasons. The readings below compare what each account explains
about permanence and particularity.
The dispute turns on the kind of permanence at stake. The publisher summary of Larrissy’s chapter frames Blake’s Neoplatonic
inheritance as a question of extent and character ( Larrissy, 1994). Damrosch locates universality in particular manifestations
and in Jesus, resisting detachable forms; his Cusanus comparison is distinguished from a claim of demonstrated influence
(Damrosch, 1980, pp. 15–21 and p. 20 n. 25). The reconstruction accordingly treats recurrence as a relation among particular
enactments rather than a national essence available for official certification.
Lee’s introduction complicates the equation of plasticity with emancipation: pre-existent form can protect identity against
demands for indefinitely remaking life ( Lee, 2026, pp. 1–10). A continually changing collective can force people to adapt to
an authorized future, while a persistent claim about personhood may protect them against it. The political question concerns
who invokes permanence or becoming, and with what consequences.
16

## Page 17

Figure 10: Jerusalem 54, copy I. Emanation in Great Eternity and the arrangement of Reason, Pity, Wrath and Desire appear
together. The sheet complicates any simple equation of emanation with temporal birth and gives the fourfold vocabulary a specific
textual setting. LOC, Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103; posthumous impression, approximately 1832?.
3 National generation, reciprocal exchange and the struggle over agency
3.1 National generation is embodied work, inheritance and the making of new publics
Nation as the born or generations is the proposed conceptual extension, not an invented Blake quotation. Biological ancestry,
historical founding, artistic production, migration, initiation into a practice and the emergence of a new public are different
senses of generation. The theory cannot slide between them to make descent a citizenship test. A person not born locally must
retain an arguable route into political membership; a person born within a recognized nation must retain the ability to dissent
from its institutions.
Inclosing all the Children of Los time after time.
Their Giant forms condensing into Nations & Peoples & Tongues
Q24. William Blake, Jerusalem 53:7–8, E202. ( Blake, n.d.b).
Los repeatedly encloses his children before their forms condense into nations, peoples and tongues. The account moves through
organs, furnaces and a spiritual London continually built and decaying ( Blake, n.d.b, 53:1–29, E202–203). National generation
is organized work with pain and confinement as well as creative possibility. A language persists through speakers, teachers,
carers, publishers and places to meet. Recognition can support that work while concentrating every grant in one certified body.
Supporting a practice and certifying its exclusive representative are different decisions. Younger participants can challenge a
school or cultural budget without first proving that they constitute another nation; newcomers can change a tradition through
their contribution to its continuation.
In Great Eternity, every particular Form gives forth or Emanates
Its own peculiar Light, & the Form is the Divine Vision
And the Light is his Garment This is Jerusalem in every Man
A Tent & Tabernacle of Mutual Forgiveness Male & Female Clothings.
And Jerusalem is called Liberty among the Children of Albion
Q07. William Blake, Jerusalem 54:1-5, E203. ( Blake, n.d.b).
Emanation also resists a simple temporal production function. Jerusalem 54:1–5, E203, places emanation in Great Eternity. Its
gendered, relational and theological dimensions cannot simply be replaced by a nation-making operator. The formal prototype
therefore uses explicit affiliation and classification fields rather than claiming that nations computationally emanate from eternal
states.
Particularity is another constraint. Jerusalem 38, 55 and 91, alongside the critique of consuming abstraction in plate 10, require
the program to ask whether its categories obscure the lives they describe. Generalized national essences would undermine the
17

## Page 18

intended distinction between persons and states. Conversely, refusing all categories would not eliminate the actual administrative
powers through which services, sanctions and benefits are distributed. The task is to make classifications partial, warranted
and challengeable.
3.2 Particularity and differentiated provision: relevant differences under common standing
Heppner complicates an opposition between particularity and visual simplification. His reading of The Woman Taken in
Adultery finds sparse setting and restrained expression while locating significance in posture, narrative and words beyond the
image. In the dispute with Reynolds, the issue is discrimination of character rather than accumulation of incidental detail
(Heppner, 1983, pp. 55–56, 59). This changes the standard for a classification record. A longer identity file can overlook who
controls a claimant’s wages; a limited record can protect a claim whose grounds require no complete personal narrative. The
record needs the difference relevant to the decision and a way for the affected person to name what it misses.
The final maxim of The Marriage of Heaven and Hell makes the consequences of a common rule depend on the beings it
governs:
One Law for the Lion & Ox is Oppression
Q37. William Blake, The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, plate 24, E44. ( Blake, n.d.d).
Identical requirements can impose unequal burdens. A hearing during paid working hours, a fee indifferent to means or a water
charge indifferent to access makes the distribution of time and resources part of its operation. Equal standing therefore calls
for an account of relevant differences and differentiated provision. The lion and ox supply no natural ranks for a governing
body to certify: its classification and the resulting treatment both need reasons and a challenge route. The surrounding Fancy
also exposes the interpreter’s power. After the Angel’s conversion, the narrator announces a Bible of Hell that the world will
receive whether it wants it or not. A defense of difference can accompany an insistence on interpretive command ( Blake, n.d.d,
plates 22–24, E43–44). Frosch similarly objects to defending Urizen’s One Law through its declared intentions of peace and
forgiveness: the speech’s satirical structure matters to the judgment ( Frosch, 1979, p. 44).
3.3 National mediation and the danger of incorporation
Jerusalem 52 also contains polemic against Deists; its distinction between persons and states cannot simply be presented as
an already secular guarantee of religious pluralism. Jerusalem 88 juxtaposes mutual interchange with a speaker’s language of
dominion. These contexts require a critical inheritance rather than an unqualified constitutional endorsement.
I elected Albion for my glory; I gave to him the Nations,
Of the whole Earth. he was the Angel of my Presence: and all
The Sons of God were Albions Sons: and Jerusalem was my joy.
Q09. William Blake, Jerusalem 43:6-8, E191. ( Blake, n.d.b).
What do I see? The Briton Saxon Roman Norman amalgamating
In my Furnaces into One Nation the English: & taking refuge
In the Loins of Albion. The Canaanite united with the fugitive
Hebrew, whom she divided into Twelve, & sold into Egypt
Then scatterd the Egyptian & Hebrew to the four Winds!
This sinful Nation Created in our Furnaces & Looms is Albion
So Los spoke. Enitharmon answerd in great terror in Lambeths Vale
Q10. William Blake, Jerusalem 92:1-7, E252. ( Blake, n.d.b).
The countertexts are substantive. Jerusalem 43’s election and gift-of-nations language, plate 92’s amalgamation of historical
peoples, and the closing vision complicate a straightforward pluralist reading. They invite criticism of Blake as well as criticism
through Blake. National reciprocity in plate 27 must be read with these tensions; for Jerusalem 27:85–88 this article follows the
ASU transcription’s E173 locator, while Fallon’s submitted manuscript gives E174 ( Blake, n.d.b; Fallon, 2015, submitted ms.
p. 4). The program would fail exegetically if it selected only passages that already sound like contemporary liberal pluralism.
When in Eternity Man converses with Man they enter
Into each others Bosom (which are Universes of delight)
In mutual interchange. and first their Emanations meet
How then can I ever again be united as Man with Man
While thou my Emanation refusest my Fibres of dominion.
Q11. William Blake, Jerusalem 88:3-5, 12-13, E246. Two excerpts; lines 6-11 omitted. ( Blake, n.d.b).
Mutual interchange is followed, in the same speech, by a complaint about refusal of dominion. The omitted lines 6-11 describe
embracing, separation, fear and emanations at the gates of humanity. A political appropriation must ask whether its ideal of
18

## Page 19

union makes another person’s refusal appear as a defect to overcome. The difficult context cannot be resolved by drawing equal
nodes in a diagram.
National mediation and national possession are different relations. Fallon interprets the homeland as a setting for imaginative
cultivation that opens toward other nations, while distinguishing regenerative growth from the Polypus’s coercive aggregation.
His explicit disagreement with Wright concerns whether this distinction holds: loving union may transform the character of
relations or reproduce incorporation in a redemptive idiom ( Fallon, 2015, submitted ms. pp. 10–12 and p. 12 n. 40). Clark raises
a different historical challenge by situating Jerusalem in a nationalist artistic economy ( Clark, 2006, pp. 167–168). Recognition
of more national names leaves open the question of who can challenge the common account of what recognition means.
The temporal character of nations sharpens this requirement. Makdisi contrasts histories that absorb other peoples into
one sequence of progress with Blake’s heterogeneous prophetic present ( Makdisi, 1998, pp. 1–3). Nations can be historical
productions without being ranked as earlier and later versions of the same authorized future. A community’s refusal of the
federation’s self-description need not mark a failure to mature. The constitutional question is whether it can dispute that
description while retaining voice, material security and an arguable claim to powers of its own.
Matthews historicizes the vocabulary of sex and sexuality and challenges the assumption that late Blake simply rejects erotic
life ( Matthews, 2011, pp. 1–10). Historical context sharpens, rather than settles, the political question. A woman, dissenter or
unaffiliated resident must be able to contest collective authority without accepting its account of divine imagination.
Plural membership also leaves a second route to assimilation. A federation might recognize many communities while requiring
every one to accept its final metaphysical description of humanity. The non-exhaustion rule must therefore constrain the federa-
tion’s interpretive authority: people need standing to challenge the terms of recognition and the classifier’s competence without
first endorsing the poetic-state vocabulary. Historical creativity cannot warrant treating a people’s refusal as imaginative
immaturity. This places the burden of justification on the federation as well as its constituent bodies.
3.4 Exchange makes national particularity relational
The closing stanza of To the Jews names a mutual action rather than the merger of lands into one national subject:
In my Exchanges every Land
Shall walk, & mine in every Land,
Mutual shall build Jerusalem:
Both heart in heart & hand in hand.
Q14. William Blake, Jerusalem 27:85–88, E173. ( Blake, n.d.b).
The grammar joins distinct agents through exchange: each land walks in the other’s exchanges, and both build. The reciprocal
terms support a relation among national productions rather than a single owner of the universal. Yet the prose address
framing this stanza makes religious claims about Jews and the Bible. Reciprocity in the verse cannot erase the conversionary
and supersessionist pressure a reader may find in that address. A federation that adopts the exchange image has to defend
participation without demanding a common redemptive history. Fallon’s account of a situated national opening and the
competing incorporation reading therefore confront the same material page ( Fallon, 2015, submitted ms. pp. 4, 10–12; Blake,
n.d.b, plate 27, E171–174).
The exchange image changes the institutional question from how many cultures are recognized to who controls the exchange. A
language service can widen participation while a compulsory identity register narrows it. The proposed decision record therefore
distinguishes the provider, recipient, assigned role and public consequence. The parties need power to negotiate terms, refuse
an offered classification and contest the institution that certifies their common good.
Kaplan connects this address to the poem’s criticism of patriarchal possession: a family elevated over the rest of the world
can become an instrument of destruction ( Kaplan, 1996, pp. 68–69). This gives the national argument an internal rather than
merely external test. A nation can participate in exchange while retaining an exclusive right to decide which members embody
its authentic history. Conversely, a federation can condemn national self-enclosure while absorbing every people’s account of
its origins into its own story. The proposed reconstruction must refuse both privileges. A people should be able to dispute a
common narrative without thereby surrendering its voice in shared affairs; its officers should face challenges from those whom
its own narrative misrecognizes.
Heppner’s reading of the early drawing catalogued as Butlin 92 makes the woman-city an agent rather than simply a destination.
He proposes reading a supposed number as Gog’s name and understands the descending Jerusalem as driving him away. His
comparison with biblical narratives and earlier designs makes compositional transformation consequential: the image can
generate a prophetic relation rather than merely reproduce an antecedent text ( Heppner, 1986, pp. 4–5, 9–10). This reading
prevents us from treating every female personification as passive by definition. It also opens a harder question for the political
reconstruction: whose agency is represented when a nation appears as a woman? The force of a collective personification cannot
stand in for the powers of the women, workers or dissenters associated with it.
19

## Page 20

Figure 11: Jerusalem 27, To the Jews, copy I. The exchange stanza sits in the right verse column below the prose address. Its
reciprocity operates within an account of Christian origins, so the whole sheet lets mutual enrichment and religious incorporation be
read together. LOC, Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103; posthumous impression, approximately 1832?.
3.5 The public image of a nation distributes credibility
Matthews reads the 1809 exhibition as an intervention in national visual culture. Her argument connects public art, Barry and
Wollstonecraft, placing Jane Shore alongside the national heroes. She also challenges an inference from evangelical echoes to
agreement with evangelical regulation [ Matthews (2010), paras. beginning “Blake’s 1809 exhibition can be seen” and “Blake’s
decision to include”; notes 18–28, 42–49, 67]. The national question concerns whose embodiment and sexuality can appear
publicly, and under what judgment.
A school history, civic monument or association’s celebration can distribute credibility before its organizers exercise formal
jurisdiction. Some participants appear as makers of the common world; others appear as its moral problem. Non-exhaustion
therefore concerns the means of representation as well as an officer’s disclaimer that a body speaks only for a purpose. Par-
ticipants need ways to contest the exemplary figures, omissions and standards through which that purpose becomes public.
Jerusalem 3’s arts statement makes this question internal to national flourishing: cultural provision can widen production while
cultural policing reserves to officials the power to certify imaginative health ( Blake, n.d.b, plate 3, E146).
Blake also supplies a countertext to the preferred non-fusion thesis. His letter to Flaxman of 19 October 1801 hopes that France
and England become one country and their arts one, amid enthusiasm for peace and artistic work ( Blake, 1801, para. 3, E718).
Shared creation can therefore appear under a stronger image of unification than this reconstruction adopts. The distinction
to defend is between making a common artistic world and authorizing a common government: neither undertaking fixes the
rightful scale or powers of the other.
3.6 A shared national voice can carry incompatible political projects
Ferber traces the hymn commonly called Jerusalem through wartime mobilization and women’s suffrage, and follows how
performance and editorial changes alter its address. First-person vows become a collective undertaking through a chorus
(Ferber, 2000, pp. 83–86, 87–89). A national work is made again through its use: common words and melody can sustain
different political projects. The reception history makes national production concrete without assigning the later users’ purposes
to Blake.
The distinction has an institutional consequence. A representative body may commission a shared performance and invite
several communities. Attending, contributing, endorsing a statement, authorizing a representative and consenting to a decision
remain separate acts. Singing need not surrender a treaty claim; declining to sing need not reject common provision. A record
that collapses these acts can manufacture authorization from evidence of contact. Participants can care deeply about the
common work while disputing who invokes it in their name.
20

## Page 21

Unofficial choirs, workers’ publications and women’s assemblies also need access to venues, funding and circulation. Protecting
only expression already certified as representative lets recognized bodies monopolize the means by which alternatives become
audible. Composition without capture consequently protects both common cultural production and the capacity to contest
claims made about participation.
3.7 Gender and the supposedly universal subject
Mellor distinguishes imaginative reciprocity from sexual equality. Brotherhood and androgyny can leave creative labor and
authority unequally distributed; mutual dependence can coexist with subordination ( Mellor, 1982/1983, pp. 148–153). Her
reading of Jerusalem plate 99 challenges the apparent symmetry of the final transformation. The question for this reconstruction
is therefore concrete: who can initiate a claim, interpret the common vocabulary, refuse a function and redistribute authority?
Kaplan’s central distinction sharpens the manuscript’s gender objection. An attack on possessive patriarchs need not produce
equal authority between genders. A brotherhood can redistribute power among men while leaving women responsible for the
relations through which that fraternity becomes possible ( Kaplan, 1996, pp. 70–71, 77–78). The relevant rival interpretation
therefore accepts much of the emancipatory reading before challenging its conclusion. Deliverance from jealous ownership,
criticism of punitive morality and affirmation of sexual life may coexist with a hierarchy of creative subjects and emanated
participants. Listing those emancipatory commitments does not answer the objection. The reconstruction has to explain which
relations it can inherit and which it must transform.
The difficulty reaches the subject of our reconstruction. A grammar may insist that persons exceed classifications while reserving
interpretation and decision for a privileged participant and assigning mediation, care or embodiment to others. Its universal
person can therefore be partial before any classification begins. The test asks who may initiate a claim, refuse a function,
interpret the shared vocabulary and redistribute authority. Neutral names for the sorts in Definition 1 do not themselves
remove a hierarchy built into their relations.
Ostriker identifies four partly inconsistent orientations: liberation, complementarity, erotic confinement and female subordi-
nation. Oothoon’s agency does not secure deliverance, and the late poems leave the distribution of mediation and authority
contested ( Ostriker, 1982/1983, pp. 156–164). These orientations cut across any simple story of an early emancipatory Blake
followed by a uniformly patriarchal one. They direct attention to relationships within the proposed union, including the position
of the person who refuses its promised harmony.
Freedom to refuse must include the possibility of remaining. Mellor’s criticism of gendered creative priority asks who determines
the purposes of a shared world, even when everyone is said to contribute to it ( Mellor, 1982/1983, pp. 149–153). Simpson’s
account of a person who affirms citizenship while contesting exclusion from membership puts a related problem in a different
political setting ( Simpson, 2007, pp. 76–78). A person may reject an assigned role without wishing to abandon a people, place
or relationship. Supported passage therefore needs a companion: standing to challenge the terms of participation from within.
The federation must protect that challenge without requiring an exhaustive account of the claimant’s identity or assuming that
it originates the people’s authority.
Q11 places interchange and dominion in the same speech. Its juxtaposition tests the reconstruction more severely than a
promise of union taken alone: the other participant’s refusal must remain an action to answer, rather than a deficiency the
whole is entitled to overcome.
All Human Forms identified even Tree Metal Earth & Stone. all
Human Forms identified, living going forth & returning wearied
Into the Planetary lives of Years Months Days & Hours reposing
And then Awaking into his Bosom in the Life of Immortality.
And I heard the Name of their Emanations they are named Jerusalem
Q15. William Blake, Jerusalem 99:1–5, E258–259. ( Blake, n.d.b).
The ending moves through years, months, days and hours into renewed life; it neither abandons temporal rhythms nor supplies
an institutional voting rule. Plate 99 places the naming of emanations above a design of intertwined forms. Read alongside the
dominion language of Q11, this juxtaposition turns the distribution of agency into a question for the theory: who names the
shared life, and who can refuse an assigned part in it? Mellor’s account of gendered creative priority and Ostriker’s analysis
of female bodies make the attractive image of union answerable to these questions ( Mellor, 1982/1983, pp. 149–153; Ostriker,
1982/1983, pp. 162–165). A shared world needs participants who can interpret and revise its terms, including from within a
continuing relationship.
The plate 99 dispute makes that test unusually precise. Kaplan disagrees with Mellor’s interpretation of Jerusalem’s musculature,
attributing it instead to problems of drawing and the influence of Michelangelo. He nevertheless locates absorption in the
embrace and its narrative setting ( Kaplan, 1996, p. 82 n. 27). Agreement on the political objection thus does not establish
agreement on its visual evidence. A stronger response must distinguish the contested bodily feature from the relation inferred
between the figures. It cannot dismiss the larger criticism merely by offering another explanation of musculature, or certify
that criticism by treating bodily appearance as an unambiguous code.
21

## Page 22

Figure 12: Jerusalem 99, copy I. The final five lines stand above intertwined human forms. Mellor’s account of visual union and
Kaplan’s explicit objection frame a dispute over whose agency that union represents ( Mellor, 1982/1983, pp. 149–153; Kaplan, 1996,
p. 82, n. 27). This uncropped impression supplies the design discussed here, separately from the transcription. LOC, Rosenwald
Collection, item 48038103; posthumous impression, approximately 1832?.
The final five lines also complicate a complete disappearance thesis: their last act names the emanations Jerusalem ( Blake,
n.d.b, 99:1–5, E258–259). Naming can register persistence without establishing an equal capacity to initiate, refuse or judge.
Conversely, an image of union need not by itself demonstrate the elimination of every difference. The issue is what account of
agency makes these features cohere. The political construction should therefore treat reciprocal union and assimilation as rival
readings whose explanatory burdens remain visible. Its own commitment is that common life must leave participants able to
contest their assigned part. That commitment cannot depend on proving that the poem’s conclusion has already achieved it.
Herrstrom supplies a substantive rival to a reading organized wholly around escape from incorporation. He reads Jerusalem
through the reconstruction of a living human body and the reunion of furnace and wheel: transformed unity answers es-
trangement ( Herrstrom, 1981, pp. 66, 68, 75). The distinction developed here concerns independent persons within relations.
Contributions to shared food, care, language and infrastructure create obligations with a purpose and a limit; administrators
answer for their exercise of those powers. Its normative premise is that participants retain standing to dispute the purpose and
distribution of that common work, including when they reject the whole’s account of their refusal.
3.8 Reprieve, release and the conditions attached to forgiveness
Heppner leaves a difficult visual fact in view: the accusers depart, but the woman remains bound. His account connects
dependency and strength in her posture and asks the spectator to participate in the unwritten words near Jesus’s finger
(Heppner, 1983, pp. 49–54). Reprieve and release are different. Reversing an accusation does not return a job or remove a
dependency. A successful appeal needs an actor responsible for the remaining constraint and resources to remove it; relief
cannot depend on gratitude to the institution that grants it.
Saying, Doth Jehovah Forgive a Debt only on condition that it shall
Be Payed? Doth he Forgive Pollution only on conditions of Purity
That Debt is not Forgiven! That Pollution is not Forgiven
Such is the Forgiveness of the Gods, the Moral Virtues of the
Heathen, whose tender Mercies are Cruelty. But Jehovahs Salvation
Is without Money & without Price, in the Continual Forgiveness of Sins
In the Perpetual Mutual Sacrifice in Great Eternity! for behold!
Q20. William Blake, Jerusalem 61:17–23, E212. Selected excerpt. ( Blake, n.d.b).
Joseph reports the dream-voice after Mary’s challenge to his rejection and his embrace of her. The speech questions forgiveness
conditional on payment or purity while retaining perpetual mutual sacrifice. Its religious relation supplies the terms of the
difficulty. In the institutional reconstruction, a claimant regains basic standing without first accepting an association’s judgment
22

## Page 23

Figure 13: Jerusalem 61, copy I. Joseph and Mary’s exchange leads into the dream-voice about debt, purity and forgiveness, then
Mary’s song and the infant/cross sequence. Small forms accompany the right margin. This sheet stages the dialogue discussed here; it is
distinct from the watercolor analyzed by Heppner. LOC, Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103; posthumous impression, approximately
1832?.
of their character, reconciling with its officials or ending criticism. A person harmed by an office need not forgive it to obtain
protection. Accountability can still address the act, evidence, restitution and prevention of further harm.
Jerusalem makes the distinction between persons and states a condition of forgiveness, rather than simply a theory of identity:
Learn therefore O Sisters to distinguish the Eternal Human
That walks about among the stones of fire in bliss & woe
Alternate! from those States or Worlds in which the Spirit travels:
This is the only means to Forgiveness of Enemies[.]
Q27. William Blake, Jerusalem 49:72–75, E199. ( Blake, n.d.b).
Erin’s address has just described heavens feeding upon condemned souls, then refused to identify Luvah with the state named
Satan. Deliverance recurs “time after time” : it cannot depend on certifying that a person has finally acquired an immaculate
identity. The enemy remains someone whose present relation can change. This is more demanding than tolerating harmless
difference, since the distinction operates amid accusations, sacrifice and the enjoyment of another’s condemnation ( Blake, n.d.b,
49:60–75, E199).
The passage also resists an easy administrative translation. Erin calls distinguishing person and state the only means to
forgiveness; the ensuing response asks that the remembrance of sin be taken away. That religious demand cannot settle what
an institution should preserve as evidence of injury. Nor can an office require a harmed person to forgive an adversary, abandon
a complaint or endorse the office’s account of reconciliation. A public record may need to retain what happened precisely so
that the victim does not have to recount it repeatedly ( Blake, n.d.b, 50:18–30, E200).
Durable evidence differs from a permanent civic sentence. It can preserve an account of a harmful act, impose a warranted
protective restriction and assign restitution without treating the person as the exhaustive embodiment of the wrong. Revision
needs its own conditions: which evidence could change the restriction, who hears the request, and what protections continue for
those exposed to renewed harm? Passage concerns the conditions under which relations can alter; it does not require that every
injured participant resume the relation. Forgiveness supplies a challenge to punitive identification while leaving the institutional
duties of protection and accountability to be defended.
Frosch’s objection to Mitchell makes continued opposition part of the forgiveness question. Releasing people from punitive
identification does not reconcile the reader to their claims: intellectual error remains subject to judgment ( Frosch, 1979, pp. 45–
46). This gives the institutional distinction a precise form. A person retains standing while an assertion, practice or decision
can still receive an adverse finding. Reinstating a claimant’s civic status and determining restitution for an injurious act can
belong to the same proceeding. Neither requires the harmed person to endorse a story of achieved reconciliation.
23

## Page 24

4 From imaginative federation to shared rule and self-rule
Architecture A is a federation of enduring relational possibilities. Historical nations articulate, combine and transform those
possibilities through particular practices. The federal whole is enacted in translation, encounter, common work, hospitality,
disagreement and passage. It is not exclusively embodied by a dominant nation. National formations contribute particular
histories and practices without acquiring ownership of the possibilities they disclose or of the people who sustain them.
Architecture A specifies a relation among possibilities, historical formations and persons. It preserves intelligibility and en-
counter across changing affiliations. Architecture B supplies the institutional questions this relation opens: shared rule and
self-rule, public revenue, adjudication and representation. Its criterion is the distribution of justified powers and continuing
duties, including the power to challenge how the common world has been described.
Architecture B distinguishes that imaginative constitution from a legal constitution. The latter must allocate real powers
among territorial units, task-specific authorities, national-cultural bodies and shared institutions. A watershed and a language
community may need different boundaries. A migrant may be subject to a jurisdiction without belonging to a recognized
national association. A nation may cross jurisdictions without acquiring an unlimited police power over its members.
The institutional construction starts from equal personhood, bodily security, conscience, expression, due process, material
access and contestability. These are its normative premises. Differentiated arrangements can protect equal standing where
uniform administration reproduces dispossession. Each asymmetry therefore needs a stated purpose, an affected population,
an account of its burdens and a means of challenge.
Three proposed mechanisms translate the grammar into institutional questions. A translation obligation requires accessible
reasons across national narratives and an account of whom the deciding institution does not represent. A passage guarantee
protects portable basic standing and practical affiliation change without eliminating legitimate continuing debts or duties. A
non-exhaustion rule denies an organization’s claim to speak every member’s whole identity. Together, these mechanisms specify
the institutional work of composition without capture.
4.1 Illuminated printing and visionary conversation: making the common world changes its
forms
Viscomi’s reconstruction of illuminated printing places invention within execution: graphic experiments could generate projects
that did not precede the technique. The finished composite does not establish either a prior illustrated plan or an original
rejection of the marketplace ( Viscomi, 2012, secs. II–IV, especially sec. IV, paras. beginning “With no page designs” and
“Illuminated printing evolved”). This changes how the relation between poetic states and national formations should be
understood. If nations only selected from a complete repertoire already known to the theorist, temporal production would
rearrange possibilities while the theorist retained authority over their meaning. Composition must also allow collective work to
change what participants can perceive and articulate.
The ending of Jerusalem gives imaginative production a reciprocal, dramatic form:
And they conversed together in Visionary forms dramatic which bright
Redounded from their Tongues in thunderous majesty, in Visions
In new Expanses, creating exemplars of Memory and of Intellect
Creating Space, Creating Time according to the wonders Divine
Of Human Imagination, throughout all the Three Regions immense
Q29. William Blake, Jerusalem 98:28–32, E257–258. Selected excerpt; the sentence continues into line 33. ( Blake, n.d.b).
Conversation here produces exemplars, memory and intellectual relations. Its participants do more than exchange finished
objects in a common space: the space and time of encounter also change. Read with national generation, this makes inheritance
productive. A shared public can make something through which its members remember differently, rather than merely distribute
recognized traditions among predetermined seats. The reconstruction must leave room for such changes without requiring them
to count as the birth of a new nation.
Conversation follows armed, fourfold annihilation; the creatures proceed irresistibly, and participants walk as One Man according
to fitness and order. Discourse varies with organs of perception, yet the final covenant also claims an embracing unity. The
passage can support a strong reading of transformed common life as well as the worry that reconciliation leaves no place from
which to refuse ( Blake, n.d.b, 98:1–27, 33–54, E257–258).
The later lines make perception reciprocal while preserving an encompassing common form:
Which vary according as the Organs of Perception vary & they walked
To & fro in Eternity as One Man reflecting each in each & clearly seen
And seeing: according to fitness & order. And I heard Jehovah speak
Q35. William Blake, Jerusalem 98:38–40, E258. ( Blake, n.d.b).
24

## Page 25

Figure 14: Jerusalem 100, copy I. Three figures, celestial forms and implements occupy the final engraved sheet. Its portrait scan and
sideways figures retain the provider orientation. Read with Q35–Q36 on reciprocal perception and the nations at Jerusalem 98:38–56,
the design keeps embodied making beside the discussion of a common world. LOC, Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103, 2003 scan 100;
posthumous impression, approximately 1832?.
“Reflecting each in each” describes more than adjacent identities: what each participant can see depends on relations with others.
Yet “One Man” , “fitness & order” and Jehovah’s ensuing speech keep hierarchy and theological unity within the passage.
The institutional argument must therefore locate powers of response inside the common arrangement. Who can correct a
representative, change the terms of recognition or challenge the forum while retaining access to its resources? Fraser’s distinction
between opinion formation and decision power gives this question a practical edge: mutual visibility matters politically when
an intervention can change an agenda, an allocation or an enforceable act ( Fraser, 1992, pp. 134–136).
For this political construction, conversation has to permit a change in what the whole can say about itself. A worker’s account
might reorganize a cultural dispute around hours and wages; a people’s objection might turn consultation into negotiation over
jurisdiction. Neither change follows merely from including another voice in a diagram. The record should preserve the initial
question, the proposed reframing, who can authorize a changed decision and which objections remain unresolved. Common
making then has a consequence that can be examined: participants acquire power to alter the terms under which they are
understood, while retaining the means to continue the dispute.
A new public can reveal a relation missing from the initial classification. A language dispute might become a dispute about
working hours once participants describe how translation is provided. Revision then changes the object of deliberation, rather
than moving a person between established labels. The decision record should retain that change and its reasons. Recurrence
remains intelligible without making the current vocabulary complete.
Viscomi’s later Turner essay also questions whether Blake’s refusal to supply detached designs in 1818 establishes absolute
indivisibility. Reused images, available prints and practical artistic choices complicate that account ( Viscomi, 2022, secs. II–III,
paras. beginning “Questioning Blake’s verity” and “Blake really was redirecting”). Participation in a composite can coexist
with a part’s further uses. Politically, shared institutions can acquire capacities that participants do not exercise separately,
while participants retain purposes the institution does not authorize. Continuing water or infrastructure obligations can be
specified without giving the institution possession of a contributor’s future activity.
4.2 Translation without compulsory legibility
Simpson makes refusal a question of knowledge production as well as membership. Her discussion of Kahnawake connects
sovereignty, gendered recognition and local disagreement; the interview distinguishes lived citizenship from formal membership
while withholding parts of a personal predicament. Stopping the recording becomes part of ethnographic responsibility ( Simpson,
2007, pp. 67–78). Translation, on this account, must attend to who controls the questions and the record.
The Marriage’s compact statement places opposition within a continuing relation:
25

## Page 26

Figure 15: Jerusalem 98, copy I. Intertwined forms above and a procession of creatures below frame the dense text. Q29 selects
conversation creating memory, space and time (28–32); Q35 follows reciprocal perception (38–40); Q36 follows kingdoms, taxation and
the nations (51–56). The complete sheet keeps those passages beside their surrounding annihilation and national imagery. LOC,
Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103; posthumous impression, approximately 1832?.
Opposition is true Friendship.
Q40. William Blake, The Marriage of Heaven and Hell, plate 20, E42. ( Blake, n.d.d).
The maxim closes a contest over who can show whom a world. The narrator seizes the Angel and drives him through a contrary
vision; the Angel objects to imposition, and the reply acknowledges that they impose on one another. Friendship contains
antagonism and correction here, while the conduct of the journey remains coercive ( Blake, n.d.d, plates 17–20, E41–42). For
the translation obligation, the question is whether opposition can change the framing of a dispute while the parties retain
standing. An interpreter may reproduce a claimant’s words accurately while controlling which questions a hearing permits.
A rival interpreter, an alternative description of the injury and a route to revise the agenda make that framing answerable.
The later Angel-to-Devil conversion belongs to the separate Fancy of plates 22–24; it supplies a different relation between
conversation and changed allegiance.
A passage guarantee should not require exhaustive legibility. A person may contest a classification without furnishing a
replacement total identity. The translation obligation makes an institution’s coercive act and competence answerable; it does
not entitle the federation to complete cultural, familial or spiritual disclosure. Refusal of disclosure, membership, a particular
decision and the forum’s jurisdiction are different actions. None may be automatically recorded as missing data, administrative
failure or assent.
There is a hard converse: information protection cannot give officials an unlimited defense against people challenging exclusion.
An affected person may need records a governing body prefers to withhold. A defensible procedure must identify the relevant
decision, evidence, access rights, sensitive-information protections and the forum’s warrant. Neither universal disclosure nor
collective secrecy settles that conflict. The procedure must reconcile access to reasons with protection against compulsory
disclosure.
4.3 Counterpublics and the means of contestation
Fraser makes the right to remain collective as well as individual. Her counterpublics provide settings in which subordinated
people develop interpretations of their needs and identities; their withdrawal and regrouping can support intervention in wider
public debate. She also warns that counterpublics can reproduce exclusion ( Fraser, 1992, pp. 122–124). A federation should
therefore protect the formation of opposition within and across recognized nations without equating every opposition with a
new sovereign unit. A women’s forum, a workers’ publication or an unaffiliated residents’ assembly may need resources and
access to common institutions while refusing the claim to represent an entire people. Cultural plurality cannot be measured
only by the organizations already awarded seats.
26

## Page 27

Her argument about participation also exceeds the removal of formal barriers: unequal social relations can continue to structure
discussion after a forum admits everyone ( Fraser, 1992, pp. 118–121). In this reconstruction, reimbursement for a hearing
cannot be assumed to neutralize dependence on an employer or an association that controls housing. Support must reach the
conditions under which people prepare, speak and return to daily life. A study should therefore examine who can lose work,
care or accommodation through contestation, alongside who appears on a participant list.
This changes what the translation obligation must secure. A claimant needs more than permission to submit reasons in an
authorized language: people need places and time to formulate reasons together before presenting them to a body they oppose.
Funding only official national representatives can make dissent dependent on the very institutions it challenges. A possible
arrangement would support independent meeting space, interpretation, childcare and circulation of arguments, with allocation
criteria that opponents can themselves question. These are proposals for the present reconstruction. They do not follow from
labeling a group a counterpublic, and their effect would depend on whether participants actually control the relevant means.
Fraser distinguishes publics that form opinion from those that also make decisions, then raises the accountability of decision-
making bodies to people affected outside them ( Fraser, 1992, pp. 134–136). That distinction exposes a weakness in a record
that simply names a consultation forum. A resident may be fully heard while every consequential power remains elsewhere. The
record must identify what can change after an intervention: the agenda, the evidence considered, an allocation, an enforcement
condition or the rule of representation. Different bodies can carry different powers, but the connection between argument and
decision must be stated. Independence from officials and influence over officials are separate institutional achievements.
This also prevents counterpublics from becoming another compulsory national taxonomy. People may organize around an injury
that crosses languages and histories, or around an exclusion inside a recognized community. They need not prove a distinct
collective essence to secure a hearing. The federation’s obligation would concern access and power for the specified dispute, not
the certification of an additional permanent identity. A shared world remains open when its participants can create new sites
of argument without obtaining prior approval for their account of who they are.
5 Following a classification from named entity to enforceable consequence
Entomological Law follows organisms through different evidentiary, regulatory, property, protective and moral roles. Its §§2
and 11–13 motivate inspection of the institutional translations that make the same entity visible in different ways. The human
political extension borrows this discipline of description. It neither equates human persons with regulated insects nor makes
dignity depend on a classifier’s recognition. ( Friedman, 2026d).
The classification-decision record in this project is explicitly new. It separates the person or collective, any claimed poetic-state
interpretation, national affiliations, assigned legal role, temporal scope, classification warrant, asserting institution, competence
warrant and consequence. An assertion of authority is not its validation. A correct classification does not automatically
authorize the body asserting it to impose the proposed consequence.
Jerusalem 74 describes a further danger: a record may preserve its authority by closing the range of experience that can count
against it.
The Spectre is the Reasoning Power in Man; & when separated
From Imagination, and closing itself as in steel, in a Ratio
Of the Things of Memory. It thence frames Laws & Moralities
To destroy Imagination! the Divine Body, by Martyrdoms & Wars
Q26. William Blake, Jerusalem 74:10–13, E229. ( Blake, n.d.b).
The temporal sequence matters. Reason becomes destructive through separation, enclosure and the use of remembered things to
frame an exclusive rule. The target is a relation among faculties and their products. It is insufficient to identify one institution
as rational and another as imaginative, then transfer power to the latter. Indeed, the same plate asks for understanding of
Divine Law, implicates Los in driving people from their mountains, and describes the division of sixteen into twelve by cruel
laws. A classification can help bring about the population it subsequently claims merely to describe ( Blake, n.d.b, 74:14–32,
E229–230).
White reads this passage through the difference between a revisable ratio of experience and a system that prevents further
knowledge. His argument joins Blake’s defense of practical art and science to criticism of their philosophical overextension
(White, 2005, pp. 108–109, 116–117, 122–123). That interpretation supports retaining measurement while questioning its
sufficiency. His insistence on the truth of immediate experience also leaves a political difficulty: an official’s asserted certainty
cannot determine which testimony others must accept ( White, 2005, pp. 108–109, 123).
The corresponding Jerusalem passage gives measurement an adversarial use:
27

## Page 28

Fixing their Systems, permanent: by mathematic power
Giving a body to Falshood that it may be cast off for ever.
With Demonstrative Science piercing Apollyon with his own bow!
Q32. William Blake, Jerusalem 12:12–14, E155. ( Blake, n.d.b).
Fixation can make a false claim answerable by giving it a definite body. The classification record uses that possibility: it
specifies issuer, consequence, reach and enforcement so that each can be disputed. The specification does not absorb the
person into the record. It gives an objection a target and permits a correction to change the act. What matters is whether
demonstrable error can alter public power, including the power exercised through the model itself.
The decision record therefore needs more than a correction box. It must allow a claimant to show that its existing categories miss
the relevant injury. A language-service file may need to become a record of unpaid translation work; an affiliation dispute may
reveal an employment dependency. The institution must identify who can revise the question, suspend an adverse consequence
and preserve provision while the revision occurs. Otherwise, impeccable records of earlier decisions can supply the steel in
which a present grievance is enclosed.
The Figure 13 caption, printed p. 28/PDF p. 30, associated with §12.2, supplies a particularly concrete warning: issuing
jurisdiction does not establish reach or enforcement ( Friedman, 2026d, sec. 12.2, Fig. 13). The prototype consequently records
issuer and level, competence source, affected reach, enforcement actor and limits separately. Counting institutions, members
or citations does not weight legal importance or assign constitutional authority.
The record also requires a contestation forum, voice, materially supported exit, revision, public reasons and representation limits.
In resource decisions it asks who pays and who bears residual risk. Affected nonmembers must have standing. Treaty and
refusal questions must receive their own treatment. These fields expose missing warrants, excluded participants and unassigned
costs.
The software flags specified transitions: a vision ranking determining rights, poetic interpretation serving as the sole warrant
for coercion, or an affected population excluded from review. A completed record makes these claims available for inspection.
Practical inquiry must then establish whether reasons are truthful, hearings accessible and remedies effective.
Consider a recognition decision concerning a bilingual household. The entities are individual members, who retain standing;
the role might be eligible users of a language service. The asserting body could be a municipal service board. Its competence
requires a warrant to supply the service; its reach might be residents using specified facilities. An enforcement actor might
recover a defined fee with reviewable limits. None of these statements authorizes the board to assign an eternal identity, govern
the household abroad or suspend its ordinary franchise. This invented example exposes a transition the record must justify
rather than hide within a national label.
An Ostrom-informed extension asks who occupies a position, who can enter or leave it, what information is available, which
actions are permitted, how choices are aggregated, and how costs and benefits are assigned. Authority to revise the rules must
also be located. Ostrom’s action situation separates actors, positions, actions, information, outcome mappings and assigned
costs and benefits ( Ostrom, 2010, pp. 646–648, Figs. 2–3). The implemented record makes these selected safeguards explicit
and retains the decision evidence needed to investigate them.
5.1 Activating review and distributing the burdens of a remedy
Shachar’s joint-governance proposal differentiates submatters, prohibits monopoly and identifies reversal points ( Shachar, 2005,
pp. 71–73). Its treatment of arbitration also locates the burden of activating protection. Independent advice and recorded
choice can leave loyalty pressures intact; review before an award becomes enforceable shifts initiative away from the vulnerable
party (Shachar, 2005, pp. 75–77). The mechanism matters because a right whose exercise jeopardizes housing, care or belonging
may remain unused.
Los’s own search makes protective authority answerable to the people its remedy reaches:
If I should dare to lay my finger on a grain of sand
In way of vengeance; I punish the already punishd: O whom
Should I pity if I pity not the sinner who is gone astray!
Q38. William Blake, Jerusalem 45:33–35, E194. ( Blake, n.d.b).
He sees injured particulars throughout Albion’s city but cannot find those who have possessed and degraded them. His lament
distinguishes knowledge of suffering from knowledge of a justified target. The preceding lines make a stronger theological
claim about Providence and vengeance; the institutional construction takes up the practical question of where a remedy’s force
falls ( Blake, n.d.b, 45:2–38, E194). Suspending an association’s water supply to punish its officers can expose residents to the
deprivation under dispute. Removing a provider without continuity arrangements can burden the people who depend on it.
Review therefore records the act to be corrected, who bears the correction and which immediate duties continue. Protection,
restitution and prevention address different parts of the injury.
28

## Page 29

Plate 91 brings the same scrutiny to Los: the criticism of destructive aggregation leads into the Spectre’s severe remaking
and a demand for obedience ( Blake, n.d.b, 91:18–58, E251–252). Replacing moral rank with intellectual rank can preserve a
classifier’s privilege to decide whose judgment counts. Herrstrom’s guard-to-guide interpretation directs the question toward
the threshold itself: can a person bring an adverse claim against the body supplying protection ( Herrstrom, 1981, p. 65)?
An applicant needing water should not have to reconcile with the alleged source of injury or supply a total personal narrative
before receiving it. Where a supplier knows that a disputed decision will interrupt essentials, notice to an identified reviewer,
continuing provision and a response deadline can shift initiating work away from the dependent claimant. The reviewer’s
preventive duty also needs a limit and an independent challenge route. Helpful administration cannot become the condition of
survival.
Compare three arrangements while holding a person’s dependency on housing, work and care constant. Exclusive association
control may leave no effective remedy. A formal individual appeal may place every monetary and social cost on the dissenter. A
defined review condition before enforcement may redistribute that burden, but can also create delay, professional gatekeeping
or collusion. An unconditional public provision might reduce dependency more effectively than another jurisdictional forum.
More institutions cannot become the result variable for freedom.
A reviewer also needs justified competence, a standard, access to evidence, a workable timetable and means to make relief
effective. Its funding, appointments, assumptions and accountability remain open to challenge. Protective review may be
demanded by an excluded person and resisted as incorporation by a collective authority. The paper cannot pre-decide that
conflict by calling either claim neutral. A jointly constituted forum is a candidate response whose warrant still has to be argued.
Religious-arbitration proposals and treaty relationships cannot be assimilated into one class of voluntary associations.
Review access belongs to a specified person before a specified consequence. Standing, remaining affiliated, usable preparation
time, filing readiness and continuity of protection must be recorded separately. Shachar’s mandatory review before enforceabil-
ity shows how initiative can move away from a vulnerable claimant ( Shachar, 2005, p. 76 and nn. 89–90). In the accompanying
fourteen-procedure comparison, one institutional decision retains its fifteen safeguards while a member and an affected nonmem-
ber encounter different review arrangements. Removing one support-enabled preparation hour defeats the nonmember’s own
access despite sufficient aggregate hours. Making protection wait for filing leaves two hours uncovered when the consequence
precedes the filing window.
A separately named forum records issuer separation; it does not establish the independence and impartiality Pettit assumes
for appeals ( Pettit, 2005, p. 9). Suspension, advice and power to revise the act also differ. Tully makes the procedures
and admissible reasons of recognition open to challenge, extending the question from an allocation to the forum’s governing
categories ( Tully, 2006, pp. 25–27). Read beside Los’s fear of punishing the already injured and the provision at his porches,
the comparison makes the work and timing of contestation visible [ Blake (n.d.b), 45:33–35, E194; 73:49, E229]. It records
individual access while leaving collective competence and the forum’s own title separately warranted.
Definition 2 (Classification and authority projection). A compact analytical projection of a classification decision is
𝑑 = (𝑒, 𝑟, 𝑎, 𝑤, 𝜏 , 𝑐, 𝜌, 𝜖, 𝑞), (2)
where 𝑒 is the entity, 𝑟 its assigned role, 𝑎 the asserting institution, 𝑤 the stated classification and competence warrants, 𝜏
the temporal scope, 𝑐 the consequence, 𝜌 the affected reach, 𝜖 the enforcement actor and limits, and 𝑞 the contestation route.
Issuing jurisdiction is a separately identified attribute of 𝑎; it is not interchangeable with reach or enforcement. The implemented
decision schema expands this summary with distinct fields for rights, representation, costs, treaty/refusal treatment and revision.
The tuple is an analytical projection, not the complete serialized schema ( Friedman, 2026d, sec. 12.2 and Fig. 13).
Axiom 1 (Proposed independent standing premise). A person’s basic standing is not conditional on a national affiliation,
a poetic-state attribution, or an official’s ranking of vision. This independent normative premise governs the institutional
reconstruction.
Axiom 2 (Proposed contestability premise). An exercise of public power requires publicly assessable competence, affected-
person standing, accessible challenge and a revisable account of its limits. Practical exit and voice must be considered separately;
exit does not erase defensible continuing obligations. Treaty jurisdiction and the authority of a reviewing forum require their
own warrants ( Pettit, 2005; Shachar, 2001).
29

## Page 30

Remark 1 (Non-exhaustion is not non-government). An association may speak for a defined purpose without owning
every member’s voice. A jurisdiction may make a justified binding decision without representing every resident’s identity.
Non-exhaustion constrains the scope and warrant of representation; it cannot excuse unaccountable coercion by calling every
institution merely partial.
5.2 Individual access before the consequence
The provision at Los’s porches is already quoted in Q23, Jerusalem 73:49, E229. The review question returns to that same
source without adding a second quotation record.
The recipients have not become an exemplary public whose disputes are over. Provision sustains people amid the feuds of
Albion’s cities; it accompanies the passage through states rather than rewarding a completed reconciliation. A procedure that
recognizes the right to challenge a provider but lets food, housing or essential supply disappear during the challenge separates
standing from the conditions needed to exercise it. Our review comparison makes that separation visible through preparation
capacity and continuity of protection. Blake supplies the practical pressure on the question; the particular filing rules are our
construction.
Q38, already quoted above, supplies the paired question of misdirected punishment ( Jerusalem 45:33–35, E194).
Los sees injury but cannot identify an adequate target for vengeance. In its surrounding theological argument, the lament
refuses the easy passage from recognizing suffering to authorizing punishment. A water authority that cuts supply to punish
an association’s officers can burden the residents whose deprivation occasioned review. Continuing provision, changing an
allocation and sanctioning an official are different acts. A review record should identify the consequence being challenged,
the people exposed to it and the duties that continue while the challenge is heard [ Blake (n.d.b), 45:2–38, E194; 73:34–54,
E228–229].
Pettit’s distinction between collective electoral control and plural contestation gives an institutional reason to record individual
access. An affected person’s appeal need not wait for a representative body to endorse the objection ( Pettit, 2005, pp. 1–4,
9). An association’s place in a federal council therefore cannot substitute for a dissenting member’s or affected nonmember’s
standing. Nor should remaining in an affiliation make a person ineligible to challenge what its authorities do. Shachar’s
reversal points allow recourse across authorities; her account of loyalty pressures explains why informed choice alone can leave
a vulnerable member unable to use that recourse ( Shachar, 2005, pp. 72–76). The audit records whether a hearing requires
affiliation exit. Residence, livelihood and protection against retaliation demand their own institutional commitments.
5.3 Initiative, independence and revision are different powers
Shachar’s arbitration example makes the burden of initiating review explicit. Mandatory scrutiny before an award becomes
enforceable removes the requirement that a vulnerable party start the protective process ( Shachar, 2005, p. 76 and nn. 89–90).
This is a different mechanism from merely telling the person where to complain. The comparison below distinguishes automatic
protection from protection triggered by a feasible filing. Both name a provider and an interval. Their consequences differ when
the threatened deprivation begins before the filing window opens.
An office’s separate identity also records less than independence. Pettit assumes independent and impartial appeals ( Pettit,
2005, p. 9). Distinct office identifiers do not establish independent appointments, budgets or evidence access. The audit calls
this predicate issuer separation . It records a relationship that can be checked without treating a different name as evidence
of impartiality. Similarly, suspension, advice and revision do different work. A forum that can suspend an act can interrupt its
operation; a forum that can revise can change it. Shachar’s power to overrule an inequitable aspect of an agreement supplies
a concrete comparator for consequential review ( Shachar, 2005, p. 77). A claimant need not win for review to matter, but an
advisory recommendation and a binding revision do not confer the same power.
The disagreement about procedures goes deeper. Pettit’s account presupposes admissible reasons through which decisions
can be challenged; Tully opens the procedures and criteria of reasonable argument themselves to contestation ( Pettit, 2005,
pp. 8–9; Tully, 2006, pp. 25–27). A forum might hear objections to a water allocation while refusing objections to the categories
defining whose interests count. Revising that allocation, revising the classification rule and contesting the forum’s competence
are distinct questions. Tully’s separation of dialogue from decision keeps other institutional routes available when negotiation
leaves minorities exposed ( Tully, 2006, p. 29). Individual admission in the present audit supplies no mandate to determine a
people’s collective or treaty claim.
5.4 Fourteen procedures expose what a named forum leaves unspecified
Review-time symbols are local to this subsection and the dedicated notation table. In particular, 𝑃𝑖 is an interim-protection
interval rather than the person sort 𝑃 ; 𝐺𝑖, 𝑈𝑖 are gaps and hours rather than failure sets or eligible source units; and the
Boolean 𝐵 labels differ from intervention bundles and 𝐵match.
Filing at the closing instant is permitted. A response effective at the consequence instant acts first. Protection covers a half-
open interval [𝑎, 𝑏): an end at the response instant covers the preceding wait. Readiness records completed prerequisites, not
30

## Page 31

the start of preparation. A vailable and support-enabled hours are declared usable, nonoverlapping preparation time within the
filing window; their sum cannot exceed its duration.
Definition 3 (Uncovered waiting time). For individual 𝑖, let the waiting interval be [𝑡𝑞
𝑖 , 𝑡𝑟) when 𝑡𝑞
𝑖 < 𝑡 𝑟, and empty
otherwise. Remove the active protection interval 𝑃𝑖 to obtain 𝐺𝑖. Its total duration is 𝑈𝑖:
𝐺𝑖 = {[𝑡𝑞
𝑖 , 𝑡𝑟) ∖ 𝑃𝑖, 𝑡 𝑞
𝑖 < 𝑡 𝑟,
∅, 𝑡𝑞
𝑖 ≥ 𝑡 𝑟, 𝑈𝑖 = ∑
[𝑎,𝑏)∈components(𝐺𝑖)
(𝑏 − 𝑎). (3)
Automatic protection starts at its declared start. Filing-triggered protection can start only after admission, remaining affiliated,
enough preparation hours and filing readiness all hold; its start is the later of the declared start and 𝑡𝑓
𝑖 . An expired interval
does not activate. The timing condition is 𝐵wait
𝑖 ≡ (𝑈 𝑖 = 0).
Definition 4 (Seven declared review conditions). Individual admission and remaining affiliated are declared separately.
The hours condition is ℎ𝑎
𝑖 + ℎ𝑠
𝑖 ≥ ℎ 𝑟
𝑖 ; filing readiness is 𝑡𝑓
𝑖 ≤ 𝑡 𝑐. Together with the timing condition and the two procedure-level
predicates, the profile is
𝐵review = 𝐵 office ∧ 𝐵revise ∧ ⋀
𝑖
(𝐵admit
𝑖 ∧ 𝐵remain
𝑖 ∧ 𝐵hours
𝑖 ∧ 𝐵file
𝑖 ∧ 𝐵wait
𝑖 ) . (4)
The conjunction preserves each person’s conditions. It does not add their preparation hours together or substitute association
representation for individual admission.
All fourteen procedures retain the same E-bounded institutional decision and its existing safeguard assessment. Each lists one
member and one affected nonmember. The ordinary filing window is 2–8 h; the member has 6 usable preparation hours and
needs 4, while the nonmember has 1 available plus 3 support-enabled hours and needs 4. The consequences begin at 18 h and
12 h respectively. H01 responds at 10 h. H02 removes one support-enabled hour from the nonmember: the two people still
have 9 h against 8 h total requirements, but the nonmember’s own requirement is unmet. H03 makes that person ready at 9
h, after closing.
Proposition 2 (Completed safeguard fields do not determine review access). The original institutional decision and
its safeguard result do not determine the review-access profile in Definition 4 . H01 and H04 preserve that decision exactly but
differ in response timing; the former satisfies the timing condition and the latter fails it for both individuals. This pair is a
constructive counterexample to deriving access from the original record alone.
For H04–H07 the response occurs at 20 h. Without protection the nonmember waits 8 uncovered hours and the member 2.
Automatic protection over [12, 20) removes both gaps. Starting the nonmember’s protection at 13 h or ending it at 19 h leaves a
one-hour gap at a different end of the interval. H13 and H14 move filing to 14–18 h and reduce the member’s declared capacity
to fit that shorter window. Automatic protection can begin at 12 h in H13; filing-triggered protection starts at 14 h in H14.
The nonmember consequently has two uncovered hours in H14, even though the filing and protection records are complete.
H12 satisfies all seven conditions while retaining retaliation and disputed forum competence as named unassessed issues. In-
vestigation must establish that people can use the declared time and assistance, that protection continues, that revision binds
the responsible actor and that people can contest the forum’s own authority. The audit identifies these questions alongside the
conditions it calculates.
5.5 Comparing requirements without ranking persons
The conjunction answers whether a procedure meets its declared target. It does not yet distinguish two failures or explain
what remains to be repaired. H06 and H07 both leave the nonmember exposed for one hour, but at different times: [12, 13)
and [19, 20). Coverage of the first interval cannot substitute for coverage of the second. H08 and H09 present another tradeoff:
admission and remaining affiliated are distinct requirements, even when each procedure fails only one condition. Counting
failed conditions or summing uncovered hours would conceal these differences. We therefore compare residual requirements by
inclusion, with every requirement still attached to its person.
Definition 5 (Person-indexed residual requirements). Compare procedures only with the same baseline decision, listed
claimant identities and memberships, required preparation hours and consequence times, measured on one stipulated notice
clock. For procedure ℎ, let 𝐹 𝐽
ℎ be the set of unmet issuer-separation and revision requirements. For each person 𝑖, let 𝐹ℎ𝑖 be the
set of unmet admission, remaining-affiliated, preparation and deadline requirements from Definition 4 . Define the nonnegative
preparation shortfall 𝑑ℎ𝑖 = max(0, ℎ𝑟
𝑖 − ℎ𝑎
𝑖 − ℎ𝑠
𝑖 ) and readiness lateness ℓℎ𝑖 = max(0, 𝑡𝑓
𝑖 − 𝑡𝑐). Let 𝐺ℎ𝑖 be the exact uncovered
set from Definition 3 , retaining its interval components. The residual profile is ℛℎ = (𝐹 𝐽
ℎ , (𝐹ℎ𝑖, 𝑑ℎ𝑖, ℓℎ𝑖, 𝐺ℎ𝑖)𝑖). Its requirement
order is
ℛℎ ⪯ ℛ 𝑘 ⟺ 𝐹 𝐽
ℎ ⊆ 𝐹 𝐽
𝑘 ∧ ⋀
𝑖
(𝐹ℎ𝑖 ⊆ 𝐹 𝑘𝑖 ∧ 𝑑 ℎ𝑖 ≤ 𝑑 𝑘𝑖 ∧ ℓ ℎ𝑖 ≤ ℓ 𝑘𝑖 ∧ 𝐺 ℎ𝑖 ⊆ 𝐺 𝑘𝑖) . (5)
31

## Page 32

Figure 16: Who can actually obtain review? The fourteen procedures keep the original E-bounded decision and its fifteen safeguard
fields unchanged. Open circles mark a condition holding; red crosses identify a failed condition, with the first five columns requiring
both listed individuals. H02 isolates person-specific capacity; H03 isolates readiness; H04, H06, H07 and H14 isolate uncovered waiting
intervals. H08 and H09 distinguish admission from remaining affiliated. H10 has revision power but no issuer separation; H11 has
separation and suspension power but cannot revise. H12 satisfies the seven declared conditions while retaining retaliation and disputed
forum competence outside the audit. The marks are calculated from the stored procedure inputs, not assigned as institutional ratings.
32

## Page 33

Figure 17: Protection must cover the wait, not merely be available in principle. Seven selected traces follow the affected nonmember
on one zero-based event-hour scale. The thin bracket is the filing window; the red vertical mark is the 12 h consequence; the open circle
is the response; the elevated black band is active protection; and the red horizontal band is uncovered waiting time calculated by
Definition 3 . A response at 10 h precedes the consequence in H01. H04 leaves all eight hours uncovered, H05 covers the full interval, and
H06/H07 leave an initial/final one-hour gap. H13 and H14 share the late filing window but differ in activation: automatic protection
covers 12–14 h, whereas protection awaiting a feasible filing does not. Protection ending exactly at the response covers the wait under
the declared half-open interval convention.
33

## Page 34

The sets of categorical requirements, numerical deficits and intervals have different types. The formula compares each within
its own domain; it adds none of them together. Raw filing windows, protection triggers, response times and suspension powers
remain in the source record. The order compares what those arrangements leave unmet under the declared target, rather than
prescribing an order on every raw institutional feature.
Proposition 3 (A partial order on profiles, with a bounded repair frontier). Under the fixed comparison duties
in Definition 5 , ⪯ is a partial order on residual profiles. It induces a preorder on procedures; antisymmetry holds only after
procedures with equal profiles are identified. In a finite supplied family, the repair frontier comprises the profiles with no strictly
smaller supplied profile. If the family includes an empty profile, every frontier procedure has that empty profile.
Proof. Set inclusion and the nonnegative-integer order are reflexive, transitive and antisymmetric. Their finite person-indexed
product has the same properties. Equality of all coordinates identifies profiles, while distinct source procedures may yield those
coordinates. An empty categorical set, zero deficit and empty uncovered set are least in their respective domains, so an empty
profile is below every supplied profile and strictly below each nonempty one. This is a statement about the specified target and
family, not about the legitimacy or practical effectiveness of the procedures.
The complete requirement display in fig. 18 preserves nonminimal profiles as well as the frontier. H02 requires the nonmember’s
missing preparation hour; H03 requires removal of that person’s deadline failure. H04 requires coverage or elimination of
the member’s [18, 20) exposure and the nonmember’s [12, 20) exposure. H10 requires issuer separation; H11 requires revision
power. These are minimal requirement sets in the sense that each currently unmet target must cease to fail. They are
not minimum intervention bundles. Earlier response, changed readiness and continuing provision can discharge requirements
through different institutional changes. Where protection depends on filing, removing one access barrier can also activate
protection; any proposed intervention therefore requires a fresh assessment.
The pairwise comparison in fig. 19 exposes the difference between improvement and substitution. H06 and H07 are incomparable
because neither exact uncovered interval contains the other. Each requires a subset of H04’s requirements: H04 also exposes the
member and leaves a larger interval for the nonmember. H01, H05, H12 and H13 have equal empty residual profiles, although
early response, automatic protection and a later filing window are different arrangements. In particular, H12’s equality does
not remove its explicit retaliation and competence questions. The frontier is consequently useful as a description of the declared
target’s limits, rather than a shortlist of institutions fit for adoption.
This adds a discrimination to the paired readings of Jerusalem 45 and 73. Los’s difficulty in locating the perpetrators warns
against transferring a remedy’s burden to people already injured; the provision at his porches sustains people whose conflicts
persist [Blake (n.d.b), 45:2–38, E194; 73:34–54, E228–229]. The comparison specifies whose exposure remains and when, without
claiming that Blake supplies the filing clock. It also keeps distinct the political comparators’ demands. Pettit’s appellate route
presupposes independence and impartiality beyond our separate-office predicate ( Pettit, 2005, pp. 8–9). Shachar’s mandatory
review relocates the initiative for protection, and her reversal point requires a power to overrule an inequitable aspect of an
agreement (Shachar, 2005, pp. 72, 76–77). Tully allows the negotiating procedures and criteria themselves to be challenged; an
empty profile under fixed criteria cannot establish that further freedom ( Tully, 2006, pp. 25–27, 29). Requirement inclusion thus
makes the present commitments inspectable while leaving open the dispute about what a defensible procedure must require.
The implementation reuses the existing safeguard assessment and person-specific review audit. A comparison boundary rejects
different claimant rosters or duties before emitting an order. The current orchestrator exports the full audit, per-person
requirements and every unordered pair to a new source-bound epoch; its two figures and captions are generated from that same
result. Independent small examples enumerate integer-hour exposure sets to check inclusion, alongside real rejecting controls
for invalid events, mismatched duties, occupied outputs and changed input bytes. The mathematical order has been calculated
for constructed procedures. No observed institutional effect, optimized repair cost or new empirical case follows from this
calculation.
5.6 Challenging a decision without reproducing its dependency
What must remain secure while a person tries to use the hearing? H12 deliberately left this question open. A completed filing
record can coexist with threatened wages, lost housing, withdrawal of assistance or a reviewing office controlled by the actor
under challenge. These are not additional names for an uncovered waiting interval. Some change the inputs to that interval
calculation; others concern powers or relations that the seven-condition profile does not represent. Keeping the distinction
visible allows the audit to identify its own limit without treating every unknown as a demonstrated failure.
The new pressure experiment retains the original fourteen procedures and their comparison intact. Its eight additional cases
take H12 as a reference and continue to use the unchanged E-bounded decision. P01 retains the reference’s access and timing
inputs. P02 withdraws the affected nonmember’s three support-enabled preparation hours. That person then has one usable
hour against four required, even though the other person’s capacity is untouched. P03 makes filing conditional on leaving
an affiliation. It fails the remaining-affiliated condition while preserving admission. The two changes identify different duties:
funding a challenge does not secure continued membership, and membership alone does not supply time, translation, childcare
or access to the relevant record.
34

## Page 35

Figure 18: Residual requirements for 14 stipulated procedures and 28 claimant records. Each row retains admission, remaining
affiliated, preparation shortfall, deadline lateness and exact half-open uncovered intervals for the named person; issuer separation and
revision belong to the forum. Empty profiles are minimal in this family: H01, H05, H12, H13. H12’s retaliation and disputed forum
competence remain outside the order. These are conditions to discharge, not independently costed policy actions.
35

## Page 36

Figure 19: All 91 unordered procedure pairs under the person-indexed requirement order: 41 incomparable, 6 equivalent, and 44
strictly comparable. Read row relative to column: < requires a proper subset, > requires a proper superset, = means the same residual
profile, and x means neither contains the other. H06 and H07 have equal uncovered durations at different times and are incomparable.
Equivalence concerns modeled residual requirements, not identical procedures or equivalent political legitimacy.
36

## Page 37

Figure 20: 8 stipulated pressure cases retain the same E-bounded decision record and fifteen safeguard fields; 4 satisfy all seven
declared review conditions. The first seven columns are computed by the unchanged person-specific audit. The final four columns retain
separately declared practical premises: an open circle means stipulated protection, a red cross stipulated obstruction, and a question
mark unassessed. Uncovered waiting time for resident-b: P01: 0 h; P02: 0 h; P03: 0 h; P04: 7 h; P05: 0 h; P06: 0 h; P07: 3 h; P08: 0 h.
These are constructed contrasts, not measured institutional effects, independence findings or legitimacy scores.
P04 advances the nonmember’s adverse consequence from 12 h to 3 h, while the response remains at 10 h. This earlier event
is an additional stipulated threat to provision; retaining the allocation record does not assert that no other coercive act occurs.
The result is seven uncovered hours, [3, 10). P07 adds protection activated by filing, but the person is ready to file only at 6 h.
The protection therefore covers [6, 10) and leaves [3, 6) exposed. P08 instead stipulates an automatic undertaking over [3, 10);
it closes that modeled gap without waiting for the threatened person to activate the safeguard. The undertaking has to identify
a provider and remain effective during the relevant interval. Calling a process automatic supplies no evidence that its provider
is funded or that the person is safe from a different reprisal.
These contrasts change a consequence time deliberately. They must therefore not be inserted into the earlier partial order
as though the duties fixed in Definition 5 were unchanged. The pressure experiment is a collection of counterexamples and
material variants, not a new ranking of the fourteen procedures. Its temporal outputs use the existing access evaluator; its
practical-boundary declarations remain separate from that computation.
P05 isolates a different omission. Its reviewing office retains a distinct identifier, yet the issuer is stipulated to control appoint-
ments and budget. The issuer-separation predicate remains true. This is precisely why the figure cannot label that predicate
independence. Pettit’s appeal to independent and impartial review places a demand on institutional relations that the identifier
comparison alone cannot discharge ( Pettit, 2005, pp. 8–9). Evidence about who appoints, pays, removes, supplies information
to and can bind a reviewer would be needed. In a concrete investigation, those relations must be established; the illustrative
declaration in P05 does not establish them for an actual institution.
P06 keeps the same individual’s access, capacity and timing while stipulating that filing waives a reserved collective jurisdictional
claim. The individual and collective subjects are named separately. No mandate permitting either listed person to dispose of
the collective party’s claim has been supplied. A person’s route to essential provision cannot be assumed to authorize such a
waiver. Equally, preservation of a collective claim cannot justify making that person wait without provision. Tully’s challenge
37

## Page 38

to the procedures and criteria of recognition bears on this distinction: an institution may permit an objection to an allocation
while preventing an objection to its own asserted authority ( Tully, 2006, pp. 25–27, 29–31).
The practical columns are themselves contestable. Tully’s critical question is also who sets the agenda, which norms are
insulated from challenge and whether inclusion is governed at a distance ( Tully, 2006, pp. 30–31). An authority could complete
our four columns while refusing to record another kind of dependency. The fixed family therefore defines a probe with named
limits. In a concrete use, challengers would need a route to dispute the issue list, introduce a further source or threat and
require a revised assessment. Adding more boxes cannot substitute for that power.
P01, P05 and P06 consequently yield the same seven-condition result while specifying different practical situations. Their
equality is a property of the declared projection, not a finding that the differences are politically immaterial. The experiment
reports the practical premises as protected, obstructed or unassessed by stipulation . It neither adds these declarations into
a score nor treats an unassessed premise as a zero. A protection covering water supply does not establish wage security; a
separate office does not establish impartiality; individual access does not establish collective consent.
For the hypothetical watershed, this gives a concrete drafting requirement. An interim undertaking should state the continuing
service, responsible provider, source of funds, activation rule, expiry and route for correcting interruption. It should also state
what participation authorizes and what claims remain reserved. Shachar’s mandatory scrutiny changes who must initiate
protection; it does not erase the need to specify the reviewing body’s standard and remedial power ( Shachar, 2005, pp. 75–77).
The proposed automatic guarantee relocates the protective duty and creates a further site of power. Shachar’s review standard
would ideally be agreed before the division of authority, with an identified body responsible for oversight ( Shachar, 2005, p. 76
n. 90). Agreement between authorities does not by itself establish that a vulnerable member authorized every term. The point
is to make a challenge capable of altering a decision without making survival depend on first surrendering the claim through
which it is challenged.
5.7 When a protective duty becomes usable
The pressure cases make initiative and time visible, but a few contrasts cannot show where a protection ceases to cover the
wait. A finite timing atlas now varies response, completed-prerequisite readiness, activation and the endpoints of an interim
undertaking. Its reference is H12’s unchanged E-bounded decision, with the same member and affected nonmember, preparation
requirements, admission, ability to remain and revision power. The member’s consequence is still at 18 h. The nonmember’s
consequence is 12 h in the original-duty stratum and 3 h in the early-threat stratum inherited from P04/P07/P08. Changing
that threat changes a comparison duty; the strata are never combined into one requirement frontier.
Two slices make different assumptions inspectable. The readiness slice varies response from 8 through 24 h and the resident’s
completed readiness from 0 through 10 h, with no protection, automatic protection or filing-triggered protection. A protected
band starts at the resident’s consequence and ends at 20 h for both named people. The endpoint slice holds resident readiness
at 6 h and varies every strict band [𝑠, 𝑒) with integer endpoints 0 ≤ 𝑠 < 𝑒 ≤ 24 , under automatic and filing activation, plus
the unprotected case. Their union contains 21,454 configurations and 42,908 person records. The 1,122 readiness memberships
and 20,434 endpoint memberships share 102 configurations, each retained once in the union. These are two declared slices, not
the full joint grid of all response, readiness and endpoint values. Repeated results do not turn distinct parameter settings into
independent institutional observations.
The provider is named supply-guarantor; the clock begins at notice. Those declarations make the calculation reproducible
without establishing a funded office or adequate notice. Material support, reprisal, reviewer control and the treaty-people’s
collective reservation remain separately unassessed in every configuration. The atlas changes none of the original fifteen
safeguard fields or the recorded distinction between individual and collective parties.
Definition 6 (F easible filing and active protection). Use the local review notation of Definition 3 , Definition 4 . Let 𝜃
identify one timing configuration, and write 𝑞 = 𝑡 𝑞
𝑖 , 𝑟 = 𝑡 𝑟 and 𝑓 = max(𝑡𝑜, 𝑡𝑎
𝑖 ) for one person’s consequence, response and
earliest filing. Let F𝑖 be the conjunction of admission, ability to remain, sufficient person-specific preparation hours and 𝑓 ≤ 𝑡 𝑐.
A declared band [𝑠, 𝑒) has active support
𝑃𝑖(𝜃) =
⎧{
⎨{⎩
[𝑠, 𝑒), automatic,
[max(𝑠, 𝑓), 𝑒), on filing, F𝑖 and max (𝑠, 𝑓) < 𝑒,
∅, otherwise.
(6)
Readiness is the completion of prerequisites. It does not add preparation capacity, and a readiness value before opening does
not permit filing before the window opens. An expired band does not activate by extending its endpoint.
Proposition 4 (The conditional boundary of an empty wait). Fix one person, consequence, filing conditions and strict
declared band. If 𝑞 ≥ 𝑟 , the uncovered wait is empty. If 𝑞 < 𝑟 , automatic protection leaves no uncovered wait exactly when
𝑠 ≤ 𝑞 and 𝑟 ≤ 𝑒 . Filing-triggered protection leaves no uncovered wait exactly when F𝑖 holds, max (𝑠, 𝑓) ≤ 𝑞 and 𝑟 ≤ 𝑒 .
Proof. In the nonempty-wait case, the uncovered set is empty exactly when [𝑞, 𝑟) is contained in the active band. Inclusion of
two nonempty half-open intervals gives the two endpoint inequalities. The filing case additionally requires activation. If the
38

## Page 39

response is effective at the consequence instant, the declared event order makes the wait empty before protection is considered.
This proves a boundary of the represented wait, not the full seven-condition conjunction or an institutional warrant.
Holding the duty and active band fixed, an earlier admissible response narrows the uncovered set by inclusion. Expanding
active protection also narrows it. The qualification matters: moving a deadline, removing support or making a filing feasible
can change activation itself. Neither a response-time total nor the nominal duration of a declared band can replace a fresh
person-specific assessment. A zero-gap cell can still fail the deadline or another condition.
In fig. 21, readiness at 9 or 10 h fails the closing deadline of 8 h even where an automatic undertaking closes the waiting gap.
The protected region ends when response moves beyond the fixed 20 h expiry. For the early-threat duty, the resident can be
exposed before being ready to file, while the member’s later consequence leaves a different interval. The separate member strip
and person records prevent one person’s usable position from standing in for the other’s.
Table 1: Exact counts in the union of the two declared timing slices. The resident’s zero-gap count is distinct from the
conjunction for both named people. Unequal mode denominators result from the chosen parameter family; these cells are not
probabilities, an institutional population or a ranking across different duties. All four practical relations remain unassessed.
Resident duty Activation Configurations Resident gap empty
All declared conditions,
both people
Original, 12 h None 187 55 45
Original, 12 h Automatic 5,270 2,644 2,618
Original, 12 h On filing 5,270 2,628 2,618
Early threat, 3 h None 187 0 0
Early threat, 3 h Automatic 5,270 742 716
Early threat, 3 h On filing 5,270 52 52
The original-duty rows illustrate why an apparent improvement in one projection need not improve the conjunction: automatic
protection closes sixteen additional resident gaps relative to filing activation, but those cells still fail other declared conditions. In
the early-threat rows, automatic and filing activation leave substantially different zero-gap regions. Their numerical proportions
have no population interpretation. Adding more early or late endpoint settings would change those proportions without
improving an actual institution.
fig. 22 instead fixes response at 20 h and resident readiness at 6 h. The early-threat filing panel has no empty-gap region: even
a band declared to begin at 3 h waits for the resident’s feasible filing at 6 h. Automatic activation can cover that initial interval.
The selected traces also preserve the earlier H06/H07 distinction: ending at 19 h or starting at 13 h leaves one uncovered
hour in different places. An endpoint display therefore complements the requirement order; duration alone would collapse the
distinction it was designed to preserve.
The atlas also sharpens an objection to its own use. An authority could define the consequence narrowly, begin notice after
an earlier deprivation, exclude an affected person from the roster or require a form of readiness the person disputes, and then
display an empty waiting gap. That would change what the model is allowed to see. Tully’s challenge is therefore more than a
request for another variable: the procedures and criteria of reasonable argument remain contestable, while ostensibly inclusive
negotiation can be governed through agenda and resource control ( Tully, 2006, pp. 25–27, 30–31). The figures cannot answer
that challenge on an authority’s behalf.
A defensible use must let an opponent dispute the threat, notice origin, claimant roster, horizon and activation rule. A
changed commitment calls for a new declared input epoch, and a different grid or roster requires a further schema rather than
an unrecorded substitution. Refusal of the offered forum must not be silently coded as late readiness or collective consent.
The recorded provider, funding obligation, expiry and interruption remedy also need evidence outside these stipulated clocks.
Pettit’s independent appeal and Shachar’s agreed review standard remain additional institutional premises; distinct office names
and a punctual response do not establish either ( Pettit, 2005, pp. 8–9; Shachar, 2005, pp. 75–77, especially p. 76 n. 90). The
contribution is an inspectable conditional claim: under these declared duties, this person remains exposed at these times. Its
terms remain open to challenge by those it represents.
5.8 A selected-line collation keeps the limit of the corpus visible
There is a textual reason to keep these material questions attached to particular witnesses. At Jerusalem 73:46, the ASU
transcription reads howl in the line about the Spectres around Los’s porches. The retained mixed/editorial Erdman page,
erdman:239 (printed E229), instead supplies bowl. Inspection of that selected line on the bound Library of Congress copy I
sheet agrees with howl. This localizes the earlier D02 discrepancy; it does not silently repair the retained page or change its
source role. The corpus pin and the original discrepancy record remain unchanged.
The selected provision line in Q23 agrees between the ASU text and the retained E229 page under whitespace-only comparison.
At Q38, the three selected lines about misdirected vengeance likewise agree with the retained E194 page, while its embedded
39

## Page 40

Figure 21: Response and completed readiness in 1,122 stipulated cells. Two duty rows retain resident-b’s consequences at 12 h and 3
h; columns show no, automatic and filing-activated protection. Each 17 by 11 panel shows resident-b’s uncovered integer hours on a
common 0-24 h scale; the adjacent strip retains member-a separately. A cross marks readiness after inclusive closing at 8 h, including a
zero-exposure cell with failed access. Protected bands start at the resident consequence and expire at 20 h for each person; activation is
computed individually. All intervals are half open. The complete union has 21,454 configurations and 42,908 person records; 102 cells
belong to both slices. These are parameter cells, not observed institutions; all four practical relations remain unassessed.
40

## Page 41

Figure 22: Position of protection in 1,200 endpoint cells at response 20 h and resident readiness 6 h. Each triangle contains the 300
bands 0 <= start < end <= 24; invalid bands are grey exclusions, not zeros. Colours distinguish empty, initial, terminal, two-component
and wholly uncovered waits for resident-b. 4 selected two-person timelines retain their exact cell identities and expose member-a
separately. The original-duty [13,20) and [12,19) bands leave resident gaps [12,13) and [19,20); the early-threat [3,20) band leaves a
filing-triggered [3,6) gap versus empty automatic exposure. These anchors extend existing H/P contrasts to the declared two-person
grid; they are not rediscovered observations or an across-duty ranking. No gap colour establishes practical safety or legitimacy.
41

## Page 42

line counters and page apparatus remain outside the selected span. This is a bounded comparison of specified lines. The copy I
image check concerns the selected line on plate 73; no new whole-copy collation or image check of plate 45 is claimed. Modern
editorial/extraction matter does not become Blake-primary merely because one passage has been checked.
The distinction matters for the argument as well as for retrieval. Plate 73 places provision amid hunger, feuding and the
continued work of the furnaces; it does not present an administrative population whose conflicts have already been resolved.
Plate 45 makes the inadequacy of a target for vengeance part of Los’s lament. Together they press the reconstruction to ask
what continues while a claim remains unsettled and where the burden of a remedy falls. Neither a corrected word nor an exactly
calculated interval answers who is authorized to govern. They make the evidence and the proposed decision more answerable
to the particulars they might otherwise absorb [ Blake (n.d.b), 45:25–38, E194; 73:34–54, E228–229].
6 Plural peoples, overlapping powers and the conditions of non-domination
Nicolaïdis’s demoicracy is the closest concise comparator: plural peoples acting jointly without fusion into one demos. Her
normative benchmark is not a description of every European practice, and an extension to overlapping intra-state nations
requires new argument. Equal standing among peoples and equal influence among persons can conflict. The project must
defend voting rules rather than promise that all forms of equality coincide. ( Nicolaïdis, 2013).
Nicolaïdis distinguishes a normative benchmark from observed European practice, develops recognition among demoi, and
addresses voting, rights, mediation and accountability ( Nicolaïdis, 2013, author ms. pp. 7–16). Joint rule concerns the terms
on which people remain capable of governing together. Mutual recognition must therefore confront the control of dissenters
within each constituent people as well as relations among its governing bodies.
Kymlicka’s author synopsis differentiates minority-rights claims, while Shachar’s joint-governance article examines authority
sharing and vulnerable insiders ( Kymlicka, 1995, author synopsis; Shachar, 2005, pp. 71–77). Together they prevent recognition
of a nation from becoming an undifferentiated entitlement to govern everyone classified within it. Exit cannot substitute for
voice when departure costs housing, livelihood, language access or family relations. ( Kymlicka, 1995); ( Shachar, 2001).
Bauböck supplies a direct challenge to national-cultural autonomy based on politically consequential registers. A nominal
choice among permitted identities may still impose exclusive identification, exclude mixed or new affiliations, and entangle
franchise or taxation. Open cultural association and public jurisdiction must remain different relations. This objection cannot
be answered by renaming an exclusive register fluid. ( Bauböck, 2001).
Bauböck distinguishes cultural liberty, recognition and political autonomy, then examines consequential registers and the
exclusion of multiple identification ( Bauböck, 2001, PDF pp. 3–7, 21–26). A many-to-many cultural map leaves the franchise
unsettled. A full public vote for every affiliation may duplicate influence; one compulsory final affiliation restores exclusivity
at the point of decision. The response has to distinguish equal general representation from several limited memberships and
defend its fiscal effects and provision for unrecognized people.
Ostrom’s polycentric governance asks about rules and performance; Hooghe and Marks distinguish general-purpose and task-
specific architectures. Neither turns a cultural nation into a functional jurisdiction. Overlap can enable adaptation or diffuse
responsibility. Water, labor, housing and revenue may resist tidy decomposition. Their historical California illustrations are
not current evaluations of California institutions. ( Ostrom, 2010); ( Hooghe and Marks , 2003).
Ostrom treats property as a bundle of rights and develops design principles as contextual regularities rather than universal
rules ( Ostrom, 2010, pp. 651–653). This shifts the comparison from the number of governing bodies to the rules that organize
entry, information, decisions, benefits and sanctions. A watershed authority must be assessed through those relations and the
resource it governs.
Hooghe and Marks distinguish general-purpose Type I from task-specific Type II arrangements. Nonintersecting Type I
memberships can coexist with overlapping competencies; Type II bodies often operate within Type I settings and have variable
franchises ( Hooghe and Marks , 2003, pp. 233–241, especially p. 237 n. 6). Stable territorial citizenship can therefore coexist
with shared water competence, while a functional body can still exclude affected residents from its electorate. Boundary overlap
and democratic inclusion are separate questions.
Treaty federalism raises a prior question: a people may contest the federation’s authority to incorporate it. This concerns the
source of jurisdiction, rather than simply the range of cultural choices available within an accepted state. It changes what
counts as agreement to the common institutions ( Henderson, 2019; Simpson, 2007).
Henderson treats treaty federalism as constitutive of Canadian authority, rather than an added minority concession. Inherent
powers and continuing treaty relationships lead into a territorial account of treaty governance and proposals for structural
and fiscal change ( Henderson, 2019, pp. 21–41). His institutional argument contains a consequential tension: direct treaty
representation could lessen reliance on consent, consultation and accommodation (p. 38), while consolidation requires each
Treaty Nation’s legitimate consent (p. 40). Representation and agreement therefore have to be distinguished within the design
itself.
A federation cannot prove its title by first classifying every people as one of its constituents. Authority to recognize and
allocate powers may itself be contested. The proposed record therefore needs a jurisdictional remainder : a question not
42

## Page 43

presumed resolved when other fields are completed. This is our term. A people may negotiate without conceding that the
forum originates its standing. Affiliation, residence, property claims, public competence and treaty relations remain separately
describable, but decomposition does not make them materially independent. Dividing a land relationship into a language
service and a water entitlement may discard the very claim under dispute.
A delegate’s presence, a mandate to negotiate, assent to a particular agreement and a continuing power to reopen it also differ.
An ordinary shared decision cannot promise every person’s agreement, yet a general majority cannot be assumed to dispose of
every jurisdictional claim. The institutional task is to identify the form of agreement required for a decision and defend whose
agreement counts. This proposed burden of justification remains contestable.
The UN Declaration connects self-determination and institutions (Articles 3–5), participation and consultation toward consent
(18–19), land and redress (25–28), projects and institutions (32–35), and cross-border relations and treaties (36–37). Its sex-
equality and human-rights provisions, alongside the territorial-integrity language of Article 46, require these claims to be read
together ( United Nations General Assembly , 2007, Articles 3–5, 18–19, 25–28, 32–37, 44, 46). A classification record must
identify which relation and which decision are at issue.
Pettit’s account makes non-capture more demanding than freedom from actual punishment. Dependency persists when someone
controls access to housing, work or essential services, even if that power is exercised benevolently. Protection from private power
and control of the protective state are separate requirements ( Pettit, 2012, pp. 3–10). A new appeals authority must therefore
be assessed for the power it acquires as well as the protection it promises.
Pettit also distinguishes collective electoral authorization from the control retained by persons in their plurality. Reactive,
representative and regulative contestation require public reasons and effective correction; representatives can nevertheless
become lobbies, and appeals depend on impartiality ( Pettit, 2005, pp. 1–4, 8–14). Voice, practical exit and revision impose
different demands: a forum must hear challenges, a person needs means to leave, and rules must be open to change.
The relevant capacity is the power to make a challenge change what an authority may do. Pettit’s account includes procedures
that constrain decisions before a person must appeal ( Pettit, 2005, pp. 9–14). Shachar makes this concrete by proposing review
as a condition of enforceability in family-law arbitration, with an agreed standard and an identified reviewing body ( Shachar,
2005, pp. 75–77 and p. 76 nn. 89–90). Applied to the hypothetical watershed, the comparison specifies who initiates scrutiny,
who pays, what happens to essential provision during delay and whether relief can alter the allocation. A procedure that
requires workers to risk their wages before it operates may preserve the dependency it promises to remedy.
The contribution is a critical grammar joining nonidentity, national generation and imaginative passage to specific institutional
transitions. Demoicracy supplies joint rule among plural peoples; autonomy and non-domination supply tests of power. Blake
supplies a demanding account of the person who exceeds a present state. The proposed record asks where those accounts agree,
where their demands conflict and what decision follows.
6.1 An institutional comparator: two chambers, resources and remedies
The Swiss constitutional text examined here makes several equalities coexist through different institutions. Population-based
representation in the National Council operates alongside a separate cantonal representation rule in the Council of States;
federal parliamentary decisions require both chambers’ agreement. Political rights cannot be exercised contemporaneously in
several Cantons. Financial autonomy has its own provisions for sufficient resources and equalization ( Swiss Confederation ,
2024, arts. 39(3), 47(2), 135, 149–150, 156(2)). This historical English text, consolidated to 1 January 2024, identifies choices
for the proposed federation: which units receive collective representation, how population affects influence, and how poorer
participants obtain means to govern.
Collective voice differs from a person’s access to protection. The text ties the federal political franchise to Swiss citizenship
and eligibility while providing procedural guarantees to every person, subject to specified conditions and exceptions ( Swiss
Confederation, 2024, arts. 29–29a, 136). Participation in an allocation hearing, access to legal assistance, a vote and a
collective jurisdictional claim do different work. In the drought case, the federation must say which powers reach a migrant
worker and what support makes them usable. Cantonal seats supply no answer to that question, and the court’s jurisdiction
and applicable-law provisions delimit the available remedy ( Swiss Confederation , 2024, arts. 189–190).
The comparison separates territorial constituent units from cultural nations. It also exposes a substantive limit on treating
any federation as a pluralist exemplar: Article 72(3) prohibits minarets ( Swiss Confederation , 2024, art. 72(3)). Institutional
diversity has to be examined alongside specific exclusions. Treaty relations pose the further question of the federation’s title to
decide, which a cantonal analogy does not settle.
6.2 Revising the procedures of recognition
Tully places the governing procedure within the dispute. His dialogical approach allows challenges to norms of recognition and
to the procedures through which those norms are negotiated; reasonable disagreement need not disappear after a settlement
(Tully, 2006, pp. 24–27). This supplies a more demanding interpretation of revision than an amendment field. A person can
have a route to appeal while being forbidden to challenge the categories that made the decision possible. The reconstruction
43

## Page 44

should distinguish correcting a mistaken classification, changing its consequences, revising the classification rule and contesting
the institution’s authority to impose that rule. Success at one level cannot be presumed to settle the others.
Non-finality does not require every decision to wait for unanimity. Tully distinguishes dialogue from decision-making and
retains other institutions as checks where negotiation leaves minorities vulnerable. He also asks whether ostensibly inclusive
negotiations are governed at a distance through their agendas and resource inequalities ( Tully, 2006, pp. 29–31). Our response
must therefore specify how an act can bind provisionally while its basis remains contestable. A decision could have an effective
date, a review trigger and continuing protective duties without declaring that participation ratifies the forum’s entire jurisdiction.
Equally, repeated negotiation should not allow those who control essential resources to postpone relief indefinitely. A timetable
distributes power when some parties can survive delay and others cannot.
National continuity and public contestation need different guarantees. A nation may sustain language, institutions and a
claim to self-government across generations; a public may organize around one controversy and dissolve when its work changes.
Giving each public a constituent veto would allow organizational multiplication to reorder the federation without a defended rule.
Giving only established nations agenda rights would let inherited recognition suppress emerging opposition. A possible division
would protect collective self-government through specified competences while securing direct channels for people contesting their
exercise. Its legitimacy would depend on the relation between the two, including who may reopen their boundaries. Neither
the age of an institution nor the novelty of its challengers determines that answer.
In the hypothetical drought, this would separate three questions currently liable to collapse. Workers need drinking water
and a practicable role in decisions affecting their lives. A Treaty Nation may contest the watershed body’s title to allocate
water. Residents may challenge an upstream association’s control of storage while declining membership in it. These claims
concern intersecting material relations but do not carry identical warrants. A temporary provision agreement should identify
who undertakes the duty, who funds it, what participation authorizes and which jurisdictional claims remain unsettled. The
preservation of a claim cannot itself supply water; the supply of water cannot silently extinguish the claim.
Remaining together consequently requires more than portable standing and toleration of disagreement. Participants need
means to develop opposition, powers through which it can affect decisions and routes to contest the procedures that distribute
those powers. They may continue to disagree about the federation’s story, their own representative institutions and the proper
source of common authority. Composition without capture names a defensible task only if these disagreements can alter the
arrangement while people retain the conditions of participation. Its political value lies in exposing the points where such
alteration is blocked, including by the reconstruction’s own account of reconciliation.
7 Five Xeno-California conflicts: standing, resources and counterfactual re-
pair
Xeno-California comprises five hypothetical conflicts over territory, cross-border affiliation, new publics, civic rank and scarce
water. Each has two machine-readable alternatives with stipulated differences in institutional design. Land, labor, infrastructure,
power and affected nonmembers remain part of the decision being compared.
Case A places several nations and unaffiliated residents in one territory. The bounded alternative grounds common services
and ordinary political standing in personhood and residence while permitting language and cultural institutions. The capture
alternative requires one exclusive national registration to obtain those services. The relevant evidence in a future study would
include effective access, internal dissent and representation, not the number of recognized organizations.
Case B places one national community across jurisdictions. A limited cultural agreement can coordinate institutions without
moving borders or licensing universal control over co-nationals. The capture alternative treats the association’s national claim
as authority over every affiliate everywhere. The issuer’s level, the agreement’s reach and the body able to enforce it must be
separately specified. Territorial institutions retain duties to residents who reject the cultural organization.
Case C asks how a new generation becomes a public. Recognition need not require common descent or imitation of a constitu-
tional list of old nations. But a new public’s cultural claims do not automatically generate taxing, policing or secession powers.
The rejected alternative infers coercive competence from an asserted eternal-state interpretation. A future mechanism must
distinguish opportunities to organize, public recognition, representation and authorized powers.
Case D refuses a civic hierarchy of vision. Officials who classify a community as fourfold cannot infer that it deserves leadership
over a supposedly single-vision community. Changing from three to four or six interpretive lenses in the prototype leaves
admissibility unchanged. That software control establishes only the absence of a programmed lens-count entitlement; it does
not validate any interpretation of fourfold vision.
Case E involves a wealthy national association seeking fiscal autonomy, an Indigenous community with land and water claims,
migrant labor without association membership, and downstream affected residents. A meaningful alternative identifies duties,
standing, public finance, ability to pay, essential access, residual risks and review. The capture alternative excludes nonmem-
bers, leaves costs unspecified and absorbs treaty/refusal issues into ordinary association membership. The checks reject those
omissions under proposed norms.
44

## Page 45

The resource case also needs comparison beyond the two diagnostic examples: ordinary territorial administration, asymmetric
multinational arrangements and a hybrid task-specific authority may each have advantages and failures. Future empirical work
must hold material conditions explicit and examine the actual procedures, rather than define the preferred hybrid as freer. A
complete record is a prerequisite for criticism, not a substitute for it.
7.1 Care, work and the allocation of material burdens
Labour well the Minute Particulars, attend to the Little-ones:
And those who are in misery cannot remain so long
If we do but our duty: labour well the teeming Earth.
Q16. William Blake, Jerusalem 55:51–53, E205. ( Blake, n.d.b).
The address turns attention toward work on particular lives and the teeming earth. Its preceding preference for preventing
misery gives that work a time horizon: support should arrive before an avoidable injury. Its sequence joins preventing misery,
attending to the vulnerable and cultivating land. These are different institutional tasks: an appeal route does not supply water,
and recognized membership does not pay wages. The Xeno-California comparison therefore holds scarcity in view while asking
which arrangement funds provision, assigns residual risk and lets affected people challenge the allocation.
He who would do good to another, must do it in Minute Particulars
General Good is the plea of the scoundrel hypocrite flatterer:
For Art & Science cannot exist but in minutely organized Particulars
And not in generalizing Demonstrations of the Rational Power.
Q17. William Blake, Jerusalem 55:60–63, E205. ( Blake, n.d.b).
Blake pairs Art and Science with minutely organized particulars. The preceding command to compel demonstration and melt
indefinites in affliction (55:56–59) also exposes the danger of making evidence into an instrument of coercion. The contrast
concerns the relation of a general claim to the work that sustains it. A water board can invoke a common good while concealing
downstream costs; an identity association can celebrate mutual aid while assigning unpaid work to selected members. The
decision record makes those distributions explicit. Its particulars are affected persons, quantities, duties, payers and remedies.
Yet the Reasoner commanded to demonstrate is not already a claimant in our filing procedure. The subsequent lines place
definite identity and the continuing destruction of falsehood beside the attack on generalizing demonstration. One possible
reading therefore makes precise exposure of a claim’s commitments part of release, rather than treating every formal demand
as domination ( Blake, n.d.b, 55:56–65, E205). The timing atlas can serve that limited purpose: it makes a protective promise
definite enough to expose where it fails. It loses that value if the authority uses its own definite terms to settle who may question
the promise. Prevention and compelled demonstration share the scene; neither becomes a simple administrative doctrine. The
return to Q16–Q17 adds no new quotation record or whole-work reading credit.
7.2 Release and attachment: changing the conditions of work and dependence
Moyer reads Blake’s textile imagery across Visions, America, The Four Zoas, Milton and Jerusalem as a relation between
metropolitan labor and plantation slavery. His comparison follows the production process and its distribution of power, rather
than treating every reference to weaving as a single symbol. It suggests a complementary corpus search: follow work, employ-
ment, buying, chains and daughters alongside national names. The question is who compels activity, possesses its products
and can interrupt the arrangement ( Moyer, 2014, paras. 3–10, 14–16, 33).
America’s emancipation sequence keeps a family’s first steps within the scene of release:
Rise and look out, his chains are loose, his dungeon doors are open.
And let his wife and children return from the opressors scourge;
They look behind at every step & believe it is a dream.
Q39. William Blake, America a Prophecy 6:10–12, E53. ( Blake, n.d.a).
The opened door begins rather than completes the action. Wife and children return from the scourge, yet look behind at every
step: release has to become credible in movement. The proclamation from the temple is subsequently identified by Albion’s
Angel as Orc’s voice, which Orc affirms; it is not a statement by Washington ( Blake, n.d.a, 5:7–8:1, E53–54). Its visionary
dawn brings the claim that empire has ended into conflict with the conditions through which national freedom is proclaimed.
In the institutional construction, an employer’s retained wages, withheld documents or threats to dependants can preserve the
old power after an exit is formally granted. Passage needs usable means, a timetable and protection against retaliation. The
decision record names the provider of those means and preserves claims against the act that created the dependency.
Jerusalem 59 combines affirmative feeling with an exhausting division of labor. The daughters work through hunger and
interrupted sleep; they also take delight in their work and continue repairing their wheels. Their attachment does not resolve
who receives its benefits or who can change its terms.
45

## Page 46

Figure 23: Jerusalem 55, copy I. The Seven Eyes, plowing and care for the Little-ones share the sheet with minutely organized Art
and Science. Q16–Q17 select lines 51–53 and 60–63: care, particulars and demonstration enter the same account of labor. The complete
lower design keeps provision beside the demand to explain and demonstrate. LOC, Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103; posthumous
impression, approximately 1832?.
Yet the intoxicating delight that they take in their work
Obliterates every other evil; none pities their tears
Yet they regard not pity & they expect no one to pity
For they labour for life & love, regardless of any one
But the poor Spectres that they work for, always incessantly
Q25. William Blake, Jerusalem 59:34–38, E209. ( Blake, n.d.b).
Read beside the provision at Los’s porches in plate 73, this scene asks whether assistance changes recipients’ capacities or
sustains a laboring dependence. The institutional question is whether participants can interrupt the work, contest its allocation
and redirect its benefits while retaining food, shelter and standing. Continued participation and a shared language of love do
not answer that question [ Blake (n.d.b), 59:26–55, E209; 73:44–54, E229].
Moyer’s juxtaposition of this labor with Blake’s Moore & Co. textile advertisement also makes genre and commission conse-
quential. A commercial image of national industry and a prophetic representation of its costs may belong to one maker without
asserting the same position. Search results need the work’s address and production setting as well as its author. The decision
record extends that question to collective images: who commissions the image of a public, whom does it address, and whose
work sustains its authority ( Moyer, 2014, paras. 18–24)?
7.3 Desolating taxation makes the distribution of burdens a federal question
The ending of Jerusalem returns from visionary conversation to the political economy of nations:
Where are the Kingdoms of the World & all their glory that grew on Desolation
The Fruit of Albions Poverty Tree when the Triple Headed Gog-Magog Giant
Of Albion Taxed the Nations into Desolation & then gave the Spectrous Oath
Such is the Cry from all the Earth from the Living Creatures of the Earth
And from the great City of Golgonooza in the Shadowy Generation
And from the Thirty-two Nations of the Earth among the Living Creatures
Q36. William Blake, Jerusalem 98:51–56, E258. ( Blake, n.d.b).
The question joins kingdoms’ glory to the desolation on which it grew. “Albions Poverty Tree” makes deprivation productive for
power, while the cry passes through living creatures, Golgonooza and the nations. National plurality survives in this account of
transformed relations; recognition alone does not answer the complaint against extraction. A water levy must therefore disclose
who pays, who benefits, whose livelihood is threatened and who can obtain a remedy before deprivation makes a hearing useless.
46

## Page 47

Figure 24: Jerusalem 59, copy I. The central wheel and paired figures divide a sheet whose lower text follows the daughters’ labor,
hunger, delight and repair of their tools. The typeset excerpt selects lines 34–38 from this longer scene; the surrounding sheet keeps the
labor process visible. LOC, Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103; posthumous impression, approximately 1832?.
This reading directs attention to the distribution of burdens. Shared provision still requires revenue: the decision record states
its purpose, issuer, competence warrant, affected reach and challenge route. The point of comparison is whether a common
charge sustains the conditions of participation or consumes them ( Blake, n.d.b, 98:41–56, E258; Ostrom, 2010, pp. 653–663;
Pettit, 2005, pp. 8–14).
7.4 A worked material conflict
Suppose, solely for comparison, a drought requires reduced withdrawals. A prosperous cultural association owns upstream stor-
age; a Treaty Nation contests the source of the authority’s jurisdiction; migrant workers need safe drinking water and wages;
downstream residents bear ecological and health risks. These are stipulated parties, not claims about named California com-
munities. Collective identities neither determine hydrology nor distribute costs. A proposal must identify existing obligations,
evidence of scarcity, infrastructure control and the bodies authorized to negotiate or decide.
Alternative E1 gives recognized associations exclusive representation. It appears plural because several peoples have seats. It
nevertheless excludes people outside the rolls, may misidentify a Treaty Nation as another voluntary club and can let wealth
buy agenda control. Adding a ceremonial fourth seat or calling the board fourfold changes none of these defects. The failure
concerns distribution of power, information and exposure, not symbolic diversity.
Alternative E2 creates one territorial rule with equal per-person voting. It protects a general franchise and avoids duplicating
votes through affiliations. It can still subordinate a treaty relationship to an ordinary majority and conceal unequal starting
entitlements to storage. Uniform procedure may govern an unequal baseline. The question concerns which equality is specified
and whether the body imposing it has established its jurisdiction.
Alternative E3 gives a watershed body limited competence while requiring separately identified treaty negotiations, general
resident standing, worker representation, public hydrological evidence and review. It distinguishes emergency drinking-water
protection from longer-term allocation and compensation, identifies who can revise rules and assigns compliance costs. This
alternative places a further burden on the comparison: Multiple forums may slow action, fragment accountability or let powerful
actors move disputes to favorable venues. Emergency powers can endure; appeal costs can exclude.
Comparison must keep physical scarcity and the resource baseline explicit while changing institutional rules. It should record
access to water, costs, ability to secure a hearing, ability to survive delay and power to revise the arrangement. Essential
provision cannot depend on buying national membership. Translation needs funding, reciprocal language access and limits
protecting knowledge a people has reason not to disclose. Affected-person standing must confront rather than silently override
self-determination. Counting affected individuals does not settle a treaty-specific jurisdictional dispute.
47

## Page 48

The record separates storage owner as property holder, supplier as service provider, watershed body as claimant of competence,
and each enforcement actor. A valid scarcity measurement does not establish power to impose a levy; a valid levy does not
establish that the board speaks every person’s national identity. A successful cultural interpretation supplies neither warrant.
The institutional test locates these transitions so opponents can dispute them.
A further test concerns interim protection while the watershed body’s title is disputed. Who must keep water flowing, who
can survive delay, and which emergency measure protects life without being treated as a permanent settlement of title? A
protective order may be demanded by a worker while its forum is rejected by a Treaty Nation. Neither the urgency nor the
objection automatically disposes of the other warrant. Compare the wealthy association’s and the worker’s ability to obtain
interim relief under the same scarcity. Record the temporary duty, evidence, funding, duration and procedure for revisiting the
act. No current California facts or legal holdings are supplied by this invented scenario.
Follow the work needed to keep E3’s challenge alive: notice, translation, emergency supply, evidence gathering and a decision
about interruption. If carers and workers perform those tasks informally while recognized bodies control the budget, plural
representation can preserve the same dependence. A provisional provision agreement should identify minimum service, supplier,
payment and review date separately from the disputed allocation. A worker can demand continuity without speaking for a
Treaty Nation; that nation can contest jurisdiction without becoming responsible for every resident’s subsistence. Participation
authorizes the defined undertaking recorded, while other claims remain open.
The executable E-bounded and E-capture records test the stated safeguards. The E1–E3 comparison in fig. 25 extends the
argument by varying representation, decision scope and treaty relations while keeping the hypothetical scarcity in view.
Definition 7 (A stipulated rule trace). Let 𝑟𝑘(𝑑) ∈ {0, 1} be the result of safeguard predicate 𝑘 for a supplied decision,
with 𝐾 = 15 in this implementation. The prototype’s verdict is the conjunction
𝑇 (𝑑) =
𝐾
⋀
𝑘=1
𝑟𝑘(𝑑). (7)
The trace records every predicate and its trigger state. It reports which explicit safeguards are satisfied, failed or inactive for
the supplied record.
Proposition 5 (Invariance under excluded descriptive labels). Write 𝑑 = (𝑥, ℓ) , where 𝑥 retains all tested safeguard
and warrant fields and ℓ contains only the descriptive poetic-state and national-affiliation labels excluded from those predicates.
If every 𝑟𝑘 depends only on 𝑥, then
𝑇 (𝑥, ℓ) = 𝑇 (𝑥, ℓ′) for all admissible ℓ, ℓ′. (8)
Proof. Substituting either label assignment leaves each predicate unchanged; their conjunction in eq. 7 is therefore unchanged.
The poetry-as-sole-warrant flag is held fixed in 𝑥, not erased with a descriptive label. The ten saved comparisons instantiate
this structural control while retaining the poetry-as-warrant field.
The matrix in fig. 26 displays every programmed result. Open black marks record active satisfied predicates, filled red marks
locate violations, and grey dashes identify conditions absent from a record. This makes the reason for each synthetic verdict
visible alongside the descriptor-removal result of Proposition 5 .
7.5 Counterfactual repair with the material dispute held fixed
The finite experiment applies a declared catalog of twelve safeguard interventions to each of the ten records. It preserves
the subject, institutional identities, action label, affected people, affected nonmembers, coercion, resource-decision status and
treaty/refusal trigger. An operator acts only when its associated rule fails. For example, nonmember standing repairs a
recorded exclusion; it cannot make the excluded people disappear. Charter and competence operators insert explicitly synthetic
procedural terms whose values remain visible in the result.
The baseline has 118 active checks: 107 satisfied and 11 failed. Thirty-two conditional checks have absent triggers. The revised
matrix displays all three states. This accounting distinguishes an exercised safeguard from a condition that the record never
encounters.
48

## Page 49

Figure 25: A fixed water-scarcity dispute supports three proposed authorization routes: associations, territory and limited watershed
competence. The upper arrows describe storage and supply relationships; the columns compare franchise, mandate, treaty treatment
and the question each arrangement must answer. Residents, workers and affected nonmembers retain claims concerning costs, hearings
and interim supply under every route. Compare each route with Q37’s question of unequal burdens under a common rule and Q38’s
question of whom a remedy reaches. E1–E3 are alternative constructions within the hypothetical resource case.
49

## Page 50

Figure 26: Which safeguard fails, and under which trigger? All fifteen safeguards are shown for ten stipulated records, paired as
bounded (+) and capture (-) alternatives. Open circles mark active satisfied checks, red crossed circles active violations and grey dashes
absent trigger conditions. Right-margin fractions divide violations by active checks for each predicate; the lower per-record triplets
retain satisfied, violated and absent counts. Across the 150 cells, these reconcile to 107 active satisfied, 11 violated and 32
condition-absent checks.
50

## Page 51

Definition 8 (A finite safeguard-repair family). Let 𝒪 be the twelve declared interventions, 𝐹 (𝑑) the failed-rule set of
decision 𝑑, and 𝑑𝐵 the record obtained by applying 𝐵 ⊆ 𝒪 in the catalog’s fixed order. The catalog preserves a protected
context 𝜋 containing the material and jurisdictional triggers. Define
𝒜(𝑑) = {𝐵 ⊆ 𝒪 ∶ 𝐹 (𝑑 𝐵) = ∅}, 𝑚(𝑑) = min
𝐵∈𝒜(𝑑)
|𝐵|. (9)
The minimum is undefined when 𝒜(𝑑) is empty. A bundle is inclusion-minimal when none of its proper subsets belongs to 𝒜(𝑑).
Distinct subsets may produce the same record because an inactive operator makes no change. The report therefore records
both subset count and distinct resulting-record count, and verifies 𝜋(𝑑𝐵) = 𝜋(𝑑) throughout the family.
There are 212 = 4, 096 subsets per decision and 40,960 overall. They produce 31 distinct records, of which the five bounded
baselines each contribute one. The five capture records contribute eight, four, two, four and eight. A total of 25,600 subsets
satisfy all programmed predicates. This subset total includes many selections of inactive operators; distinct records give the
operational denominator.
Separating the baseline classes changes the interpretation of the total: the five already-admissible records contribute 20,480
admissible subsets, while the five capture records contribute 5,120 of their 20,480 subsets. The latter fraction is 25%; the
aggregate fraction is 62.5%. Each capture record has one inclusion-minimal repair bundle, and every admissible selection
contains that bundle. Its count is therefore 212−𝑚(𝑑), where 𝑚(𝑑) is the minimum in eq. 9. An independent upper-set calculation
reconstructs the complete size profile from those bundles and reconciles every bin with the recorded experiment. The fraction
records selections from a declared catalog; changing the catalog changes that denominator.
Each capture alternative has one inclusion-minimal bundle. A requires equal personhood, open affiliation and supported exit;
B requires non-capture and contestation; C requires the charter intervention; D requires unranked rights and equal personhood;
E requires nonmember standing, burden allocation and treaty/refusal treatment (fig. 27). Every bounded alternative has the
empty bundle. The result makes the designed deficits visible and identifies exactly which recorded changes address them.
7.6 Complementarity appears at admission, not as an extra resolved rule
B’s two changes illustrate the difference between repairing a field and obtaining an admissible conjunction. Non-capture repairs
one failed predicate; contestation repairs another. Neither alone admits B, while the pair does. D has the same structure for
unranked rights and equal personhood. The baseline pair interaction in the admission indicator is positive for those two pairs.
Each pair resolves exactly the union of the single-operator failures: its resolved-rule excess is zero.
Definition 9 (Admission complementarity for two interventions). For interventions 𝑖 and 𝑗, define
Δ𝑖𝑗(𝑑) = 𝑇 (𝑑 {𝑖,𝑗}) − 𝑇 (𝑑{𝑖}) − 𝑇 (𝑑{𝑗}) + 𝑇 (𝑑), (10)
where 𝑇 is the conjunction in eq. 7. Positive Δ𝑖𝑗 means the pair achieves admission beyond its separate baseline effects. This
concerns the conjunction, so it can occur when the two interventions resolve disjoint failures.
A shared-field diagnostic shows why the minimum bundle must be computed rather than inferred from the number of failures.
With an interpretive warrant and blank competence source, both POETRY_TO_POWER and AUTHORITY_GAP fail. The
charter operator can repair both by supplying the stipulated warrant and its source. Three structural type rules lie outside the
repair catalog; a mistyped issuer remains irreparable even after every available intervention. The software retains both controls.
Its search reports the minimum over the declared operations, making the scope of repair explicit.
Proposition 6 (A sufficient condition for monotone repair). Suppose each intervention 𝑓𝑖 acts on a failure-set repre-
sentation, satisfies 𝑓𝑖(𝐹 ) ⊆ 𝐹 , and is order-preserving: 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐺 implies 𝑓𝑖(𝐹 ) ⊆ 𝑓 𝑖(𝐺). Apply selected operators in one fixed
catalog order, substituting the identity for unselected operators. Then 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐵 ′ implies 𝐹 (𝑑𝐵′) ⊆ 𝐹 (𝑑 𝐵); every superset of an
admissible bundle is admissible.
Proof. Compare the two executions at each catalog position. Initially their failure sets agree. If both select the operator,
order preservation maintains inclusion; if only 𝐵′ selects it, contraction maintains inclusion; if neither selects it, nothing
changes. Induction through the catalog proves the result. The actual field-based implementation is checked by complete finite
enumeration for the supplied records. Its observed monotonicity is recorded independently of this sufficient abstract criterion.
This formal structure identifies the next institutional comparison. A repair bundle specifies which commitments must be
implemented together; the shared-field control identifies when one institutional change serves several safeguards. Studying an
actual forum then asks whether those commitments can coexist in appointments, finance, interim provision and enforceable
remedies. The computational output is the explicit bundle to investigate.
51

## Page 52

Figure 27: A repair must change the relevant fields. Minimum repairs and complete bundle-size profiles for five failed synthetic records
under twelve declared interventions. Each row gives exact minimum operator IDs, cardinality, minimum-bundle count, admissible
subsets out of 4,096 and distinct resulting records including inadmissible outcomes. In each size-0–12 strip, grey gives the full tested
denominator and black height gives the admissible/tested fraction at that size. These are ratios of enumerated subsets. Totals cover all
ten baselines: 25,600 admissible subsets of 40,960 and 31 distinct records. The five failing baselines contribute 5,120 admissible subsets
of 20,480; already-admissible baselines supply the remaining 20,480. Action labels, affected populations and material obligations remain
fixed.
52

## Page 53

Figure 28: Two proposed routes can produce the same outward agreement. One connects challengeable reasons, supported
participation and effective review; the other connects controlled recognition, conditional access and continuing exposure to power. The
curved connections identify a shared observation rather than a measured effect. Contesting the act while retaining provision
distinguishes the institutional questions that agreement alone leaves open.
8 Agreement under translation or dependency: testing the scale-freedom in-
ference
Rahman’s Myth of Objectivity profile proposes that broader cultural models can influence subordinate inference ( Rahman, 2025,
pp. 124–130). We use this speculative proposal to construct a counter-model: a federation may widen contextual understanding
while strengthening conformity to a dominant prior.
Coordination and dissent protection therefore need separate outcomes. Agreement can emerge from accessible reasons and
revision, or from raising the cost of challenge. The agreement routes in fig. 28 draw this distinction: the endpoint looks similar,
but the available paths differ.
The comparison separates communication control, information asymmetry and the material consequences of dissent. It asks
who sets the shared terms, whose disagreement is treated as noise, and whether a person can survive the cost of challenge. The
prototype keeps rights and safeguards independent of affiliation count. The opposition described in Q40 supplies a question for
the upper route: can a challenge change the framing and consequence while participation and provision continue?
53

## Page 54

Now I a fourfold vision see
And a fourfold vision is given to me
Tis fourfold in my supreme delight
And three fold in soft Beulahs night
And twofold Always. May God us keep
From Single vision & Newtons sleep
Q12. William Blake, Letter to Thomas Butts, 22 November 1802, verse 83-88, E722. ( Blake, 1802).
The same letter gives the visionary sequence a troublesome particular:
What to others a trifle appears
Fills me full of smiles or tears
For double the vision my Eyes do see
And a double vision is always with me
With my inward Eye 'tis an old Man grey
With my outward a Thistle across my way
Q28. William Blake, Letter to Thomas Butts, 22 November 1802, verse 25–30, E721. ( Blake, 1802).
The outward object remains a thistle while the inward account encounters an old man. Vision adds an address and an affective
claim to something others dismiss as trivial. The letter’s commercial and domestic setting matters: Blake asks about a remaining
canvas and drawings ordered by Butts, while the verse stages competing obligations to patrons, friends, wife and sister. Its
visionary enlargement occurs within work and dependency [ Blake (1802), opening prose, E720; verse 31–68, E721–722].
Yet recognition does not guarantee care. The speaker kicks the thistle from its root, and later names the old man weltering on
his path. The account moves toward the fourfold declaration through wrath, threatened poverty, familial strain and heavens
dropping human blood. Reading only the final six lines would conceal how uncertain the relation between expanded perception
and changed conduct remains ( Blake, 1802, verse 41–82, E721–722).
The institutional comparison should therefore ask what an additional perspective enables its holder to do to someone else.
Hearing a worker’s dependency can support protection, but an official might instead incorporate it into a more effective scheme
of control. The same outward agreement can persist in either case. A useful study would record whether the changed description
alters a proposed consequence, gives the affected person a new power of challenge, or merely increases the administrator’s
interpretive reach. The vision does not earn public authority by being richer. It must become answerable through the decisions
and relationships it changes.
Fourfold vision guides attention to partial perspectives and their relations. In the institutional comparison, that means asking
what each account reveals, what it excludes and how its claims can be challenged. The prototype varies the number of
interpretive lenses while holding rights and safeguards fixed.
This distinction joins the textual and institutional arguments. The person passing through a state retains standing to challenge
the collective account of that state. Translation services, public reasons and effective review connect that standing to a
practicable power of response.
8.1 Shared evidence, reliable reports and the authority to act
Federated inference specifies how partial observers can learn through one another. Friston and colleagues model sentinels with
complementary views of a shared environment. Their communications carry beliefs and confidence through likelihood mappings;
combining them presupposes common latent states and an aligned frame of reference. The communication construction excludes
an agent’s own message and transmits predictions grounded in earlier observations [ Friston et al. (2024), sec. 3.1, Eqs. 6–8;
Figs. 3–5]. The task’s latent variables describe a shared environment; poetic-state interpretations retain their own type in
the present model. Translation therefore involves decisions about coordinates, categories, confidence and the independence of
reports. A common description acquires value through the perspectives it makes available.
The categorical framework in Robust Belief Sharing separates local robust updating from server aggregation. It distinguishes
a fixed-weight logarithmic pool, divergence-based heuristic reweighting, and a separate objective-backed variational aggregator.
Its zero-robustness identity returns the project’s log-linear pool. Under finite positive shared support, posterior-log-potential
representations and fixed weights, that pool specializes Friston and colleagues’ message-combination term; recovery of the
complete communication protocol is a different claim ( Friedman, 2026c, secs. 5.8–5.9, Theorem 5 and Corollary 6). Bounded
client losses, conditional contamination contrasts and descent of the server objective support different assertions about reliability.
This distinction directs the institutional comparison. A report’s evidential weight and its author’s standing belong to separate
records. Discounting a message need not remove its author’s provision, voice or access to review. A challenge may concern
an erroneous report within agreed categories, or the categories and jurisdiction through which the report was judged. The
decision record should identify the grounds for reweighting and a route for disputing those grounds. Shared understanding then
supports a decision whose issuer, warrant, reach and remedy remain answerable.
54

## Page 55

Figure 29: Two connected records follow a report and an affected person. The technical lane identifies shared coordinates,
confidence-bearing communication and aggregation; the institutional lane records standing, a warrant for the specified decision, affected
reach and effective challenge. The comparison draws on Friston et al. ’s communication construction and the categorical framework’s
separation of client, heuristic-server and objective-backed claims ( Friston et al. , 2024, sec. 3.1, Eqs. 6–8; Friedman, 2026c, secs. 5.8–5.9).
The institutional connections are this article’s construction: evidential weighting and standing remain separately represented.
55

## Page 56

9 Institutional revision through coherence, rupture and regeneration
Coherence–Rupture–Regeneration offers a vocabulary for examining accumulated practice, interruption and reconstruction
(Sabine, 2026a,b). In institutional terms, the question is what survives revision: care relationships, language services, entitle-
ments and unresolved claims may need continuity even when an abusive office is abolished.
Sabine’s letter derives a square-root-of-two optimum for a specified allocation problem ( Sabine, 2026a, sec. 6, PDF pp. 18–19);
the phase-gating author manuscript develops a toy simulation and identifies its regeneration kernel as untested ( Sabine, 2026b,
open author manuscript, sec. 6, PDF pp. 14–15). Here their use is comparative: stabilization can preserve an exclusion, inter-
ruption can reopen a decision, and reconstruction can either redistribute authority or restore its monopoly. The constitutional
assessment concerns rights, material security and the control of the revised institution.
Amendment, negotiation, redistribution and abolition are different forms of institutional revision. Each needs a trigger, an
authorized procedure, continuity arrangements and an account of who pays. A change of officeholders leaves capture intact
when it preserves the same unchecked power over dependent participants.
The decision record can follow a claim across this transition: who declares the interruption, which obligations continue, who
authorizes the replacement and how dissenters reopen it. Regeneration becomes a question about redistributed powers and
sustained relationships rather than a label that settles the outcome.
10 Research infrastructure and the contribution of the states–nations distinc-
tion
The reconstruction draws on earlier work connecting Blake, perception and methodological pluralism ( Friedman, 2026b,a). Its
distinct task is institutional: to specify the relation between poetic states, historical nations and accountable decisions. The
corpus tools supply passage provenance ( Friedman, 2026f), while the classification analysis supplies a method for following an
entity across different institutional roles ( Friedman, 2026d). Models, executable evidence and justified ends retain separate
functions ( Friedman, 2026e).
10.1 Shared retrieval and accountable reading decisions
The public Blake repository now supplies the reusable passage schemas, copied-source custody, regex concordance, literal word-
window search, descriptive statistics and offline search engine. This application retains the political questions, explicit variants,
selected proximity pairs, institutional models and the argument. A parallel invertebrate application uses the same evidence
and review infrastructure while retaining its own animal vocabulary and contextual categories. Their shared software makes
the procedure inspectable; neither application’s conclusions become properties of the corpus.
The matching contracts remain distinct. The historical Federalism concordance and descriptive statistics retain regex whole-
word matching, while literal proximity preserves exact punctuation and whitespace. A normalized category study can instead
join tokens across punctuation. Original spans and named profiles expose these choices rather than hiding them under one
search label. Recomputing the retained Federalism experiments through the shared implementation preserves their concordance,
statistics, literal-study and proximity measurements. Current source bindings identify the new producer separately from those
historical analytical results.
The application also provides an authored evidence-review queue. Its immutable columns retain the candidate’s passage, ex-
pression, source role and locator; separate decision fields identify a reviewer, rationale and verification locator. Textual support,
counterreading, nonpolitical use and uncertainty are declared reading decisions. An omitted decision remains unreviewed. A
pinned historical queue can receive a later review whose receipt names both producers. These controls improve the traceability
of selection and disagreement. They do not make a reading binding on another person or supply the standing, protection and
remedial powers required of institutional review.
Version comparisons, related projects and proposed textual corrections are documented in the portfolio crosswalk. The article
uses those materials as research context and develops its claims through the primary passages and political interlocutors
examined here.
11 Corpus statistics: work balance, copy sensitivity and term relationships
11.1 Source families, tokenization and the unit of comparison
The copied corpus contains 2,067 source units: 540 reading extracts, 731 XML units and 796 retained Erdman pages. The
primary-reading analysis uses 199 extracts containing 644,245 Unicode word tokens. Their 33 recorded work IDs serve as
source-family groups. These groups preserve the archive’s organization: some collect copies of a poem, while bb134 collects 39
receipt extracts. The complete inventory retains work, edition, copy, role and input hash.
56

## Page 57

Figure 30: Stored source units by plane and role. All three bars share one zero-based count scale; primary, editorial and unverified
segments retain their exact counts, including zero categories and the four-unit editorial XML segment. The lower totals reconcile the
roles with all 2,067 imported units. Copies, pages and XML records retain their recorded identities; the figure counts stored units rather
than unique works.
The twenty fixed query groups include one zero-hit control. Variants are literal, case-insensitive whole words. The persons
group searches individual, individuals, identity and identities; nations searches nation, nations, people and peoples. Every
occurrence retains its original offsets and source identity in the private concordance. The aggregate analysis keeps counts,
token denominators and grouping identities.
The census in fig. 30 separates primary, editorial and unverified material before any thematic comparison. Every one of the
twenty new primary occurrence/matched-unit totals agrees with the preserved concordance. The new statistical report has its
own producer and input fingerprint.
Definition 10 (Coverage and token-normalized retrieval). For primary units 𝑈 , let 𝑡𝑢 count Unicode word tokens, 𝑐𝑢𝑞
count occurrences of the declared variants of query 𝑞, and ℎ𝑢𝑞 = 1 exactly when 𝑐𝑢𝑞 > 0. For a subset 𝑉 ⊆ 𝑈 ,
𝐶𝑞(𝑉 ) =
∑𝑢∈𝑉 ℎ𝑢𝑞
|𝑉 | , 𝑅 𝑞(𝑉 ) = 10 4 ∑𝑢∈𝑉 𝑐𝑢𝑞
∑𝑢∈𝑉 𝑡𝑢
. (11)
Coverage is undefined for an empty subset; rate is undefined for a zero token denominator. A populated denominator with no
matches gives zero. Whole-word phrase variants contribute one occurrence while their constituent words remain tokens in the
denominator.
57

## Page 58

11.2 Copy repetition and family balance change different results
Exact-text deduplication removes one repeated America copy-n extraction: 199 units become 198 and 644,245 tokens become
641,304. The states query changes from 264 to 263 occurrences, while its rate moves from 4.09782 to 4.10102 per 10,000 tokens.
Exact duplication contributes little to that rate. Different copies and unequal family lengths are the more consequential design
choices.
Equal-family weighting changes the state rate to 3.48624 per 10,000 tokens (fig. 31). The method gives each positive-token
source family the same weight, rather than weighting it by the amount of retained text. It can increase as well as decrease a
rate: imagination rises from 2.03339 pooled to 4.35097 equal-family, and exchange/interchange rises from 0.10865 to 0.20482.
The two estimates answer different questions about the same collection.
Definition 11 (Equal-family rates and finite deletion sensitivity). Let 𝑊 be the recorded family IDs, 𝑈𝑤 = {𝑢 ∈ 𝑈 ∶
family(𝑢) = 𝑤} , and 𝑊+ = {𝑤 ∈ 𝑊 ∶ ∑ 𝑢∈𝑈𝑤
𝑡𝑢 > 0}. Define
𝑅𝑞 = 1
|𝑊+| ∑
𝑤∈𝑊+
𝑅𝑞(𝑈𝑤), 𝒟 𝑞 = (𝑅 𝑞(𝑈 ∖ 𝑈 𝑤))𝑤∈𝑊 . (12)
The equal-family mean weights each eligible family once. The minimum and maximum of defined values in 𝒟𝑞 describe the
full leave-one-family-out range for this collection. This indexed family retains the omitted family ID when values tie. Each
omission removes both its occurrences and its tokens.
Jerusalem supplies the largest state count of three central prophetic families: 101 occurrences across five copies, against Milton’s
64 across four and Urizen’s 49 across seven. Their normalized rates reverse that ordering: Urizen 22.42460, Milton 8.42260 and
Jerusalem 5.11237 per 10,000 tokens. The textual focus on Milton and Jerusalem follows their explicit state/person distinctions;
raw frequency alone would select a different center of attention.
Deleting one family places the pooled state rate between 3.45440 and 4.42767. Omitting Urizen yields the lower endpoint;
omitting Songs of Innocence and of Experience yields the upper. The change identifies a concrete comparison for close reading:
Urizen’s concentration of state language against the explicit distinctions in Milton, rather than further copies of Jerusalem
alone.
Concentration is sharper for other vocabularies. Jerusalem supplies 380 of 418 emanation occurrences and 76 of 88 partic-
ular/particulars occurrences. Removing it changes their pooled rates from 6.48821 to 0.85071 and from 1.36594 to 0.26865.
The diagrams in fig. 32 identify this dependence directly. Repeatedly retrieving these terms in Jerusalem can deepen an
interpretation of that poem; comparison across families requires actively seeking the smaller supporting sets.
The opening word-count table begins with the numerator and denominator: 264 matches for state or states among 644,245
counted words give 4.10 matches per 10,000 words. The all-words calculation combines every match and word. Equal-family
weighting first calculates the frequency inside each recorded family and averages those frequencies, retaining families with no
matches. The distinction has a visible consequence: particular and particulars change from 1.366 to 0.194 per 10,000, while
imagination changes from 2.033 to 4.351. The retained Laocoön family has eight imagination matches in 1,212 words, and The
Ghost of Abel has eight in 1,438; their frequencies are 66.01 and 55.63 per 10,000. These short families receive the same weight
as Jerusalem under the family average. Jerusalem supplies the most matches in all eight groups, but omitting a family changes
both matches and words, so its deletion need not produce the lowest remaining frequency. Counts, source length and family
weighting answer different questions.
11.3 Repetition, bodily constraint and the making of eternal law
Urizen has the highest state rate among the three prophetic source families compared above, but its 49 matches have one
repeated form. Each of the seven retained primary copies contains seven occurrences of the refrain “a state of dismal woe” ;
every state-query match in those copies falls within that phrase. The seven copies are byte-distinct, so exact-text deduplication
leaves this repetition intact. The source-bound context audit identifies all seven inputs and their text hashes. This is a different
dependence from an accidentally duplicated file.
In the ASU transcription, the refrain closes successive ages in the production of Urizen’s body: spine and ribs, heart, eyes,
ears, nostrils, throat and tongue, then limbs. Los’s labor constructs a bounded sensorium through chains, rivets and furnaces;
he eventually shrinks from the task ( Blake, n.d.f, 10:25–44, 11:1–27, 13:1–23, E75–77). The repeated condition carries the
sequence’s affective force. Its seven occurrences do not perform the same argumentative work as Milton’s explicit distinction
between individuals and states. A lexical comparison becomes stronger when it identifies that difference.
The law speech supplies the adjacent political problem. Urizen’s book does not announce itself through cruelty alone:
58

## Page 59

Figure 31: The corpus contribution of a word depends on its sources. Three summaries separate weighting from exact-text repetition.
Red filled circles give pooled rates retaining all stored primary units; black squares give equal means over positive-token source families,
joined on the same per-10,000-token axis. The separate column gives exact-text rates and occurrences after one representative is
retained per identical text. Pooled denominators are 199 units and 644,245 tokens; exact-text denominators are 198 units and 641,304
tokens. Query groups retain their declared variants, including individual/identity for persons, people/peoples for nations and freedom
for liberty.
59

## Page 60

Figure 32: Which source family carries the conclusion? Every defined single-family deletion appears as a grey rug mark after that
family’s hits and tokens are removed; the red marker retains the complete primary collection. Numeric endpoints name omitted families
and retain ties. The concentration column identifies the largest contributing family and its occurrences over the query total, alongside
the share. The marks describe sensitivity within the recorded collection; the grey range is the extent of these deletions.
60

## Page 61

8. Laws of peace, of love, of unity:
Of pity, compassion, forgiveness.
Let each chuse one habitation:
His ancient infinite mansion:
One command, one joy one desire,
One curse, one weight, one measure
One King, one God, one Law.
Q21. William Blake, The [First] Book of Urizen 4:34–40, E72. ( Blake, n.d.f).
Peace, love, pity and forgiveness culminate in one command and one measure. The objection is therefore directed at a form of
imposed unity that can claim humane ends. The speech follows solitary writing in books of metal and receives the Eternals’
rage in response (4:24–50, E72). In the proposed federation, common provision needs binding rules, but its beneficial purpose
cannot by itself authorize one institution to settle every participant’s desires, attachments and interpretation of the whole.
Near the poem’s end, children who mourn and build tombs make a further transformation:
And form'd laws of prudence, and call'd them
The eternal laws of God
Q22. William Blake, The [First] Book of Urizen 28:6–7, E83. ( Blake, n.d.f).
The verbs separate making a rule from calling it eternal. Historical experience and prudence matter, yet the divine designation
is itself an act within the history being narrated. A federation must preserve the reasons for an inherited arrangement while
keeping its authority open to challenge. This sharpens the states–nations distinction: recognizing an enduring imaginative
possibility differs from making an enduring claim on other people. The institutional record accordingly separates a classification,
its asserted warrant and the consequences officials seek to impose.
11.4 Shared vocabulary identifies comparisons for close reading
The analysis computes pairwise overlap in three universes: retained primary extracts, exact-text-distinct extracts and source-
family presence. The last counts a family once regardless of its number of copies. The complete result contains 570 association
records, 190 query pairs in each universe.
Definition 12 (Overlap, conditional presence and lift). In a declared universe of 𝑛 units, let 𝑋𝑞 and 𝑋𝑞′ be the presence
sets for two queries. Define
Jac(𝑞, 𝑞′) = |𝑋𝑞 ∩ 𝑋𝑞′|
|𝑋𝑞 ∪ 𝑋𝑞′| , Pr(𝑞′ ∣ 𝑞) = |𝑋𝑞 ∩ 𝑋𝑞′|
|𝑋𝑞| , Lift(𝑞, 𝑞′) = 𝑛|𝑋𝑞 ∩ 𝑋𝑞′|
|𝑋𝑞||𝑋𝑞′| . (13)
Each expression is undefined when its denominator is zero. The universe and presence sets travel with every reported value.
Presence in one full extraction records shared textual coverage, including distant or opposed passages.
Nations and states share nine of seventeen source families in their union: Jaccard 0.52941 and lift 1.75740. Persons and
states share three of fourteen: Jaccard 0.21429 and lift 1.90385. The latter has narrower shared coverage but larger relative
concentration because the person/identity vocabulary occurs in only four families. Liberty/freedom and nation/people share
four families; four of the five liberty-bearing families contain the national vocabulary, while only four of thirteen nation-bearing
families contain liberty. Conditional presence makes that asymmetry visible.
The computational contribution is a ranked set of comparisons with inspectable denominators: Urizen for state density;
non-Jerusalem families for particulars and emanation; and the four person/identity-bearing families for testing the proposed
state/person relation. The manuscript’s quoted passages then supply speech, sequence, image and argumentative context. The
retrieval and the reading perform connected tasks.
11.5 Corpus-wide retrieval follows an argument back to its source units
The fixed query groups support a stable comparison across versions. The new search engine also accepts ad hoc words and
exact phrases across all 2,067 imported units. Its default selection is primary text; role, source plane and recorded work ID can
be selected independently. An alternative query accepts any of its terms. A conjunctive query requires every term within the
same stored source unit. The latter identifies a shared document context; a reading extract may encompass a whole poem, so
conjunction does not imply a shared sentence or dramatic speaker.
Search preserves the source spelling and punctuation. Unicode casefolding supports case-insensitive matching, with each folded
character mapped back to its original text offset. A match must align with complete source characters. Literal phrases retain
their spaces and line breaks; the interface offers substring matching separately from whole-word boundaries. Search results
include the edition, locator, source URL, role, rights statement, original-text hash and exact span. These fields let a reader
reopen a passage and distinguish the text being interpreted from the layers through which it was retrieved.
61

## Page 62

Figure 33: Shared families are invitations to read, not evidence of shared meaning. All 64 Jaccard comparisons for eight query groups
across 33 recorded source families, with marginal family fractions beside the rows and a common 0–1 grey key. Each cell divides shared
families by families containing either query. The lower readouts give shared family IDs and distinguish symmetric overlap from
directional conditional presence. Liberty and particulars share 3 of 5 union families; all 3 particulars families contain liberty, giving
reverse conditional presence 1.00. Lift 6.60 uses the same 33-family marginal baseline. These sets direct close reading to shared sources,
including distant or opposed passages.
62

## Page 63

Figure 34: Literal search separates primary, editorial and unverified roles on one zero-based occurrence scale. Every cell reports all
term matches, matched units and distinct matching family IDs; headers retain eligible unit and family denominators. The primary
column contains reading extracts; editorial includes mixed Erdman pages and four XML units. Seven saved queries include a zero-result
nonsense control. Phrase searches preserve literal whitespace, and all counts precede display limits while stored copies retain their
source identities.
Definition 13 (Search counts precede the displayed sample). For a nonempty set 𝑄 of casefold-distinct literal terms
and eligible source-unit set 𝑈 , let 𝐻𝑞(𝑢) be the nonoverlapping, character-aligned literal matches for query term 𝑞 in unit 𝑢. An
alternative query admits units with any nonempty 𝐻𝑞(𝑢); a conjunctive query admits units for which every 𝐻𝑞(𝑢) is nonempty.
Write the admitted units as 𝑀 . The occurrence count and matched-unit count are
𝑂 = ∑
𝑢∈𝑀
∑
𝑞∈𝑄
|𝐻𝑞(𝑢)|, 𝐵 match = |𝑀 |. (14)
The result limit selects the first 𝐿 records from the deterministic ordering of term-labeled matches. It does not change 𝑂,
𝐵match, the source-family facets or their eligible token denominators. Different overlapping query terms retain separate match
records.
The literal-search study in fig. 34 compares six deliberately narrow searches across the source layers and retains a seventh
nonsense query. Separating liberty from freedom makes the lexical choice inspectable; searching minute particulars and general
forms as literal phrases distinguishes those formulations from the broader particulars query. The figure reports exact counts and
matched units in each role. An editorial occurrence may identify commentary worth consulting, but its source label prevents
it from being counted as another primary Blake utterance.
63

## Page 64

Within the primary extracts, liberty occurs 55 times in 17 units, while freedom occurs six times in six units. Minute particulars
has 21 matches and general forms five; both phrase searches match four units in the recorded Jerusalem family. The interface
exposes their constituent texts so that four retained witnesses do not become four independent works. Keeping liberty and
freedom separate also makes an interpretive choice visible before combining them into a broader lexical group.
The local search workspace connects these counts to passage cards, highlighted spans and a source-family distribution. Its
role/plane matrix and family table use the full matched set before the display cap; the exported result records the same request
and pin. This makes a specific comparison possible: select a lexical cluster, inspect where its occurrences concentrate, then
read the passages that supply the concentration. A frequency table can direct the next comparison without deciding which
speaker, national formation or institutional claim deserves endorsement.
11.6 Word windows distinguish nearby language from document-wide co-presence
The optional word window narrows conjunctive retrieval to a stated span of the original text. Every term must participate in
at least one complete qualifying combination. A distant occurrence of a term is not retained merely because another occurrence
of that term qualifies elsewhere in the document. The reported occurrence total counts each participating term-labeled span
once, even when it belongs to several qualifying combinations. This makes the window a retrieval constraint with inspectable
counts, rather than a distance attached only to the first displayed result.
Definition 14 (Complete word windows and participating occurrences). Let 𝒯𝑢 be the intervals of the original text’s
Unicode word tokens, using the implementation’s \w+ rule, and define 𝜈𝑢(𝑎, 𝑧) = |{[𝑠, 𝑒) ∈ 𝒯 𝑢 ∶ 𝑠 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑒 > 𝑎}| . For ALL
search with |𝑄| ≥ 2 and integer budget 1 ≤ 𝑏 ≤ 200 , a complete tuple selects one hit 𝜂𝑞 = [𝑠 𝜂𝑞
, 𝑒𝜂𝑞
) per term:
Ω𝑏(𝑢) = {(𝜂 𝑞)𝑞∈𝑄 ∈ ∏
𝑞∈𝑄
𝐻𝑞(𝑢) ∶ 𝜈 𝑢(min
𝑞∈𝑄
𝑠𝜂𝑞
, max
𝑞∈𝑄
𝑒𝜂𝑞
) ≤ 𝑏} ,
𝐻 𝑏
𝑞 (𝑢) = {𝜂 𝑞 ∶ (𝜂 𝑞′ )𝑞′∈𝑄 ∈ Ω 𝑏(𝑢)}.
(15)
Use 𝐻 𝑏
𝑞 (𝑢) in eq. 14 and admit exactly the units with nonempty Ω𝑏(𝑢). Phrase tokens count toward the envelope; punctuation-
only envelopes contain zero word tokens. Different terms may overlap. Without a budget, ALL retains its document-wide
meaning. The window changes the admitted matches, while the display cap still leaves their totals and facets unchanged.
The implementation sweeps feasible word-window positions instead of enumerating every complete tuple. Every occurrence
contributes an interval of possible window origins; simultaneous coverage by all terms identifies qualifying positions, and
interval intersection identifies the participating hits. Independent Cartesian enumeration on short inputs checks the result
directly. Increasing the budget can add participating occurrences and source units, and cannot remove them. The retained
source and locator let the next reading identify speaker, endorsement and conceptual relation.
The six-pair comparison applies budgets of 8, 16, 32 and 64 word tokens, followed by document-wide ALL, to the same 199
primary units, 33 recorded families and 644,245 tokens. State with individual matches no units at 8 or 16 words, four at 32,
six at 64 and nine document-wide. States with individuals matches six units at every width. This singular/plural difference
makes the literal query choice visible before a broader conceptual group combines variants. It directs reading toward particular
formulations and witnesses rather than ranking an abstract state/person relation by its aggregate frequency.
System with imagination occurs in thirteen shared units document-wide and none within 64 words. The result directs attention
to how the larger dramatic scene relates the two terms. Los’s declaration instead places system beside create and enslavement
(Q30), while the next plate joins systems to deliverance (Q31). The search pairs therefore supply alternative routes into the
argument: one asks where the selected words appear together, another asks which nearby actions and objects make that relation
intelligible. Labour with misery grows from zero matched units at 8 words to four at 16 and nine document-wide, directing a
separate comparison of work, exhaustion and the wider passages already read beside the plates.
11.7 Reading, quotation and image method
The research record retains three index snapshots: 223 catalog works and 202 text files in the original scope; 224/203 in the
addendum; 226/205 in the captured 23 October index. Its explicit Blake program identifies 21 entries, nine core and twelve
related. Prior reports record complete extracted-text reading for nine core works and three short related works, and selected
contexts for nine longer related works. The cumulative scholarship ledger records subsequent readings by source, version and
span.
Forty displayed Blake quotations in this version are bound to named Arizona State University (ASU) HTML anchors, occur-
rence indices and normalized text, with complete input-byte hashes. Normalization collapses whitespace and excludes small
editorial locator and footnote markers; Markdown line-break, escaped-hyphen and escaped-apostrophe syntax is removed before
comparison. Spelling and punctuation remain. Plate 52 has an explicit right-epigraph reading order. Q11 declares two non-
contiguous excerpts. A changed line, missing input or unrecorded blockquote stops rendering. The ledger verifies this selection
against the captured transcription.
64

## Page 65

Figure 35: How local is a verbal conjunction? Complete literal combinations at 8, 16, 32 and 64 original-word budgets, followed by
whole-unit ALL. Each cell reports matched units | matched families, with participating term-labeled occurrences in parentheses; an
outline marks the first nonzero scope. The six pairs retain singular/plural choices. Every cell shares 199 eligible units, 33 families and
644,245 tokens. A zero records no qualifying match under that query. The occurrence count counts participating term matches;
whole-unit presence can join distant passages. Counts precede the display cap.
65

## Page 66

Figure 36: Jerusalem 91, copy I. Q18 selects Los’s criticism of aggregate Moral Law in lines 26–31, while the Spectre and anvil remain
visible below. The full sheet places particulars and aggregation within an ongoing scene of work and confrontation, giving the corpus
figures a specific passage to return to. LOC, Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103; posthumous impression, approximately 1832?.
Fourteen official Library of Congress reproductions accompany the argument. Milton is copy D, leaf numbered 35, catalogued
1804 [i.e. 1815?], with paper watermarked 1815. Its passage corresponds to M32; scan 32 is a different page. Jerusalem is copy
I, catalogued 1804 [i.e. 1832?], with 1831/1832 watermarks. The selected Jerusalem sheets are posthumous impressions, not
evidence of Blake personally printing them. The item-specific no-known-restrictions advisory is retained, not relabeled CC0 or
applied to the entire recovered corpus. Modern editorial apparatus is not reproduced as Blake’s text.
The fourteen uncropped provider images appear beside the readings they inform and are scaled proportionally. Their critical
purposes concern text and ornament, the opposing epigraphs around To the Deists, the diagram naming Reason, Pity, Wrath,
Desire and This World, and Los’s anvil amid labor, weapons and provision. Typeset quotations make the argument accessible
without requiring miniature engraved lettering to carry it. Source and rights notes explain the choice of these identified historical
images.
The selected copy-D leaf places as multitudes marginally beside the human-form passage. The selected J73 sheet reads howl
in the spectres passage. These support specific local comparisons without repairing the retained recovered transcription or
settling every variant. The old discrepancy docket remains historical; a new collation note records these limited observations.
ASU’s edition and the Library of Congress (LOC) impressions are different source objects, and agreement on selected passages
does not make them one edition.
11.8 An aggregate keeps its vitality in the particulars
You accumulate Particulars, & murder by analyzing, that you
May take the aggregate; & you call the aggregate Moral Law:
And you call that Swelld & bloated Form; a Minute Particular.
But General Forms have their vitality in Particulars: & every
Particular is a Man; a Divine Member of the Divine Jesus.
So Los cried at his Anvil in the horrible darkness weeping!
Q18. William Blake, Jerusalem 91:26–31, E251. ( Blake, n.d.b).
Los distinguishes an organized whole from the destruction of particulars in the name of moral law. He speaks at the anvil in
darkness; the following exchange exposes his own resort to coercion. The speech supplies an internal test of the interpreter and
modeler: retaining individual rows is insufficient if the aggregate removes their capacity to answer. The statistical analyses
retain work and copy labels, while the institutional experiments preserve affected people and obligations. These are concrete
design choices for keeping a summary connected to what it summarizes.
66

## Page 67

11.9 Production, design and interpretive authority
Composition without capture must constrain the scholar who reconstructs it. An interpretation can give every person several
affiliations yet reserve to its author the power to decide what those affiliations ultimately mean. Its generosity then depends
on a monopoly over the common description. The question is whether a participant can contest the account of humanity
through which inclusion is offered while continuing to share institutions, resources and obligations. A defensible reconstruction
must allow disagreement with its poetic vocabulary to count as political argument. Otherwise, passage between states remains
available only within a world whose interpretive boundaries someone else has fixed.
Viscomi supplies a methodological restraint on this authority. His account of the workshop makes production part of meaning
and resists both excusing execution in the name of vision and decoding every mark as a symbol. Decoration can organize
attention while also serving the practical requirements of etching and inking ( Viscomi, 1982, author reprint web pp. 3–8,
compilation PDF pp. 60–65). The implication here is that neither an attractive political reading nor an exact transcription
exhausts an illuminated page. A claim about reciprocity needs an account of dramatic speech and visual relations; a claim
about a particular mark needs alternatives that include medium and execution. Interpretation becomes more answerable when
it identifies what could defeat it.
Essick and Viscomi make the material disagreement specific. Their inquiry distinguishes monochrome, hand-colored and color-
printed impressions and argues against a general two-pull account. They interpret the exceptional second printing of Nurses
Song in copy E as repair ( Essick and Viscomi , 2002, pp. 74–77, 98–102). The physical history assigned to a feature changes
what an interpretation can infer from it. Their technical conclusion is an attributed argument; the selected opening and ending
supply this comparison, rather than an independent resolution of the controversy.
Ritchie’s account of the Blake–Stedman engravings makes reproduction part of the interpretive problem. Her discussion of
contemporary reworkings ends by questioning the authority carried forward when historical images circulate, even under a
critical or emancipatory description ( Ritchie, 2025, paras. 26–30). Her objects have a different history from the Jerusalem
sheets shown here; the methodological demand concerns how an image is made to support a claim. The captions in this
article identify copy and sheet, describe a visible feature, locate the selected passage and name the critical purpose. Original
diagrams sit alongside those impressions as the article’s constructions. A plate can complicate an argument without certifying
its institutional conclusion.
The figures work at three levels. A transcription supplies the selected wording, an identified impression makes a material page
available for criticism, and an analytical diagram displays a proposed or measured relation. Captions identify the object, the
evidence it carries and the question it addresses. Copy sensitivity therefore exceeds duplicated words. Deduplication cannot
decide which material differences matter; equal-family weighting cannot supply a comparison of pages. Each calculation can
expose a choice that further reading and inspection must examine.
11.10 When would computation add something?
A typed relational graph can separate persons, affiliations, interpretations and competencies. Multiplex relations can coexist
without transferring authority across their layers. A model can expose a missing warrant or prohibited identification, but
cannot create a political right by drawing an edge. A richer implementation should begin with a decision, rival account and
independently justified norm before a compositional or active-inference formalism. A federated extension can hold the dispute
and safeguards fixed while varying communication access, misleading reports and the ability to challenge a classification. It
should record inference quality and practical contestability separately. The technical sources specify shared representations,
message construction and aggregation checks; the institutional record specifies who may impose the consequence and how an
affected person can obtain revision ( Friston et al. , 2024, secs. 3.1–3.2; Friedman, 2026c, secs. 5.8–5.9, 7.5).
An ablation is especially important. Remove poetic-state descriptors while holding safeguards and material circumstances
fixed. If the useful distinctions remain, institutional novelty belongs to political comparators, while Blake supplies critical or
interpretive value. If imaginative description makes a difference, identify how: whose reasons become audible, what assumption
changes and whether this is possible without compelled metaphysical assent. Current invariance under lens count is one small
software control, not that entire empirical comparison.
12 Competing explanations and the next comparative tests
Three comparisons drive the next stage. First, collate the state/person passages across identified copies, extending the Urizen
refrain audit to the other concentrated query results. Second, compare minimum safeguard bundles with the appointments,
funding, interim duties and remedies of existing forums. Third, compare readings of a dispute with and without the poetic-state
vocabulary while keeping rights and material circumstances fixed.
The final comparison tests whether Blake changes what participants hear, challenge or revise. Independently defended political
principles may account for all institutional improvements; the poetic reconstruction may instead reveal an excluded voice, a
possessive account of membership or an assumption about the common good. Record the changed claim and who can contest
it. The relevant outcome is a more answerable decision and a clearer relation among its participants.
67

## Page 68

13 Reading boundaries and image rights
The native bibliography records bibliographic identity. This ledger records what was actually read; citation does not imply
complete reading, verification of every cited authority, or endorsement. PDF locators below are one-based and retain their
particular edition. Historical reading reports remain separate from the new pass.
Source Actual reading boundary
(Blake, n.d.e); ( Blake, n.d.b); ( Blake, n.d.d); ( Blake, 1802);
(Blake, n.d.f); ( Blake, n.d.a)
Forty selected quotation records and immediate contexts,
with electronic anchor/hash controls. No whole-copy critical
edition or whole-oeuvre claim.
(Fallon, 2015) Complete twelve-page submitted manuscript and notes.
Published pagination not collated.
(Damrosch, 1980) Selected printed pp.15–21 / PDF pp. 30–36; printed p. 18 =
PDF p. 33.
(Larrissy, 1994) Publisher summary and metadata; chapter unread.
(Lee, 2026) Complete available ten-page introduction excerpt; not
complete introduction or book.
(Matthews, 2011) A vailable pp.1–10 and selected frontmatter; underlying cited
critics not read.
(Clark, 2006) Continuous publisher preview pp.167–168; p.171 and full
chapter remain unread.
(Nicolaïdis, 2013) Complete author-manuscript main argument pp.1–16; final
pp.351–369 not substituted as locators.
(Bauböck, 2001) Complete December 2001 main text, PDF pp. 2–34; no
current-law updating.
(Ostrom, 2010) Complete main text printed pp. 641–665 / PDF pp. 1–25; no
replication or reading all references.
(Hooghe and Marks , 2003) Complete main text printed pp. 233–241 / PDF pp. 1–9.
(Kymlicka, 1995; Shachar, 2001) Earlier bounded publisher materials; no full-book upgrade.
(Henderson, 2019) Complete article now read, printed pp. 17–41; p.42 is blank
running matter. Prior selected credit remains history.
(Simpson, 2014) Earlier publisher synopsis/contents; not an ethnography read.
(United Nations General Assembly , 2007) Complete preamble and 46 articles in official March 2008
printing; no current legal determination.
(Pettit, 2005) Complete working paper and notes, printed pp. 1–21 / PDF
pp. 3–23; not later publication collation.
(Pettit, 2012) All ten available introductory excerpt pages; not complete
introduction or book.
(Friedman, 2026d) Selected-context reading of §§2, 11–13 and captions, with
PDF text spot-checks; §§3–10 were not read completely.
Figure 13 was rechecked. The human decision schema is this
project’s extension.
(Rahman, 2025) Contributor profile pp.124–130; speculative proposal, not
report-wide authorship or validated effect.
(Sabine, 2026a,b) Prior selected passages; no full work/version collation,
mathematical validation or simulation execution.
(Friedman, 2026e) Earlier portfolio reading and version crosswalk; models,
evidence and justified ends remain separate.
(Makdisi, 1998) Complete available introduction excerpt pp. 1–10; later Blake
chapter and full book not read.
(Swiss Confederation , 2024) Selected constitutional provisions in the English
informational translation, text status 1 January 2024,
published within the 1 March 2024 parliamentary manual.
Printed pp. 1–3, 6, 8, 10–12, 20, 48–50, 52–54, 62.
68

## Page 69

13.1 Article readings
Source Actual new reading boundary
(Simpson, 2007) Complete article and notes, printed pp. 67–80; not the 2014
book or current membership law.
(Mellor, 1982/1983) Complete article and notes, printed pp. 148–155; no
independent biography or image collation.
(Ostriker, 1982/1983) Complete article and notes, printed pp. 156–165; no transfer
of reading to cited psychoanalytic or literary authorities.
(Shachar, 2005) Complete article and footnotes, printed pp. 49–88; not the
2001 book or current law/implementation evidence.
13.2 Portfolio version discipline
The citations to earlier work retain the earlier reported complete-extraction reading and the exact index/version crosswalk.
They do not certify a fresh complete reading, every image or secondary authority. The newer Mapping working paper is a
separately checked publication identity; its DOI does not relabel the older mirror as newly read. Printed-cover discrepancies
for Before Pragmatism and Agent and Niche remain in the retained ledger.
13.3 Image rights and critical use
The historical Library of Congress impressions carry item-attached no-known-U.S.-restrictions advisories, qualified for other
jurisdictions and users’ own status determination; these are not CC0. Credit: Rare Book and Special Collections Division,
Lessing J. Rosenwald Collection. Sources: Milton copy D, leaf 35 ; Jerusalem copy I, plates 1, 12, 27, 52, 54, 55, 59, 61, 73, 91,
98, 99 and 100 , posthumous impressions. Complete copy/date credits accompany the atlas.
Uncropped JPEGs are scaled proportionally for criticism of text-image relations, not as collection substitutes. Other corpus
resources stay private and ignored. The graphical abstracts combine project-authored diagrams with these credited historical
reproductions. The embedded figure-font licenses accompany the source package and rendering inputs. Copyright Office
guidance.
13.4 Additional primary-author scholarship
Viscomi’s complete author reprint, Heppner’s article, Kaplan’s article, Fraser’s 1992 chapter and Tully’s 2006 chapter were
read in the identified versions. Viscomi supplies workshop and execution alternatives to symbolic decoding; Heppner supplies
an active woman-city reading; Kaplan disputes Mellor’s visual explanation while sustaining a critique of masculine authority.
Fraser connects collective opinion formation to decision power, and Tully puts recognition procedures themselves within revision.
The article cites the specific pages used ( Viscomi, 1982; Heppner, 1986; Kaplan, 1996; Fraser, 1992; Tully, 2006).
The original image bodies remain uncropped. Jerusalem 27 and 99 come from the same identified copy-I item as plates 52, 54
and 73. Their additional purposes are to examine reciprocal exchange within the religious address and to compare final union
with the distribution of agency. Captions identify the impressions; typeset quotations identify the ASU transcription. The
source catalogue supplies the item-attached rights advisory and credit for each sheet.
13.5 Further readings on invention, public art and release
Source Reading and locator
(Viscomi, 2012) Complete unpaginated HTML essay, works cited and notes
1–21. Sections and paragraph incipits identify the cited
passages.
(Heppner, 1983) Complete article and notes 1–38, printed pp. 44–60 / PDF
pp. 2–18. Journal facsimile inspected, rather than the
original watercolor.
(Matthews, 2010) Complete unpaginated official HTML article, notes 1–67 and
acknowledgements. Paragraph incipits and note numbers
identify the cited passages.
(Viscomi, 2022) Sections II–III read continuously, with surrounding contexts,
ending and selected notes. Other sections retain
selected-reading status.
69

## Page 70

Source Reading and locator
(Blake, 1801) Selected paragraph 3 and immediate context in the ASU
transcription, E718.
The source ledger retains retrieval failures, cache hashes and the exact versions used. New readings do not change the recorded
status of Wright, Clark or the Makdisi book beyond its available introduction.
13.6 Urizen context and refrain audit
The new primary reading covers plates 4, 10–13 and 28 in the ASU electronic transcription, E71–77 and E83, including the
seven repeated state-refrain locations. Quotations Q21–Q22 retain the source’s spelling and punctuation. The separate copied-
corpus audit checks all 49 states matches in seven retained primary Urizen inputs against the refrain; this is occurrence/context
verification, with source identities and hashes, rather than copy collation ( Blake, n.d.f).
13.7 Collective vision, national reception and material impressions
Study Actual reading boundary
(Herrstrom, 1981) Complete official article prose and integrated notes 1–19,
printed pp. 64–77; main prose ends p. 75.
(Ferber, 2000) Complete prose, notes 1–33 and discography, printed
pp. 82–89; score images pp. 90–94 excluded.
(Essick and Viscomi , 2002) Selected continuous printed pp. 74–77 and 98–102, with notes
in those ranges. Middle evidentiary sections and the opposing
book were not read.
Jerusalem contexts were read at 45:1–44, 53:1–29, 73:1–54 and 91:1–58 in the ASU transcription. Q23–Q24 bind the provision
and national-generation passages to that captured input. The access ledger retains unsuccessful Elliott publisher requests and
discovery excerpts separately; they supply no substantive citation or reading credit.
13.8 Labor, visionary scale and corpus-wide search
The new scholarly readings are Moyer’s complete numbered article prose (paragraphs 1–33), all 22 inline note blocks, captions
and works cited, and Mitchell’s complete seminar paper (§§ I–IV, PDF pp. 8–10) with the three diagrams on PDF p. 11.
Moyer’s two publisher illustrations were inspected. Mitchell’s later book and the works cited by either author receive no new
reading credit ( Moyer, 2014; Mitchell, 1975).
Selected ASU contexts include Jerusalem 16:1–69, 55:1–69, 59:1–55 and 67:1–62; Marriage 21–24; the Reynolds host text and
annotations at E641; and selected Last Judgment locator-label passages at E556–557 and E561. These are selected-context
readings. The Last Judgment page’s printed N76[b] locator has no matching HTML anchor. Its countertext is paraphrased
with the notebook/Erdman locator; Q25 uses Jerusalem 59’s actual line anchors. The cumulative ledger is research/scholarship-
reading-0.8.0.json; the bounded source ledger is research/scholarship-source-ledger-0.8.0.json.
Jerusalem 59 is the eleventh uncropped LOC reproduction. Its lower text places delight, hunger and labor within the same
designed sheet. The item-attached rights advisory, copy I identity and posthumous dating are retained from the same identified
LOC item 48038103. The literal-search study records all role/family counts separately from the fulltext workspace. Fulltext
search output remains local and ignored.
13.9 Revisable categories, forgiveness and the conduct of vision
The new reading is White’s complete official HTML article, printed pp. 108-125, including all 87 notes and the works cited.
His practical-science interpretation and appeal to immediate experience inform the classification discussion; the article’s cited
sources and comparisons with later physics receive no additional reading credit ( White, 2005).
Q26-Q29 select verified ASU lines from Jerusalem 74, 49 and 98 and the 22 November 1802 Butts letter. Contiguous contexts
include all J74 and J98, J48:20-64, J49:1-77 and J50:1-30, J13 with the opening J14, and the complete named Butts letter in
this electronic version. These readings distinguish revisions of a category from compulsory forgiveness and distinguish expanded
perception from changed conduct. The twelfth uncropped LOC sheet is Jerusalem 98, copy I, from the same identified item and
advisory as the earlier Jerusalem impressions. The cumulative ledger is research/scholarship-reading-0.9.0.json; the bounded
delta is research/scholarship-source-ledger-0.9.0.json.
70

## Page 71

13.10 Creating systems, artistic selection and the authority to revise
The new complete readings are Stefanis’s official Tate article, including all 53 notes, and Stephen Clark’s complete BQ review,
printed pp.68–70. The review receives review credit; Birenbaum’s book receives none. Selected rereadings cover White pp.116–
117 and Mellor pp.148–150 with the continuation at p.151. Jerusalem plates 7–12 supply the continuous primary context for
Q30–Q32. The three new quotations retain exact ASU anchors, spelling and punctuation, including Mans and Falshood. They
use the already verified Jerusalem source body; no plate rights or copy identity changes. Cumulative and delta ledgers are
research/scholarship-reading-0.10.0.json and research/scholarship-source-ledger-0.10.0.json. ( Stefanis, 2010; Clark, 1995)
13.11 Organized poetic differences, national arts and fiscal power
The 0.11.0 primary-text additions read Jerusalem 3’s prose address and selected ending contexts, J97–99. Q33–Q36 retain
seventeen exact source segments, extending the ledger to 36 quotation records and 148 segments. The ASU Jerusalem source
body is unchanged. The frontispiece and final plate use copy I’s identified 2003 scans 1 and 100, uncropped and in the provider’s
orientation. The cumulative scholarship ledger is research/scholarship-reading-0.11.0.json; its 47 reading entries preserve the
previous reading bounds. These primary-text additions add no complete-article reading credit. The research packet retains the
successful image/metadata responses and the later LOC access refusal.
13.12 Federated inference and robust aggregation: source versions and selected sections
Source Sections used in the comparison
(Friston et al. , 2024) Sections 3.1–3.2; selected passages in 4–5 and 7; equations
6–15 and figure captions 3–11. The communication
comparison uses section 3.1, equations 6–8.
(Friedman, 2026c) Version 1.1.0, physical PDF pp. 16–19 (printed pp. 15–18),
24, 35, 41, 45, 50 and 52–54; sections 5.7–5.9, 7.1, 7.5, 8.3–8.5
and 8.15. The recovery comparison uses Theorem 5 and
Corollary 6.
The source ledger records the journal’s January 2024 issue and December 2023 online date, and distinguishes the robust
framework’s version DOI from its concept DOI. Cached primary texts and metadata retain their SHA-256 bindings in the local
research record; the cumulative reading ledger is research/scholarship-reading-0.13.0.json.
13.13 Unequal rules, release and the authority of reproduction
Q37–Q40 add eight exact segments from the already pinned ASU Marriage, Jerusalem and America inputs. Selected continuous
primary contexts cover Marriage 17–20 and 22–24, Jerusalem 45:1–38 and America 5:7–8:15. The two Marriage episodes remain
distinct. The quotation ledger now contains forty records and 156 segments; their new wording and original spelling are checked
before rendering.
Source Actual reading boundary
(Frosch, 1979) Complete scholarly review text, printed pp. 40–48 / PDF
pp. 2–10. Mitchell’s book receives no new reading credit. The
present discussion uses pp. 44–46.
(Ritchie, 2025) All thirty numbered article paragraphs, textual notes, eight
illustration captions and works cited in the official publisher
HTML. PDF text checked for locators, especially paras.
26–30 on physical pp. 12–14. Artwork originals, photographs
and embedded video were not inspected.
The cumulative ledger is research/scholarship-reading-0.13.0.json. Its 51 entries preserve the previous 49 reading records and
add these two readings; metadata-only records retain their earlier status.
71

## Page 72

14 Plate sources and credits
14 uncropped LOC reproductions accompany the main-text readings. The item-attached advisory reports no known U.S.
restrictions; it is not a CC0 license. Each caption identifies the impression separately from the ASU transcription. Collection:
Library of Congress, Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Lessing J. Rosenwald Collection. Each entry retains its full
caption and item-rights link.
M32: selected impression. William Blake, Milton, copy D, leaf numbered 35 (text cited as M32), 1804 [i.e. 1815?]. Relief-
etched, hand-colored page. Library of Congress, Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Lessing J. Rosenwald Collection,
item 48031331. Item rights .
J52: selected impression. William Blake, Jerusalem, copy I, plate 52, To the Deists, posthumous impression, ca. 1832?
(title-page date 1804). Library of Congress, Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Lessing J. Rosenwald Collection, item
48038103; Rosenwald 1811. Item rights .
J54: selected impression. William Blake, Jerusalem, copy I, plate 54, posthumous impression, ca. 1832? (title-page date
1804). Library of Congress, Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Lessing J. Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103;
Rosenwald 1811. Item rights .
J73: selected impression. William Blake, Jerusalem, copy I, plate 73, posthumous impression, ca. 1832? (title-page date
1804). Library of Congress, Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Lessing J. Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103;
Rosenwald 1811. Item rights .
J27: selected impression. William Blake, Jerusalem, copy I, plate 27, posthumous impression, approximately 1832? Library
of Congress, Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Lessing J. Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103. Item rights .
J99: selected impression. William Blake, Jerusalem, copy I, plate 99, posthumous impression, approximately 1832? Library
of Congress, Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Lessing J. Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103. Item rights .
J55: selected impression. William Blake, Jerusalem, copy I, plate 55, posthumous impression, ca. 1832? (title-page date
1804). Library of Congress, Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Lessing J. Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103;
Rosenwald 1811. Item rights .
J91: selected impression. William Blake, Jerusalem, copy I, plate 91, posthumous impression, ca. 1832? (title-page date
1804). Library of Congress, Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Lessing J. Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103;
Rosenwald 1811. Item rights .
J12: selected impression. William Blake, Jerusalem, copy I, plate 12, posthumous impression, ca. 1832? (title-page date
1804). Library of Congress, Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Lessing J. Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103;
Rosenwald 1811. Item rights .
J61: selected impression. William Blake, Jerusalem, copy I, plate 61, posthumous impression, ca. 1832? (title-page date
1804). Library of Congress, Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Lessing J. Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103;
Rosenwald 1811. Item rights .
J59: selected impression. William Blake, Jerusalem, copy I, plate 59. Paired figures and wheel amid the daughters’ labor;
posthumous impression, ca. 1832? Library of Congress, Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Lessing J. Rosenwald
Collection, item 48038103; Rosenwald 1811. Item rights .
J98: selected impression. William Blake, Jerusalem, copy I, plate 98. Conversation and visionary production within the
closing sequence; posthumous impression, ca. 1832? Library of Congress, Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Lessing
J. Rosenwald Collection, item 48038103; Rosenwald 1811. Item rights .
J1: selected impression. William Blake, Jerusalem, copy I, plate 1; posthumous impression, approximately 1832?; 2003
digitization. Frontispiece: clothed figure carrying a radiant lamp at an arch. Full provider image and orientation retained. Item
rights.
J100: selected impression. William Blake, Jerusalem, copy I, plate 100; posthumous impression, approximately 1832?; 2003
digitization. Final plate: three figures, celestial forms and implements; provider portrait scan retains figures sideways. Full
provider image and orientation retained. Item rights .
72

## Page 73

References
Rainer Bauböck. Territorial or Cultural Autonomy for National Minorities? Technical Report 22, Austrian Academy of Sciences,
Research Unit for Institutional Change and European Integration, December 2001. URL https://eif.univie.ac.at/downloads
/workingpapers/IWE-Papers/WP22.pdf. December revision, distinct from March Working Paper 15.
William Blake. Letter to John Flaxman, 19 October 1801, 1801. URL https://blake.lib.asu.edu/html/letters.html . ASU
electronic transcription, paragraph 3, E718; selected paragraph read.
William Blake. Letter to Thomas Butts, 22 November 1802. ASU-hosted electronic Erdman transcription, 1802. URL
https://blake.lib.asu.edu/html/Letters/23.htm.
William Blake. America a Prophecy. ASU-hosted electronic Erdman transcription, n.d.a. URL https://blake.lib.asu.edu/html
/america_a_prophecy.html. Plate, line and Erdman-page locators identify the quoted passages.
William Blake. Jerusalem. ASU-hosted electronic Erdman transcription, n.d.b. URL https://blake.lib.asu.edu/html/jerusal
em.html. Electronic Erdman transcription.
William Blake. A vision of the last judgment. ASU-hosted electronic Erdman transcription, n.d.c. URL https://blake.lib.as
u.edu/html/descriptions_of_last_judgment.html . Notebook p. 76, second passage, E556–557; the ASU printed locator is
VLJ-N76[b].
William Blake. The Marriage of Heaven and Hell. ASU-hosted electronic Erdman transcription, n.d.d. URL https://blake.lib.
asu.edu/html/marriage_of_heaven_and_hell.html.
William Blake. Milton. ASU-hosted electronic Erdman transcription, n.d.e. URL https://blake.lib.asu.edu/html/milton.html.
Plate, line and Erdman-page locators identify the selected passages.
William Blake. The [First] Book of Urizen. ASU-hosted electronic Erdman transcription, n.d.f. URL https://blake.lib.asu.
edu/html/book_of_urizen.html . Original work 1794; electronic transcription date unspecified. Selected locators use plates
and Erdman pages.
Stephen Clark. Harvey Birenbaum, Between Blake and Nietzsche: The Reality of Culture. Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly , 29
(2):68–70, 1995. URL https://bq.blakearchive.org/29.2.clark . Fall. Book review of Harvey Birenbaum’s 1992 monograph;
official HTML review read in full.
Steve Clark. Jerusalem as Imperial Prophecy. In Steve Clark and David Worrall, editors, Blake, Nation and Empire , pages
167–185. Palgrave Macmillan, 2006. doi: 10.1057/9780230597068_10. URL https://page-one.springer.com/pdf/preview/10.
1057/9780230597068_10.
Leopold Damrosch, Jr. Symbol and Truth in Blake’s Myth . Princeton University Press, 1980. URL https://api.pageplace.de/p
review/DT0400.9781400853731_A23704199/preview-9781400853731_A23704199.pdf.
Robert N. Essick and Joseph Viscomi. An inquiry into William Blake’s method of color printing. Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly,
35(3):74–103, 2002. URL https://bq.blakearchive.org/35.3.essick. Winter.
David Fallon. Homelands: Blake, Albion, and the French Revolution. In A. D. Cousins and Geoffrey Payne, editors, Home and
Nation in British Literature from the English to the French Revolutions , pages 202–218. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
doi: 10.1017/CBO9781107587571.014. URL https://sure.sunderland.ac.uk/id/eprint/6061/1/Homelands.pdf. Locators refer
to the twelve-page submitted manuscript.
Michael Ferber. Blake’s “Jerusalem” as a hymn. Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly , 34(3):82–94, 2000. URL https://bq.blakearch
ive.org/34.3.ferber. Issue designated Winter 2000/01. Prose, notes and discography occupy pages 82–89; scores occupy pages
90–94.
Nancy Fraser. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In Craig Calhoun,
editor, Habermas and the Public Sphere , Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought, pages 109–142. The MIT Press,
Cambridge, MA, 1992. ISBN 9780262031837. URL https://www.unm.edu/~sromano/english540/Fraser%2C%20Subalter
n%20Counterpublics.pdf. Chapter in the 1992 edited collection; locators use pages 109–142.
Daniel Ari Friedman. The Doors of Perception are the Threshold of Prediction: Active Inference and William Blake’s Theory
of Seeing. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18600041, 2026a. URL https://danielarifriedman.com/papers/2026_DoorsOfPer
ception/full_text.md.
Daniel Ari Friedman. Fourfold Vision: William Blake, Buckminster Fuller, and the Geometry of Omnirational Seeing. https:
//doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21388457, 2026b. URL https://danielarifriedman.com/papers/2026_FourfoldVision/full_text.md.
Daniel Ari Friedman. Robust Belief Sharing in Federated Active Inference: A Recovery-Tested Generalized-Variational Frame-
work for Categorical Contamination-Aware Consensus. Zenodo, September 2026c. URL https://zenodo.org/records/22149133.
73

## Page 74

Version 1.1.0. Published 19 September 2026. Version DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22149133; concept DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21864003.
Deposit catalogued as software. Selected manuscript sections read.
Daniel Ari Friedman. Entomological Law: A Field Map of Insects as Evidence, Threat, Property, Product, Patient, and Weapon.
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21137277, 2026d. URL https://danielarifriedman.com/papers/2026_EntomologicalLaw/ful
l_text.md. Version 1.0.0.
Daniel Ari Friedman. Active Inference as a Meta-Pragmatic Framework: Executable Models, Evidence, and the Discipline of
Revision. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23397453, 2026e. Version identity is recorded in the portfolio crosswalk.
Daniel Ari Friedman. Mapping William Blake’s Works: Evidence ledgers, source provenance, text-image diagnostics, and
rights-bounded release controls. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23601681, 2026f.
Karl J. Friston, Thomas Parr, Conor Heins, Axel Constant, Daniel Friedman, Takuya Isomura, Chris Fields, Tim Verbelen,
Maxwell Ramstead, John Clippinger, and Christopher D. Frith. Federated inference and belief sharing. Neuroscience and
Biobehavioral Reviews, 156:105500, January 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105500. URL https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.ni
h.gov/38056542/. Published online 5 December 2023. Selected full-text sections read.
Thomas Frosch. W. J. T. Mitchell, Blake’s Composite Art: A Study of the Illuminated Poetry. Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly ,
13(1):40–48, 1979. URL https://bq.blakearchive.org/13.1.frosch . Summer. Review of Mitchell’s 1978 book; locators use
printed pagination.
James [Sa’ke’j] Youngblood Henderson. UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Treaty Federalism in Canada.
Review of Constitutional Studies , 24(1):17–42, 2019. URL https://www.constitutionalstudies.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021
/02/02_Henderson-4.pdf.
Christopher Heppner. The Woman Taken in Adultery: An essay on Blake’s “Style of Designing” . Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly,
17(2):44–60, 1983. URL https://bq.blakearchive.org/17.2.heppner. Fall. Official article PDF has a generated cover followed
by printed pages 44–60.
Christopher Heppner. Blake’s “The New Jerusalem Descending”: A drawing (Butlin #92) identified. Blake/An Illustrated
Quarterly, 20(1):4–11, 1986. URL https://bq.blakearchive.org/20.1.heppner. Summer.
David Sten Herrstrom. Blake’s transformations of Ezekiel’s cherubim vision in Jerusalem. Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly , 15
(2):64–77, 1981. URL https://bq.blakearchive.org/15.2.herrstrom. Fall. Main prose ends on page 75; notes continue through
page 77.
Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks. Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-level Governance. American Political
Science Review , 97(2):233–243, 2003. doi: 10.1017/S0003055403000649. URL https://garymarks.web.unc.edu/wp-
content/uploads/sites/13018/2016/09/hooghe.marks_.unravelingcentralstate.apsr_.2003.pdf.
Marc Kaplan. Jerusalem and the origins of patriarchy. Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly , 30(3):68–82, 1996. URL https:
//bq.blakearchive.org/30.3.kaplan. Issue designated Winter 1996/1997.
Will Kymlicka. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights . Oxford University Press, 1995. doi: 10.1093/
0198290918.001.0001.
Edward Larrissy. Blake and Platonism. In Anna Baldwin and Sarah Hutton, editors, Platonism and the English Imagination ,
pages 186–198. Cambridge University Press, 1994. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511553806.018.
Tara Lee. William Blake and Romantic Biology: Evolution, Originality, and Organic Form . Cambridge University Press, 2026.
doi: 10.1017/9781009626422. URL https://assets.cambridge.org/97810096/26453/excerpt/9781009626453_excerpt.pdf.
Saree Makdisi. Romantic Imperialism: Universal Empire and the Culture of Modernity . Cambridge University Press, 1998. doi:
10.1017/CBO9780511549779. URL https://assets.cambridge.org/97805215/86047/excerpt/9780521586047_excerpt.pdf.
Susan Matthews. An alternative national gallery: Blake’s 1809 exhibition and the attack on evangelical culture. Tate Papers,
2010. ISSN 1753-9854. URL https://www.tate.org.uk/research/tate-papers/14/an-alternative-national-gallery-blakes-
1809-exhibition-and-the-attack-on-evangelical-culture . Issue 14. Autumn. Unpaginated article; paragraph incipits and note
numbers identify passages.
Susan Matthews. Blake, Sexuality and Bourgeois Politeness . Cambridge University Press, 2011. URL https://assets.cambrid
ge.org/97805215/13579/excerpt/9780521513579_excerpt.pdf.
Anne K. Mellor. Blake’s Portrayal of Women. Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly , 16(3):148–155, 1982/1983. URL https://bq.bla
kearchive.org/16.3.mellor. Winter 1982/1983.
W. J. T. Mitchell. Blake’s Visions of the Last Judgment: Some problems in interpretation. In Blake’s Visions of the Last
Judgment. Blake Newsletter, An Illustrated Quarterly, 1975. URL https://bq.blakearchive.org/pdfs/issues/9.2b.pdf . MLA
Blake Seminar discussion paper, 28 December 1975; PDF pp. 8–10; diagrams p. 11.
74

## Page 75

James F. Moyer. The Daughters Weave their Work in loud cries: Blake, slavery, and cotton. Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly ,
48(3), Winter 2014–15 2014. URL https://bq.blakearchive.org/48.3.moyer.
Kalypso Nicolaïdis. European Demoicracy and Its Crisis. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies , 51(2):351–369, 2013. doi:
10.1111/jcms.12006. URL https://kalypsonicolaidis.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Demoicracy-jcms-March-2013-1.pdf .
Passage locators use the online-first author manuscript pagination.
Alicia Ostriker. Desire Gratified and Ungratified: William Blake and Sexuality. Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly , 16(3):156–165,
1982/1983. URL https://bq.blakearchive.org/16.3.ostriker. Winter 1982/1983.
Elinor Ostrom. Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. American Economic
Review, 100(3):641–672, 2010. doi: 10.1257/aer.100.3.641. URL https://web.pdx.edu/~nwallace/EHP/OstromPolyGov.pdf.
Philip Pettit. Two-dimensional Democracy, National and International. Technical Report 2005/8, Institute for International
Law and Justice, New York University School of Law, 2005. URL https://www.iilj.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/Petit-
Two-Dimensional-Democracy-National-and-International-2005.pdf . Working paper version.
Philip Pettit. On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy . Cambridge University Press, 2012. ISBN
9781107005112. URL https://assets.cambridge.org/97811070/05112/excerpt/9781107005112_excerpt.pdf.
Shagor Rahman. Myth of Objectivity. In The Active Inference Institute and Active Inference Ecosystem , pages 124–130. Active
Inference Institute, 2025. URL https://danielarifriedman.com/papers/2025_AII_v3/full_text.md.
Caroline Anjali Ritchie. “Symbols of embodied agency”: The Reception of William Blake’s Engravings for John Gabriel
Stedman’s Narrative (1796) in Contemporary Art and Visual Culture. Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly , 58(3), January 2025.
doi: 10.47761/biq.374. URL https://blakequarterly.org/index.php/blake/article/view/ritchie583 . Winter 2024–25;
published 30 January 2025. Locators use numbered paragraphs.
Alexander Sabine. The Doors of Perception Are Mathematical: Coherence, Rupture, and Regeneration in Blake, Active
Inference, and Quantum Physics. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19388291, 2026a.
Alexander Sabine. Phase-Gating Across Precision Channels: Topological Constraints on Multi-channel Belief Update Dynamics.
In Artificial General Intelligence , volume 16855 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence , pages 219–236. Springer, 2026b.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-032-33195-3_17. The open author manuscript is identified separately in the text.
Ayelet Shachar. Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women ’s Rights . Cambridge University Press, 2001. doi:
10.1017/CBO9780511490330.
Ayelet Shachar. Religion, State, and the Problem of Gender: New Modes of Citizenship and Governance in Diverse Societies.
McGill Law Journal , 50(1):49–88, 2005. URL https://lawjournal.mcgill.ca/wp-content/uploads/pdf/410530-1225240850_S
hachar.pdf.
Audra Simpson. On Ethnographic Refusal: Indigeneity, ‘Voice’ and Colonial Citizenship. Junctures: The Journal for Thematic
Dialogue, pages 67–80, 2007. URL https://junctures.org/index.php/junctures/article/view/66. Issue 9.
Audra Simpson. Mohawk Interruptus: Political Life Across the Borders of Settler States . Duke University Press, 2014. doi:
10.1215/9780822376781. URL https://www.dukeupress.edu/mohawk-interruptus.
Konstantinos Stefanis. Reasoned exhibitions: Blake in 1809 and Reynolds in 1813. Tate Papers, 2010. ISSN 1753-9854. URL
https://www.tate.org.uk/research/tate-papers/14/reasoned-exhibitions-blake-in-1809-and-reynolds-in-1813 . Issue 14.
Autumn. Unpaginated official HTML article; locators identify paragraph incipits and note numbers.
Swiss Confederation. Federal constitution of the Swiss Confederation of 18 April 1999. SR 101, text status 1 January 2024, in
the Swiss Parliament Manual, status 1 March 2024, 2024. URL https://www.parlament.ch/centers/documents/en/202403
01_BV-en.pdf. English informational translation. Article numbers refer to the constitutional section; its PDF page number
is four greater than its printed page.
James Tully. Reconciling struggles over the recognition of minorities: Towards a dialogical approach. In A vigail Eisenberg,
editor, Diversity and Equality: The Changing Framework of Freedom in Canada , Law and Society, pages 15–33. UBC Press,
Vancouver, 2006. ISBN 9780774812399. URL https://www.ubcpress.ca/asset/9520/1/9780774812399.pdf. Publisher sample:
chapter pages 15–33 correspond to PDF pages 25–43.
United Nations General Assembly. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. A/RES/61/295, adopted
13 September 2007; March 2008 English printing, 2007. URL https://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_e
n.pdf.
Joseph Viscomi. The workshop. Studies in Romanticism , 21(3):404–409, 1982. doi: 10.2307/25600369. URL https://viscomi.
sites.oasis.unc.edu/viscomi/coursepack/criticism_etc/Viscomi-%20Illuminated%20Printing.pdf . Fall. Author-hosted reprint
headed Blake’s Workshop: compilation PDF pages 58–68; web-print pages 1–11.
75

## Page 76

Joseph Viscomi. Blake’s invention of illuminated printing, 1788. BRANCH: Britain, Representation and Nineteenth-Century
History, March 2012. URL https://branchcollective.org/?ps_articles=joseph-viscomi-blakes-invention-of-illuminated-
printing-1788. Published March 2012. Unpaginated essay; citations identify sections and paragraph incipits.
Joseph Viscomi. William Blake’s 1818 letter to Dawson Turner and later career as graphic artist. BRANCH: Britain, Repre-
sentation and Nineteenth-Century History, March 2022. URL https://branchcollective.org/?ps_articles=joseph-viscomi-
william-blakes-1818-letter-to-dawson-turner-and-later-career-as-graphic-artist . Published March 2022. Unpaginated essay;
citations identify sections and paragraph incipits. The title’s 1818 dates Blake’s letter.
Harry White. Blake’s resolution to the war between science and philosophy. Blake/An Illustrated Quarterly , 39(3):108–125,
2005. URL https://bq.blakearchive.org/39.3.white . Winter 2005/2006; official HTML version read, including all notes and
works cited.
76